Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
I have a Princeton non reverb and tremolo amp (Rob Robinette). I'm thinking to modify it's preamp to a JM two rock. I need your thoughts about this. Thank you.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- ijedouglas
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 9:07 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
Is this a Dumble circuit?
Mods, can we please keep this forum on point to discuss Dumble and his circuits.
Mods, can we please keep this forum on point to discuss Dumble and his circuits.
Ian
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
ijedouglas wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:52 am Is this a Dumble circuit?
Mods, can we please keep this forum on point to discuss Dumble and his circuits.
It's a Princeton circuit. I'm planning to modify its preamp to a John Mayer two rock/wonderland. I just want to hear some thoughts on this or if this modification is a waste of time.
Or should i post it in the fender discussion board?
- erwin_ve
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 8:06 am
- Location: Dordrecht, Netherlands
- Contact:
1 others liked this
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
You could post a schematic of the JM amp and then compare:Zorojuro wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 8:10 amijedouglas wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:52 am Is this a Dumble circuit?
Mods, can we please keep this forum on point to discuss Dumble and his circuits.
It's a Princeton circuit. I'm planning to modify its preamp to a John Mayer two rock/wonderland. I just want to hear some thoughts on this or if this modification is a waste of time.
Or should i post it in the fender discussion board?
-the amount of pre tubes with the Princeton.
-Is the current draw of the PT sufficient icw with the tube rectifier?
-Is there enough room for the change. (debatable?) In other words what are the dimensions of the chassis for both amps?
Doing this kind of homework has more potential for a serious response.
Erwin
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
If your expectation is that "the conversion" will sound anywhere close to a John Mayer Two Rock amp, then I think you are likely to be very disappointed?I just want to hear some thoughts on this or if this modification is a waste of time.
You might do a search on the "Small Special" with the idea of using 6V6's instead & see if that is something you're interested in?
With respect, 10thtx
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
Thanks for your responses Erwin and 10thx. I think it is not worth the time and effort to make some mods with my amp. I really appreciate your thoughts about it.
- martin manning
- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
1 others liked this
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
You could certainly modify the preamp stages to the JM sig. The first stage would be the same, but then you'd have the Dumble tone stack (same controls, different circuit), and the second stage in the JM has R//C input, a smaller Ck, and local negative feedback. Nothing wrong with trying that as an experiment. It will sound different from the Princeton.
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
Thanks martin. This is much more encouraging to widen the perspective of modification. I know it will not sound exactly like JM but I just want to try if some of it's vibe will also be available to this amp. Especially it has a different phase inverter, different power tubes, transformers, speakers and voltages. Thank you for your kind response.martin manning wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 12:58 pmYou could certainly modify the preamp stages to the JM sig. The first stage would be the same, but then you'd have the Dumble tone stack (same controls, different circuit), and the second stage in the JM has R//C input, a smaller Ck, and local negative feedback. Nothing wrong with trying that as an experiment. It will sound different from the Princeton.
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
It may or may not be a good sounding amp? This is a DRAFT unproven idea only for discussion and edits. It allows for a psuedo pretend active FX where you can place reverb and/or delay to fake some of the JM aspects.
I am NOT advocating building this. I would anticipate if this idea works that it would sound nothing like a JM Two Rock.
My advice is if you're not a reasonably advanced seasoned amp builder then I would NOT attempt this.
With respect, 10thtx
I am NOT advocating building this. I would anticipate if this idea works that it would sound nothing like a JM Two Rock.
My advice is if you're not a reasonably advanced seasoned amp builder then I would NOT attempt this.
With respect, 10thtx
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
I like the idea. Thanks for your suggestions.10thTx wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:10 pm It may or may not be a good sounding amp? This is a DRAFT unproven idea only for discussion and edits. It allows for a psuedo pretend active FX where you can place reverb and/or delay to fake some of the JM aspects.
I am NOT advocating building this. I would anticipate if this idea works that it would sound nothing like a JM Two Rock.
My advice is if you're not a reasonably advanced seasoned amp builder then I would NOT attempt this.
With respect, 10thtx
I've already built some amps and preamps in the past 4 years or so.
Really appreciate your efforts in drafting schematics.
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
Another one to consider given two 12A_7's. Obviously you'd need to make some changes for 6V6's.
With respect, 10thtx
With respect, 10thtx
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 1082
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:04 am
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
1 others liked this
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
I second that , very considerate and caring of you 10thTx, appreciate the extra effort to help each other
Charlie
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4228
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
3 others liked this
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
Two things:ijedouglas wrote: ↑Sun Dec 11, 2022 5:52 am Is this a Dumble circuit?
Mods, can we please keep this forum on point to discuss Dumble and his circuits.
1. I can't be expected to mod every post within 1 hour - If you can, I'd be happy to add you as a mod, but don't miss that 1 hour deadline.
2. It sounds to me that a john mayer Two rock is basically a dumble amp clone if I recall no?
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
- ijedouglas
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 9:07 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
Hey Phil, I appreciate all you do for the forum. Not sure where the 1 hour expectation came from though.pompeiisneaks wrote: ↑Mon Dec 12, 2022 4:46 am Two things:
1. I can't be expected to mod every post within 1 hour - If you can, I'd be happy to add you as a mod, but don't miss that 1 hour deadline.
2. It sounds to me that a john mayer Two rock is basically a dumble amp clone if I recall no?
~Phil
I was just trying to make the point that this forum was supposed to be about discussing Dumble and his circuits but often devolves into clones and in this case a circuit with distant Dumble DNA (ie not a clone). I am all for discussing new circuits and evolving the design but maybe a different forum may suit this discussion better.
I may be totally off base here and I apologize if so,
Ian
Re: Princeton Non Reverb to TR JM thoughts.
Thank you 10thx. I have a board for fender vibrolux (non reverb) in my stash. Maybe this is more easy to build than to modify my current princeton.