Dirty Little Monster

Express, Liverpool, Rocket, Dirty Little Monster, etc.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
User avatar
RJ Guitars
Posts: 2662
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 am
Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by RJ Guitars »

mcrracer wrote:Hey RJ
This looks very interesting We may very well end up with several different workable takes on a DLM type amp. Without verification from an actual owner we just have to build until we are happy with the result.. B+1...should it really be before the standby switch? Exxcuse my question but I just don't understand this part. Also what do you think about it having a NFB control? If so should it come in on pin 8 of V1a? Do you have estimates of what you think the B+ voltages should be? I am sure your design skills far outpace mine so please excuse my noob type questions. Thanks for starting the ball rolling.
If I had drawn it right the B+ would be on the other side of the standby switch , the same as the Trainwreck Rocket. Schematic is now updated to reflect this correctly. This allows for those first two caps to charge up by themselves and not hammer the GZ34 rectifier with all the filter caps charging at at once... kinda like what Ron had mentioned.... good catch and it's fixed now.

I haven't gotten as far as NFB but I'm sure we need to experiment with it at the very least...

The correct B+ voltages for a DLM? I can only guess. There are claims that you can get from 8-12 watts out of this amp so that gives us a clue. KF seemed to prefer moderate B+ voltages in his other builds so that will flavor my guess as well. What power transformer voltages would make sense? My guess is not less than 235V and not more than 300V. Those are transformer voltages but I know everybody can sort out the approximate B+ from that. How's that for non committal. I threw in a somewhat random value on my schematic because I happen to have a 280-0-280 custom wound transformer from Edcor and I'm thinking that is a good middle of the road starting place.

Speaking of transformers, one other feature common to most Trainwreck amps was the use of heavy iron. That flavored my choice of the 25 watt output tranny as well as the 250mA power tranny. I'm not familiar with a lot of hefty Single ended output trannies and I read something somewhere about a prototype SE wreck that used a PP output tranny with the center tap lifted.... it's more guess work and speculation than fact until the official answers make their way to us.

rj
Good, Fast, or Cheap -- Pick two...

http://www.rjguitars.net
http://www.rjaudioresearch.com/
http://diyguitaramps.prophpbb.com/
User avatar
sliberty
Posts: 1324
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 5:03 pm

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by sliberty »

Thanks for clearing me up on that RJ.
Jana
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:40 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by Jana »

More thinking out loud from me:

I would try to avoid splitting up the tubes for the cathode follower, it is a much cleaner build if it is on one tube. So, how about removing the stage that is now marked V2b? the wiper of the treble pot could go either to a voltage divider or a 250K pot and then feed the grid of V3. Then, for a presence control, a 47K to 100K resistor to the 820 ohm cathode resistor of the cathode follower. This makes the NFB. For the Presence a .1uf cap to a 5k pot to ground.

If it was left as a plexi style circuit with the one gain stage before the CF, I would do a simple resistance divider from the treble to V3. A 220k to ground and whatever value is needed on the top side.

If two gain stages were before the CF, such as a 2204 style circuit, then I would probably put a master volume (250K) from the treble to V3.

Also, maybe a bleeder resistor from C18/C19 to ground so that the caps don't charge to a high voltage when in standby?
User avatar
dartanion
Posts: 1562
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:02 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by dartanion »

From looking at Wreckboy's photo, it appears to have 2 inputs, 6 knobs (guessing that it's VTMB Pres. MV). There is no standby switch on the front panel, but it may be on back? Or not have one at all.
Eardrums!!! We don't need no stinkin' eardrums!
User avatar
Ron Worley
Posts: 908
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:21 pm
Location: Keller, TX

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by Ron Worley »

If you blow it up, it appears that the controls are:

Volume, Treble, Bass. ?, Presence, "Q" (???) with "slope" on the side of the of the last pot....

Could the last one be some sort of parametric EQ?? Or changing the value of a slope resistor?? :?: :?:
Ron
paulster
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:08 pm
Location: Los Angeles & London

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by paulster »

Has anyone looked at the JCM8000 Bass series for preamp inspiration, as this is quite different from the JCM800 guitar amp? (See http://www.freeinfosociety.com/electron ... php?id=478)

I nearly snagged one of these a year or so ago but just missed it.

It has a sweepable mid control (sweep and mid), bass, treble, volume and slope.

If this DLM preamp does indeed resemble a JCM800 then the sweepable mid may have been left out to get the gain up and the master and presence controls added back in.

It may be some food for thought at least as an alternative JCM800-style preamp.
User avatar
gahult
Posts: 393
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:20 pm
Location: Rutledge, GA

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by gahult »

wreckboy told us the controls see:

http://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... c&start=45

INFO: Front Panel

Input
Gain
Treble
Bass
Master
Harmonics (Presence)
Slope (Midrange)
On Switch
Pilot Light


Back Panel

Power Cable
Fuse
Ext speaker
Main Speaker (8ohm)

2 ECC83 (GT Yugo)
1 EL 34 (Mullard xf2 )
1 GZ 34 (Mullard)

Single ended (EL34/6L6/6550) 8 to 10 watts
note: the original used a 6550
this Prototype sounded best with an EL34

Gary
In the 60's people took acid to make the world weird. Now the world is weird , and they take Prozac to make it normal.
El_Martin
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 8:49 am

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by El_Martin »

Hi there!

There's no documentation in English, but my first built was a 12 W SE (TT66, documented on tubetown.de) amp with a toroidal 2x300V and the Hammond 125 ESE. Auto/cathode bias. If you use the larger tubes (6550) at higher voltages (400+) you might prefer even a bigger output iron. 125 ESE is larger than Fenders 35 W PP OT iirc. Some use 125 FSE.

The schematic is like a CHAMP. Just for fun I've put a cascode (see firefly AX84) in front of it. :?: 8) :shock:

Not a Dumble, not a Plexi, just different. Similar to pentode front ends. Gain enuff.

Just if in case you like your CHAMP on the slightly FATTER side.

Ciao
Martin
PS: my latest built: Princeton derivative "der kleine TonPrinz", not documented here, see tubetown.de or ask me :) w. 15" Eminence and solid mahogany cabinet.
Looks like I'm not only into the skinny ones...
User avatar
dartanion
Posts: 1562
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:02 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by dartanion »

My production amp, the Absinthe is parallel singled ended octals, but I have been using EL34s. I need to try some other tubes in it just to see how they sound. The OT is good 35-40W SE, so it can handle just about anything.

It's an interesting amp for sure, and really sounds mean.
Eardrums!!! We don't need no stinkin' eardrums!
mcrracer
Posts: 442
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:57 am
Location: Chicago IL

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by mcrracer »

Hey Dart, can you tell us what iron you are using? It may have an application here. I for one am not stuck on using a PP tranny for my SE build. Thanks
Zippy
Posts: 2052
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:18 pm

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by Zippy »

Ron Worley wrote:If you blow it up, it appears that the controls are:

Volume, Treble, Bass. ?, Presence, "Q" (???) with "slope" on the side of the of the last pot....

Could the last one be some sort of parametric EQ?? Or changing the value of a slope resistor?? :?: :?:
This was addressed in the first page of the thread.
User avatar
Richie
Posts: 1174
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 am
Location: Ky

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by Richie »

I use a SE 35 watt ot in the Beast II.. I think Dana has the numbers on it,or i can look and see if i can find the info.. made by heyboer.
The Beast II runs a 5979 preamp,and a 12ax7 channel,which also the 5879 feeds into the 12AX7.. dual octals,with option of flipping one out with a switch..
User avatar
Ron Worley
Posts: 908
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:21 pm
Location: Keller, TX

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by Ron Worley »

Zippy wrote:
Ron Worley wrote:If you blow it up, it appears that the controls are:

Volume, Treble, Bass. ?, Presence, "Q" (???) with "slope" on the side of the of the last pot....

Could the last one be some sort of parametric EQ?? Or changing the value of a slope resistor?? :?: :?:
This was addressed in the first page of the thread.
And that is why I am a dumb ass.... :oops:
Ron
Zippy
Posts: 2052
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:18 pm

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by Zippy »

Not at all, Ron. That was not my intent.

We are already hitting the third page of the thread and many are starting to iterate on previous posts. I am getting a lil' frustrated by the good intentions that seem to be swamping the forward motion. ;)

Forward - in all directions!

What kind of iron would we need for a 100w SE amp? Anyone got some spare arc welder parts? :twisted:
mcrracer
Posts: 442
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:57 am
Location: Chicago IL

Re: Dirty Little Monster

Post by mcrracer »

For output iron, I'd use a Fender Deluxe Reverb OT with the center tap lifted. If sourcing new SE iron, I'd go with iron rated at 15 watts or greater.[/quote]

Zippy or anyone who can answer...Ok on using a PP OT lift ct BUT how do we figure or know what our primary impedance is when using PP trannies. They are quite a bit cheaper over using SE OT iron of similar wattage.? Do you think KF tried a PP OT in a SE design because he just happened to have one handy? From what I have read he seemed to be very good at using what he had available.
Post Reply