Not necessarily, and in any case you have the PI trimmer to iron that out.martin manning wrote: ↑Thu Feb 29, 2024 8:14 pmMy PI tube plates are about 10v apart; does this indicate a grossly mismatched tube?
2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- martin manning
- Posts: 13207
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
1 others liked this
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
- Raoul Duke
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
- Location: S.E. Mass.
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
Did the initial PI calibration and the trim pot only needed to move about 1 millimeter CW. Of course - I’ll verify once everything is hooked up and running.
Tomorrow I’ll finish up the preamp connections, heaters, and B+4 and 5.
Really looking forward to hearing this amp! I hope it’s close to what I’m expecting based on what I think I’m building here. I’ve listened to the first 3 generations’ demos plenty and will be thrilled with something somewhere in that (fairly wide) range. Fingers crossed
Tomorrow I’ll finish up the preamp connections, heaters, and B+4 and 5.
Really looking forward to hearing this amp! I hope it’s close to what I’m expecting based on what I think I’m building here. I’ve listened to the first 3 generations’ demos plenty and will be thrilled with something somewhere in that (fairly wide) range. Fingers crossed
- Raoul Duke
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
- Location: S.E. Mass.
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
Here’s a random new guy question:
Given the space and alignment issues I’m experiencing with this build, is it a bad idea to put the V1 and 2 terminal strips up on washers - allowing the plate leads to pass underneath - thus providing more separation and shortening them by 33-66%?
Anybody ever done this and regretted it or know of why it might not work?
Thanks in advance!
Given the space and alignment issues I’m experiencing with this build, is it a bad idea to put the V1 and 2 terminal strips up on washers - allowing the plate leads to pass underneath - thus providing more separation and shortening them by 33-66%?
Anybody ever done this and regretted it or know of why it might not work?
Thanks in advance!
- martin manning
- Posts: 13207
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
I don't see a problem doing that. You are not using the ground lug for anything, so making that connection a little less direct electrically doesn't matter.
- Raoul Duke
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
- Location: S.E. Mass.
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
Thanks Martin!
I’ve looked at the gut shots and don’t have the space for the lazy curves without encroaching on the following tube’s territory and really crowding things. I saw the layout shows direct lines but figured that was for simplicity in understanding and didn’t want to be too literal given my position on the learning curve; so I wanted to throw it out there and see.
I appreciate the input
Almost ready to make noise.
I’ve looked at the gut shots and don’t have the space for the lazy curves without encroaching on the following tube’s territory and really crowding things. I saw the layout shows direct lines but figured that was for simplicity in understanding and didn’t want to be too literal given my position on the learning curve; so I wanted to throw it out there and see.
I appreciate the input
Almost ready to make noise.
- martin manning
- Posts: 13207
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
2 others liked this
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
Its seems that HAD didn't develop that big loop style until a bit later. You're right, layout drawings are somewhat idealized, but hopefully they convey the essentials.
Turns out there's a font for your logo, "Steadmanesque."
Turns out there's a font for your logo, "Steadmanesque."
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
I've gotten where I've started doing that with ODS builds and haven't had an issue with it. I just use a longer #4 bolt to hold the tube socket in place and have the standoff attached between two nuts. I use some heavy wire cutters to clip off the unused center ground lug so I doesn't get in the way later. I have a 2nd Gen I'm working on now (Seems to be the trend around here!) I'll put more pictures up later, but you can see a bit of how I attach the standoffs in this image. I have had issues in past having to do longer runs or crimping lead wires around standoffs so I prefer to do this now.Raoul Duke wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 3:48 pm Here’s a random new guy question:
Given the space and alignment issues I’m experiencing with this build, is it a bad idea to put the V1 and 2 terminal strips up on washers - allowing the plate leads to pass underneath - thus providing more separation and shortening them by 33-66%?
Anybody ever done this and regretted it or know of why it might not work?
Thanks in advance!
Matt J.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
As a big Hunter S. Thompson fan I LOVE this!martin manning wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 4:57 pm Its seems that HAD didn't develop that big loop style until a bit later. You're right, layout drawings are somewhat idealized, but hopefully they convey the essentials.
Turns out there's a font for your logo, "Steadmanesque."
- Raoul Duke
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
- Location: S.E. Mass.
1 others liked this
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
Thank you both for the input!
Martin - I really like the logo idea Love RS’ artwork. He’s the only artist that could do HST justice.
Matt - saw your avatar a long time ago and knew our paths would cross eventually, lol.
Having a bit of a panic moment right now because I thought I had the references for the pins mixed up (the bA, K, RGs) but I think I’m ok. Just traced out what I did with the PI and I think I’m on track. Learning new stuff is “mind-bottling”, lol.
Thanks again guys!
Martin - I really like the logo idea Love RS’ artwork. He’s the only artist that could do HST justice.
Matt - saw your avatar a long time ago and knew our paths would cross eventually, lol.
Having a bit of a panic moment right now because I thought I had the references for the pins mixed up (the bA, K, RGs) but I think I’m ok. Just traced out what I did with the PI and I think I’m on track. Learning new stuff is “mind-bottling”, lol.
Thanks again guys!
- Raoul Duke
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
- Location: S.E. Mass.
1 others liked this
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
All right, just one more piece of co-ax for the OD CW and I think I’m there. Not the prettiest, but I’m learning.
It’ll have to wait til tomorrow - I’m going upstairs and having a beer; it’s been a busy week, lol.You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Raoul Duke
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
- Location: S.E. Mass.
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
Quick semi-off topic question:
If an unknown set of 6L6GC tubes is checked for shorts and only shows continuity on pins 2 and 7, how comfortable would you all feel trying them out?
Just found a set of tubes I was given because the previous owner put them in an amp and one tube was off by one pin (worn key in tube socket) and the amp blew its fuse immediately when switched on. I was going to tear them apart and make bias probes - but I checked out Frenchie’s video on testing with a DMM and the only continuity on both tubes was pins 2 and 7.
Thinking of trying them in this build… Would you?
If an unknown set of 6L6GC tubes is checked for shorts and only shows continuity on pins 2 and 7, how comfortable would you all feel trying them out?
Just found a set of tubes I was given because the previous owner put them in an amp and one tube was off by one pin (worn key in tube socket) and the amp blew its fuse immediately when switched on. I was going to tear them apart and make bias probes - but I checked out Frenchie’s video on testing with a DMM and the only continuity on both tubes was pins 2 and 7.
Thinking of trying them in this build… Would you?
Last edited by Raoul Duke on Sat Mar 02, 2024 1:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
That came out great, Raoul. Well done.
- ijedouglas
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 9:07 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
Nice work. Something to take note of, you may have done this already and the cap markings are incorrect, but 2nd/3rd Gen amps had all the caps outerfoil to the pots except for the bass capRaoul Duke wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 10:45 pm All right, just one more piece of co-ax for the OD CW and I think I’m there. Not the prettiest, but I’m learning.
IMG_0202.jpeg
It’ll have to wait til tomorrow - I’m going upstairs and having a beer; it’s been a busy week, lol.
Ian
- Raoul Duke
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
- Location: S.E. Mass.
1 others liked this
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
Thank you Sir! I appreciate your kind words!
I see the flaws - but it’s only my second scratch build and third overall - so if it sounds good, I’ll be real happy!
And of course, I couldn’t have done it without all the help I get from the good folks here! I appreciate everyone’s input immensely!
Thanks again
Last edited by Raoul Duke on Sat Mar 02, 2024 1:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Raoul Duke
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2022 1:00 am
- Location: S.E. Mass.
Re: 2nd Gen Build Started (that didn’t take long…)
Thanks Ian!ijedouglas wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 11:52 pmNice work. Something to take note of, you may have done this already and the cap markings are incorrect, but 2nd/3rd Gen amps had all the caps outerfoil to the pots except for the bass capRaoul Duke wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 10:45 pm All right, just one more piece of co-ax for the OD CW and I think I’m there. Not the prettiest, but I’m learning.
IMG_0202.jpeg
It’ll have to wait til tomorrow - I’m going upstairs and having a beer; it’s been a busy week, lol.
I did not know that and have followed the foil position of the 4th gens. I will definitely make note though; if this amp sounds like I think it should - I’ll probably build a more period correct one in the future.
The more I read about HAD, the more likely it is that I may try a total authentic version of something just for posterity. I have to improve my understanding and construction techniques first though, lol.