Which A470 and why?

Express, Liverpool, Rocket, Dirty Little Monster, etc.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
selloutrr
Posts: 3694
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:44 am
Location: Southern California

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by selloutrr »

My Daughter Build Stone Henge
User avatar
RJ Guitars
Posts: 2662
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:49 am
Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico
Contact:

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by RJ Guitars »

Great Discussion. The common "Wreck" Heyboer transformers I sell were all built to specifications provided by Rob Hinson. Rob left these part numbers open (unprotected) so we could all have access to them. He is the most knowledgeable guy I know on transformer technology and has been very generous in sharing that knowledge with us. The Express and Liverpool transformers appear to be clones of the old Stancor transformers, much the same as the Trainwreck specification output tranny that Pacific sells.

The HTS-8093-1 is clone of the Dynaco-470 tranny minus the ultra-linear taps. From the notes I have from Heyboer, the use of the M19/29 steel rather than the M6 was intended to "give it a little hair". This is apparently a specification that the early Wreck clone guys and Heyboer developed. I can only speculate they had good info to work with and the results have been consistently producing great sounding amps for many years. The Heyboer transformer compliment that became the "Wreck Clone Standard" was given in this thread: http://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... ht=heyboer This transformer set has been used in dozens if not hundreds of Rocket clones and the reports are consistently favorable.

The Edcor transformer that Mark Fowler mentioned is not a clone of the Dynaco and uses a 5 layer wind rather than a Dynaco style 7 layer winding. It's way beyond me to understand the complexities of transformer behavior well enough to make good technical comparisons. I have found that your ears are the critical metric in judging if you have the right one - YMMV.

rj
Good, Fast, or Cheap -- Pick two...

http://www.rjguitars.net
http://www.rjaudioresearch.com/
http://diyguitaramps.prophpbb.com/
RevD
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:21 am

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by RevD »

RJ Guitars wrote:I have found that your ears are the critical metric in judging if you have the right one - YMMV.

rj
I suspect Ken could tune around whatever he was using (I often wonder how much folklore of what Ken used was because of what he had laying around haha.) The man was a Master.

Regards,

Don
hitchcaster
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:30 am

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by hitchcaster »

selloutrr wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2012 2:10 am
billyz wrote:The A470 is an Ultra linear design . I would bet that KF's mod was to stuff the unused tap inside the end covers. That's what I do with them. Insulated of course.
From what I've researched. The Dynaco A470 transformers were worked on/rewound by Merren before being used in TW Rocket.
can you say or show where you got this info from? i just asked chris about express and rocket trannies and he said the only trannies he did for ken were from scratch. unless he was just replying to the express part of my question which was about both amps. im still chasing this "transformers for rocket" thing :D
User avatar
Colossal
Posts: 5048
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Moving through Kashmir

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by Colossal »

hitchcaster wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:02 am
selloutrr wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2012 2:10 am
billyz wrote:The A470 is an Ultra linear design . I would bet that KF's mod was to stuff the unused tap inside the end covers. That's what I do with them. Insulated of course.
From what I've researched. The Dynaco A470 transformers were worked on/rewound by Merren before being used in TW Rocket.
can you say or show where you got this info from? i just asked chris about express and rocket trannies and he said the only trannies he did for ken were from scratch. unless he was just replying to the express part of my question which was about both amps. im still chasing this "transformers for rocket" thing :D
Hitchcaster,

Both Selloutrr and Billyz have moved on from AmpGarage some years ago, so I'm not sure if you'll ever get a reply. When guys were first building Rockets, member Robert Hinson (rhinson) had Heyboer modify A470s to use non grain oriented steel and ditch the U/L taps. There may have been something done with the interleaving pattern, but not sure IIRC. This OT was offered by Rhinson and then the line card later passed to RJ.

EDIT: Duh, I reread up a little further into this thread and RJ spells out the modifciation :roll:
hitchcaster
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:30 am

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by hitchcaster »

Colossal wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 1:40 pm
hitchcaster wrote: Wed Sep 26, 2018 7:02 am
selloutrr wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2012 2:10 am

From what I've researched. The Dynaco A470 transformers were worked on/rewound by Merren before being used in TW Rocket.
can you say or show where you got this info from? i just asked chris about express and rocket trannies and he said the only trannies he did for ken were from scratch. unless he was just replying to the express part of my question which was about both amps. im still chasing this "transformers for rocket" thing :D
Hitchcaster,

Both Selloutrr and Billyz have moved on from AmpGarage some years ago, so I'm not sure if you'll ever get a reply. When guys were first building Rockets, member Robert Hinson (rhinson) had Heyboer modify A470s to use non grain oriented steel and ditch the U/L taps. There may have been something done with the interleaving pattern, but not sure IIRC. This OT was offered by Rhinson and then the line card later passed to RJ.

EDIT: Duh, I reread up a little further into this thread and RJ spells out the modifciation :roll:
ok thanks.. yeah i forgot Selloutrr is gone, thats too bad.. i was hoping he would respond since he has info on this (and many other things).. ive tried the heyboer, pacifics, and original a470... i still don't think the rocket has been fully uncovered. just guess work thats gotten things closer. notice selloutrr said the rocket had A470's that were modded or rewound.. getting rid of UL taps is not a "mod" as far as im concerned :-) thank you for the response 8)
Roe
Posts: 1650
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by Roe »

any experience with this a470 from LM audio: https://www.laboratoriomusicale.net/en/ ... eplica-new
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
User avatar
ViperDoc
Posts: 1247
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2019 2:21 am
Location: Idaho

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by ViperDoc »

I just got asked this from Phil at Heyboer:

“Do you want the Dynaco A470 4.3K HTS-8093-1 or 5.2K HTS-9633 OT? Both have been sold for the Rocket.”

Which would you recommend? I believe the A470 is an ultra linear design (where you’d cap and stuff the UL taps). Is the 5K2 the Express OT?

EDIT: I'm getting a price breakdown from Phil about the A470. If anyone is interested in a full Rocket PT/choke/OT package from Heyboer, let me know.
Just plug it in, man.
User avatar
Colossal
Posts: 5048
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Moving through Kashmir

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by Colossal »

You want the 4k3 Dynaco A-470-S. The Heyboer wound OT eliminates the ultralinear taps the original had.
User avatar
ViperDoc
Posts: 1247
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2019 2:21 am
Location: Idaho

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by ViperDoc »

Colossal wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 9:09 pm You want the 4k3 Dynaco A-470-S. The Heyboer wound OT eliminates the ultralinear taps the original had.
Even if you plan on not using them? Just trying to figure out what to tell Phil. He has RJ's A470 diagrams. I'll ask him about the "-S". Thanks, dude.
Just plug it in, man.
Mark
Posts: 2982
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:10 am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by Mark »

ViperDoc wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 4:49 pm I just got asked this from Phil at Heyboer:

“Do you want the Dynaco A470 4.3K HTS-8093-1 or 5.2K HTS-9633 OT? Both have been sold for the Rocket.”

Which would you recommend? I believe the A470 is an ultra linear design (where you’d cap and stuff the UL taps). Is the 5K2 the Express OT?

EDIT: I'm getting a price breakdown from Phil about the A470. If anyone is interested in a full Rocket PT/choke/OT package from Heyboer, let me know.
I thought the 5.2K HTS-9633 OT was used in the Liverpool amp as an alternative to the 6.6K primary. Don’t quote me though.
Yours Sincerely

Mark Abbott
User avatar
ViperDoc
Posts: 1247
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2019 2:21 am
Location: Idaho

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by ViperDoc »

HTS-8093-1 is the Heyboer OT code for the Dynaco 7-layer build up without the UL taps, 4K3 primary.
Just plug it in, man.
Roe
Posts: 1650
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by Roe »

pacific offers one with a 5k5 primary
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
Mark
Posts: 2982
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:10 am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by Mark »

Roe wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 11:12 am pacific offers one with a 5k5 primary
What is the part number on it?

I thought RJ did initially build a Rocket with the 5.2K transformer before finding out it was the wrong part.
Yours Sincerely

Mark Abbott
Roe
Posts: 1650
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: Which A470 and why?

Post by Roe »

Mark wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 2:20 pm
Roe wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 11:12 am pacific offers one with a 5k5 primary
What is the part number on it?

I thought RJ did initially build a Rocket with the 5.2K transformer before finding out it was the wrong part.
[PAM-OT-35-72R]
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0519/ ... 1646167340
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
Post Reply