AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
jazzbass
Posts: 305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Resana, TV, Italy
Contact:

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by jazzbass »

Hi Ian,

Thanks, you have the sight of an eagle. I had forgotten to connect the GNFB resistor because I wasn't sure I wanted 12K on the 4 Ohm speaker output and then ..... finished the job I just forgot about it. :lol:

I also checked the Choke and V2 Plate and brushed other welds that seemed unsafe to me.
Now I do a general check before mounting the valves and then I build the FET board, the relay power supply circuit is done.

It is likely that on Saturday I can tell you if the experiment of adding the FET card on a Wonderland / JM was successful.

Thanks again Ian.

Un abbraccio
Franco
franco mezzalira
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by norburybrook »

Franco,

Excellent, I'm looking forward to finding out how the FET is on this amp.

in the English language we have different words for welding and soldering unlike Italian that uses 'Saldare' for both :) Welding in English usually means joining peices of metal together , Mig welding, Tig welding , Spot welding etc I think soldering used to differentiate using Lead , so electrical and plumbing joints.

My ex Wife is Italian and I have a half Italian daughter :mrgreen:

:)

M
jazzbass
Posts: 305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Resana, TV, Italy
Contact:

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by jazzbass »

Hi norburybrook,

so, in your opinion, what term should I use, welding or soldering?
This afternoon I did the valve test and .... I have a problem with the FET circuit more precisely with the relay ground. It is the first time that I have designed this circuit by myself and I do not understand where to connect the relay board ground.
I have connected the relay power supply to ground near the power supply itself but .... where do I connect the relay ground?

Grazie

Franco
franco mezzalira
User avatar
Reeltarded
Posts: 9955
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
Location: GA USA

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by Reeltarded »

with everything near input..
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 13209
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by martin manning »

jazzbass wrote: Thu Oct 07, 2021 7:47 pm so, in your opinion, what term should I use, welding or soldering?
Welding is joining metal by melting and fusing the parent metal, usually with some similar filler metal added.
Soldering is joining using a filler metal that is different from the parent metal, and which melts at a lower temperature. There is mo melting of the parent metal.
In English, soldering is the correct term for making electrical connections.

The British like to incorrectly call brazing (soldering with brass alloy) "bronze welding" ;^)
jazzbass wrote: Thu Oct 07, 2021 7:47 pmThis afternoon I did the valve test and .... I have a problem with the FET circuit more precisely with the relay ground. It is the first time that I have designed this circuit by myself and I do not understand where to connect the relay board ground.
I have connected the relay power supply to ground near the power supply itself but .... where do I connect the relay ground?
The relay signal ground goes to the input jack ground. The relay coil ground should be routed back to the relay power supply ground to energize the relay. Typically it goes to the footswitch jack ground lug and then to the relay supply chassis ground.
jazzbass
Posts: 305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Resana, TV, Italy
Contact:

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by jazzbass »

Hi everyone,

I have a problem that occurred every time I built a Wonderland / JM 100Watt, the reverb is weak, too weak. I built with the Ceriatone layout, Colgar layout, Taylor Amplified Nation layout, tried to decrease the value of R42 to have more wet signal but nothing to do, the amount of reverb is small.

The transformers used are the Hammond indicated in the diagram, or the Heyboer, or the InMadOut, but the amount of reverb was always small and I had some small increases by replacing the 12AT7 tube with a 12AX7.

What can I do?
Thanks for any suggestions you will feel you can give me.

Franco
franco mezzalira
neskor
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2020 1:53 pm

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by neskor »

jazzbass
Posts: 305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Resana, TV, Italy
Contact:

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by jazzbass »

Hello Neskor,

I had read all the norburybrook article you mentioned and I had already made all the changes reported, the only one I had not taken into consideration was to replace the reverb return potentiometer taking it from 100K to 250K. :roll:
The result is that the reverb volume is increased and is quite "acceptable" if I leave the changes made previously ..... the two cathode cap of V4 replaced with 25mf and V3 replaced with a 12AX7. However, the result is still modest even with the 9AB3C1B Belton tank. What can I do more? I listened to some clips on youtube and in all of them the reverb was good.
Thanks for any help.

Franco
franco mezzalira
User avatar
Guy77
Posts: 915
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 2:46 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by Guy77 »

If you have a cap across the SEND pot replace it with a lower value or remove it altogether and your reverb should greatly increase.

Cheers
Guy
jazzbass
Posts: 305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Resana, TV, Italy
Contact:

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by jazzbass »

Guy77 wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 3:12 am If you have a cap across the SEND pot replace it with a lower value or remove it altogether and your reverb should greatly increase.

Cheers
Guy
hi guy77,

already done, honestly I have never put it in any amp of this type, I like the richer sound of the reverb without this capacitor even if it has a little more high frequencies that do not bother.
I'm starting to think it's the tank type, maybe I should use the one with two springs instead of the tank with three springs.

Thanks

Franco
franco mezzalira
User avatar
ijedouglas
Posts: 701
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 9:07 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by ijedouglas »

Guy77 wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 3:12 am If you have a cap across the SEND pot replace it with a lower value or remove it altogether and your reverb should greatly increase.

Cheers
Guy
Guy,

Is that a cap across the SEND or RETURN? On the layout I see a 0.01 (I think it should be a 750pf) on the RETURN pot.
Ian
User avatar
Guy77
Posts: 915
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 2:46 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by Guy77 »

ijedouglas wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 1:09 pm
Guy77 wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 3:12 am If you have a cap across the SEND pot replace it with a lower value or remove it altogether and your reverb should greatly increase.

Cheers
Guy
Guy,

Is that a cap across the SEND or RETURN? On the layout I see a 0.01 (I think it should be a 750pf) on the RETURN pot.
Thanks for the correction Ian, yes its across the RETURN pot.

Yes 750pf will give you more reverb than the .01 cap.

Hi Franco, you can also try increasing the SEND pot to 1MA.

Cheers
Guy
Bombacaototal
Posts: 1673
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:53 am

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by Bombacaototal »

jazzbass wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 6:15 am
Guy77 wrote: Tue Oct 12, 2021 3:12 am If you have a cap across the SEND pot replace it with a lower value or remove it altogether and your reverb should greatly increase.

Cheers
Guy
hi guy77,

already done, honestly I have never put it in any amp of this type, I like the richer sound of the reverb without this capacitor even if it has a little more high frequencies that do not bother.
I'm starting to think it's the tank type, maybe I should use the one with two springs instead of the tank with three springs.

Thanks

Franco
3 springs (9AB) usually makes the reverb sound less pronounced than the 2 (4AB), so if you are looking for a bigger fender like reverb the two is the way to go. Removing the return cap will indeed increase the reverb, but you can also play with the dry/wet mixing resistors
jazzbass
Posts: 305
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Resana, TV, Italy
Contact:

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by jazzbass »

Thank you all,

I'm sorry but it's not entirely my fault, after hours of testing, measuring I found that what I took for granted was not. I ordered a dozen 1M resistors and I was sent some brown resistors whose colored bands were not clearly visible and I did not realize that their value was not the one ordered but 1K. Unfortunately I did not notice and I installed them with all the consequences I have described. Once the resistors were installed with the right value, the amplifier was reborn and shone as told by Taylor Amplified Nation, Martin Manning, norburybrook and all of you who have built and experienced this project. Especially norburybrook and Rayan who shared their research. I made all the changes they suggested to the layout kindly shared by Taylor and I find that now the amp really sounds with authority and richness, especially the reverb. I have yet to experiment with the FET circuit on this type of amplifier, then I will share the results.

Thanks for the help you have given me.

Franco
franco mezzalira
User avatar
norburybrook
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: AN Wonderland/JM 100w layout

Post by norburybrook »

jazzbass wrote: Wed Oct 13, 2021 9:27 pm Thank you all,

I'm sorry but it's not entirely my fault, after hours of testing, measuring I found that what I took for granted was not. I ordered a dozen 1M resistors and I was sent some brown resistors whose colored bands were not clearly visible and I did not realize that their value was not the one ordered but 1K. Unfortunately I did not notice and I installed them with all the consequences I have described. Once the resistors were installed with the right value, the amplifier was reborn and shone as told by Taylor Amplified Nation, Martin Manning, norburybrook and all of you who have built and experienced this project. Especially norburybrook and Rayan who shared their research. I made all the changes they suggested to the layout kindly shared by Taylor and I find that now the amp really sounds with authority and richness, especially the reverb. I have yet to experiment with the FET circuit on this type of amplifier, then I will share the results.

Thanks for the help you have given me.

Franco

you've learned a good lesson there Franco. I had the same thing with some Dale metal films which don't have colour bands :) they were sent witht eh wrong values and I didn't check :)

Glad you've sorted it.

Keep us up to date with the FET

M
Post Reply