Derailment Build

Express, Liverpool, Rocket, Dirty Little Monster, etc.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
jarrodthebobo
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2019 11:50 am
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: Derailment Build

Post by jarrodthebobo »

Riffmonster wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 3:03 pm
Mark wrote: Fri Dec 20, 2019 11:32 am Wouldn't you use the negative feedback loop to minimise distortion and tighten bass response.
Yes you might be right. Although I never really understood what a tighter bass response really means when you play.
I always took it to mean less "flub"
Mark
Posts: 2982
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:10 am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: Derailment Build

Post by Mark »

I hear the bass response still being present but the amp has better control over the response of the speaker and it can't ring on beyond the note.
Yours Sincerely

Mark Abbott
Riffmonster
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:09 am

Re: Derailment Build

Post by Riffmonster »

Thanks Mark and Jarrod. I will let you know I will implement the NFB switch, however, I am quite busy these days.
User avatar
jarrodthebobo
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2019 11:50 am
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: Derailment Build

Post by jarrodthebobo »

Riffmonster wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 3:20 pm Thanks Mark and Jarrod. I will let you know I will implement the NFB switch, however, I am quite busy these days.
From my own experiences building a Single ended Marshall plexi/jcm800 thing, NFB is CRUCIAL to the overall sound of the amp as a whole. Id 100% give it a go and throw in a presence knob as well. I've found presence to be pretty important to the overall Trainwreck sound too.
Riffmonster
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:09 am

Re: Derailment Build

Post by Riffmonster »

jarrodthebobo wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 7:12 pm
Riffmonster wrote: Thu Dec 26, 2019 3:20 pm Thanks Mark and Jarrod. I will let you know I will implement the NFB switch, however, I am quite busy these days.
From my own experiences building a Single ended Marshall plexi/jcm800 thing, NFB is CRUCIAL to the overall sound of the amp as a whole. Id 100% give it a go and throw in a presence knob as well. I've found presence to be pretty important to the overall Trainwreck sound too.
So, which values would you use? 5k pot with a 0.1 uf cap like in the Express? And how about the resistor coming from the 8 ohm tab? It is 47k in the express. Colossal said earlier the original had a 100k though.
Thanks.
User avatar
Colossal
Posts: 5048
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Moving through Kashmir

Re: Derailment Build

Post by Colossal »

Riffmonster wrote: Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:47 pm Colossal said earlier the original had a 100k though.
Express is 100k NFB off the 8R tap into 5k/0.1uF Presence.
Riffmonster
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:09 am

Re: Derailment Build

Post by Riffmonster »

Colossal wrote: Fri Dec 27, 2019 10:26 pm
Riffmonster wrote: Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:47 pm Colossal said earlier the original had a 100k though.
Express is 100k NFB off the 8R tap into 5k/0.1uF Presence.
Right! My bad, I was looking at version A0.
Mark
Posts: 2982
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:10 am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: Derailment Build

Post by Mark »

I'm wondering how you would implement negative feedback and a presence control without messing with the cold clipping stage?

I'm thinking the negative feedback would have to go to a stage after the cold clipper that simulates the PI stage. The Tweed PI does have a certain tonal character.
Yours Sincerely

Mark Abbott
User avatar
jarrodthebobo
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2019 11:50 am
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: Derailment Build

Post by jarrodthebobo »

Mark wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2019 9:00 pm I'm wondering how you would implement negative feedback and a presence control without messing with the cold clipping stage?

I'm thinking the negative feedback would have to go to a stage after the cold clipper that simulates the PI stage. The Tweed PI does have a certain tonal character.
Exactly; in both builds of mine where I've built a single ended amp with negative feedback, I've implemented an extra triode stage to be a fake PI of sorts. I believe that if you use a 100k plate resistor and a 2.2k cathode resistor, unbypassed with a cap, you end up with close to the same gain you'd get from a PI.
Mark
Posts: 2982
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:10 am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: Derailment Build

Post by Mark »

jarrodthebobo wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:48 pm
Mark wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2019 9:00 pm I'm wondering how you would implement negative feedback and a presence control without messing with the cold clipping stage?

I'm thinking the negative feedback would have to go to a stage after the cold clipper that simulates the PI stage. The Tweed PI does have a certain tonal character.
Exactly; in both builds of mine where I've built a single ended amp with negative feedback, I've implemented an extra triode stage to be a fake PI of sorts. I believe that if you use a 100k plate resistor and a 2.2k cathode resistor, unbypassed with a cap, you end up with close to the same gain you'd get from a PI.
So you're hanging the 100K feedback resistor onto the 2.2K cathode resistor, but how are you implementing a presence control?

I had thought of using a 1K cathode resistor, stick with with 10K tail resistor andthe 5K presence pot on the end of the 10K tail resistor.
Yours Sincerely

Mark Abbott
Riffmonster
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:09 am

Re: Derailment Build

Post by Riffmonster »

Happy new year guys!
Very interesting thoughts from both of you. I have indeed one triode unused of one 12ax7, so I could implement that fake PI. But wouldn’t it exceed the overall gain? The amp has a lot of gain already.

Cheers
User avatar
jarrodthebobo
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2019 11:50 am
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: Derailment Build

Post by jarrodthebobo »

Mark wrote: Wed Jan 01, 2020 10:11 am
jarrodthebobo wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:48 pm
Mark wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2019 9:00 pm I'm wondering how you would implement negative feedback and a presence control without messing with the cold clipping stage?

I'm thinking the negative feedback would have to go to a stage after the cold clipper that simulates the PI stage. The Tweed PI does have a certain tonal character.
Exactly; in both builds of mine where I've built a single ended amp with negative feedback, I've implemented an extra triode stage to be a fake PI of sorts. I believe that if you use a 100k plate resistor and a 2.2k cathode resistor, unbypassed with a cap, you end up with close to the same gain you'd get from a PI.
So you're hanging the 100K feedback resistor onto the 2.2K cathode resistor, but how are you implementing a presence control?

I had thought of using a 1K cathode resistor, stick with with 10K tail resistor andthe 5K presence pot on the end of the 10K tail resistor.
You run the presence control like you would in any amp; it's just where you put it that's different. The 100k feedback resistor goes to the cathode of the triode, then you tap the presence control off of the cathode as well
User avatar
jarrodthebobo
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2019 11:50 am
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: Derailment Build

Post by jarrodthebobo »

Riffmonster wrote: Wed Jan 01, 2020 1:35 pm Happy new year guys!
Very interesting thoughts from both of you. I have indeed one triode unused of one 12ax7, so I could implement that fake PI. But wouldn’t it exceed the overall gain? The amp has a lot of gain already.

Cheers
If you're pretty reserved in how much gain you give that extra triode, you should be able to get close to the same amount of gain a PI gives. If my calculations are correct; a PI typically has a gain of around 23, and a normal gainstage with a 2.2k cathode resistor, unbypassed, and with a plate resistor of 100k, has a gain of around 25; so close to the same ballpark. Although the clipping characteristics will be slightly different, it'll be better than building this without the fake PI, imho.
Riffmonster
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:09 am

Re: Derailment Build

Post by Riffmonster »

jarrodthebobo wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2020 1:02 am
Riffmonster wrote: Wed Jan 01, 2020 1:35 pm Happy new year guys!
Very interesting thoughts from both of you. I have indeed one triode unused of one 12ax7, so I could implement that fake PI. But wouldn’t it exceed the overall gain? The amp has a lot of gain already.

Cheers
If you're pretty reserved in how much gain you give that extra triode, you should be able to get close to the same amount of gain a PI gives. If my calculations are correct; a PI typically has a gain of around 23, and a normal gainstage with a 2.2k cathode resistor, unbypassed, and with a plate resistor of 100k, has a gain of around 25; so close to the same ballpark. Although the clipping characteristics will be slightly different, it'll be better than building this without the fake PI, imho.
I think I got now what you mean. So I would still leave one triode unused of the both 12AX7?
Still, I am super happy how the amp sounds now. Especially for home use with an attenuator. Sounds better than my 18 watters and another Trainwreck with ECC99 power stage.
I might build it again with an EL34 and a FX Loop. Then I could consider the NFB. For now I leave it untouched, I think. Thanks a lot for all the input!
Riffmonster
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 1:09 am

Re: Derailment Build

Post by Riffmonster »

I still haven't implemented the NFB, but I had the chance to a quick recording with an impulse response. Just give it a listen of you are interested!
Thanks
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Post Reply