Fender output tranny identification

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
wescaster
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Mt.Vernon Oregon

Fender output tranny identification

Post by wescaster »

Hey do any of you guys know from a glance what year this Fender OT is?

I'm going to put it on the sell block and I want to get an idea of what it's worth. I believe it to be a silverface 8 ohm, but I'm not sure. Somebody put this in a Pro reverb I once restored and quite honestly...the Pro sounded better with this. :D

It says Fender on the top and the numbers are.. oo2855

606834

Thanks :!:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
FYL
Posts: 654
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:05 am

Re: Fender output tranny identification

Post by FYL »

Could be a Schumacher-sourced Fender 022855 aka 125A9A xformer. 4K pri, single 2-ohm sec, good for 40/50 watts. Possibly '78 vintage.

Worth maybe 80 to 120 USD in perfect working condition.

(Edit: corrected typo)
Last edited by FYL on Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
wescaster
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Mt.Vernon Oregon

Re: Fender output tranny identification

Post by wescaster »

Thanks, I'll give sombody a good deal on this on this forum. :wink:
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: Fender output tranny identification

Post by tubeswell »

Why the gap? (It is ultralinear or something?)
wescaster
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Mt.Vernon Oregon

Re: Fender output tranny identification

Post by wescaster »

It really is'nt a seperation between two sides. It's just a groove across the center. :? I don't know what that means.
User avatar
jelle
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Fender output tranny identification

Post by jelle »

I have seen that on fender BF OT's.

Nothing to worry about.

jelle
User avatar
Funkalicousgroove
Posts: 2232
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: Fender output tranny identification

Post by Funkalicousgroove »

it's a channel for mounting bolts, you can hold the bells on with 2 instead of 4 bolts if you were so inclined.

date is 34th week of 68 or 78, my guess is 78 since the leads are pvc instead of lacquered cloth but it's hard to be totally sure without the rest of the amp for reference.
Owner/Solder Jockey Bludotone Amp Works
solderstain
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:39 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Contact:

Re: Fender output tranny identification

Post by solderstain »

Funkalicousgroove wrote:date is 34th week of 68 or 78, my guess is 78 since the leads are pvc instead of lacquered cloth...
I'd say '68. Both my '66 and '67 Bassman OTs have PVC insulation on the leads, not cloth.
User avatar
FYL
Posts: 654
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:05 am

Re: Fender output tranny identification

Post by FYL »

I'd say '68. Both my '66 and '67 Bassman OTs have PVC insulation on the leads, not cloth.
Cloth leads on these, from a '73 SF BMR...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
solderstain
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:39 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Contact:

Re: Fender output tranny identification

Post by solderstain »

FYL wrote:
I'd say '68. Both my '66 and '67 Bassman OTs have PVC insulation on the leads, not cloth.
Cloth leads on these, from a '73 SF BMR...
The original OT on my '71 Pro Reverb has cloth-covered leads, but the one in your picture and the original from my Pro are different style/manufacture OTs than the one the OP shows. The one in the OP's picture is in the style and size of a Bassman OT.

Whatever... it's still a useful OT for some project. :wink:
wescaster
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:51 pm
Location: Mt.Vernon Oregon

Re: Fender output tranny identification

Post by wescaster »

Thanks for the input on my output guys.

How can I tell what the impedence is for sure?
Post Reply