Mark wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 11:58 am
It is an odd value for a grid stopper, the smallest I've used is 1K. I don't see what is would be doing either.
I have seen 100R-1k or so used on the grids and cathodes of cathode followers in hi-fi applications. I think the added grid resistor is just there to help stop any oscillation but not affect the waveform, distorting it. Maybe kind of how KF used a very small value (820R) on V1b and/or V1a just to tame the beast a little.
I've had yet another crazy idea, as I'd like a LarMar master volume. I could reduced the vib/trem controls to one pull pot or switch. I still may have to use a switch as I seem to remember these circuits use reverse audio taper pots and have large values such as 3M ohms. The speed switch does only go as high as 1 meg which suggests a pot could work though it smallest resistor is 330K. All good for thought.
I was always a proponent of the LarMar master volume up until somewhat recently. I have been working on a 2xEL84 design for a while. A LarMaster is a useful tool, and while it does reduce volume, I was rather surprised at the noise it can add. Not a horrible, glaring buzz or something, but definitely noticeable with and without (even with good lead dress). Enough to make me really think about it. I built out another two channel 18W that is my favorite yet. It has a paralleled triode channel (into one side of the PI) and the other is a two triode cascade (into the other side of the PI). Both channels have the typical 18W Vol and Tone controls. The grid leak resistors are fixed in that amp, no LarMaster. The nature of that paralleled triode is such that the sound is very linear whether turned down low or turned up. I just set the amp's Vol and Tone, and then use my guitar's volume and tone controls to get where I need to be. I find I don't even
need a PPIMV with that amp and it is better and quieter for it. That said, if I was going to build a 100W Plexi, sure, I'd drop a PPIMV in it without hesitation so I think it's about the amp and the intended use.
Over time, I am finding that my preference is for the most stripped down circuit. When I first read Greg Fyer's BMAC30 pages years ago, I was very interested because all Brian May is using is 1/2 triode into a PI, no tone controls (+6dB gain). I am very much enamored with the Songwriter 30 and the parallel triode-into-a-PI and EL84s topology. I daresay I like it even more than the Rocket. So, my point of all this rambling...with your AC30 build, Mark, are you looking for an exploration platform to try AC30 ideas, or go with the stripped down May Minimalist design, but incorporating only those features that are true advancements to stability and reliability, while cutting all the rest of the fat?
A hum balance pot is yet another idea. This has worked well on an Ampeg SVT, though I don't know if it would be any better that using the centre tap for the 6.3 filaments?
In previous endeavors to build complicated amps
, I tried a hum balance pot on a number of them, push-pull and single ended. I found that it didn't seem to do much! The heater windings were always balanced anyway and even unbalancing them with the pot didn't seem to make the amp hum. So, I don't use a balance pot at all, but do almost always elevate the heater centertap to DC, especially if there is a CF in the amp.