LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
Here it is, cheap and simple!
https://www.tme.eu/Document/49ed538122e ... 61/lr8.pdf
https://www.tme.eu/Document/49ed538122e ... 61/lr8.pdf
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
Looks interesting. Hopefully somebody who knows more than me can post a circuit using this in an amp application.
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 4:25 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
1 others liked this
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
From the datasheet:
There's the rub. Even a pretty simple 18W Marshall type is gonna draw 3X that. That said, there is a way to use one of these in conjunction with a power mosfet circuit to create a regulator that will work well with B+ voltages and currents. This link is provisional but explains a way in which it might be done: https://wtfamps.com/2018/10/17/the-lr8- ... -circuits/. Its a wormhole that I dont have time for right now but searching "LM8 tube amps" or "B+ regulator" produces a lot of information to digest.The output current limit is typically 20mA
I build effects and amps and do custom builds to order. Boom.
Site: http://ballseffects.com/
Site: http://ballseffects.com/
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
There are a few high voltage regulators on the market now, similar to the LR8. I ran into them while researching for the agile high voltage output for the tube matcher thing in another thread. They all seem to have some issues for a B+ regulator.
For a stabilizer, it's hard to beat an N-channel MOSFET and a zener string in simplicity. It's not a very good regulator, but it makes for high currents and relatively stable output. The output voltage is close enough for tube amps. Circuit image here:
https://www.circuitlab.com/circuit/qcv8 ... regulator/
For a regulator, it's hard to beat an N-channel MOSFET a bipolar transistor, a zener, and a handful or Rs and Cs. Circuit image here:
https://www.electronicsandcommunication ... esign.html
Notice that the last is for a bipolar pass transistor, as I could not quickly find the MOSFET version. There are a couple of issues with this for changing to MOSFET and high voltage. First, you need the standard 100 ohm series gate resistor to avoid self oscillation at many megahertz, and a gate-source 12V zener to protect the gate. Second, the remaining bipolar needs to withstand the entire bulk supply voltage. I would use a 2N5401 for the bottom transistor, but add a string of voltage-sharing resistors and 5401s to divide down the bulk voltage to a manageable 100V or so per transistor. Same concepts, just some add-ons.
These are not as sexy as having a one-IC B+ reguator, but they have the advantage that they're cheap and they work, as well as being highly available.
For a stabilizer, it's hard to beat an N-channel MOSFET and a zener string in simplicity. It's not a very good regulator, but it makes for high currents and relatively stable output. The output voltage is close enough for tube amps. Circuit image here:
https://www.circuitlab.com/circuit/qcv8 ... regulator/
For a regulator, it's hard to beat an N-channel MOSFET a bipolar transistor, a zener, and a handful or Rs and Cs. Circuit image here:
https://www.electronicsandcommunication ... esign.html
Notice that the last is for a bipolar pass transistor, as I could not quickly find the MOSFET version. There are a couple of issues with this for changing to MOSFET and high voltage. First, you need the standard 100 ohm series gate resistor to avoid self oscillation at many megahertz, and a gate-source 12V zener to protect the gate. Second, the remaining bipolar needs to withstand the entire bulk supply voltage. I would use a 2N5401 for the bottom transistor, but add a string of voltage-sharing resistors and 5401s to divide down the bulk voltage to a manageable 100V or so per transistor. Same concepts, just some add-ons.
These are not as sexy as having a one-IC B+ reguator, but they have the advantage that they're cheap and they work, as well as being highly available.
Last edited by R.G. on Tue Dec 15, 2020 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
Could work in preampsDr Tony Balls wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 2:43 pm From the datasheet:
There's the rub. Even a pretty simple 18W Marshall type is gonna draw 3X that. That said, there is a way to use one of these in conjunction with a power mosfet circuit to create a regulator that will work well with B+ voltages and currents. This link is provisional but explains a way in which it might be done: https://wtfamps.com/2018/10/17/the-lr8- ... -circuits/. Its a wormhole that I dont have time for right now but searching "LM8 tube amps" or "B+ regulator" produces a lot of information to digest.The output current limit is typically 20mA
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:49 pm
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
Worse yet, that 20 mA is only good when Vin - Vout- = 12 volts. It tapers down to 0.5 mA when Vin - Vout = 450v.Dr Tony Balls wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 2:43 pm From the datasheet:
There's the rub. Even a pretty simple 18W Marshall type is gonna draw 3X that.The output current limit is typically 20mA
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
I don't think that stabilizing screens and plates of the output tubes is a good idea.
On top of that, there's always the old trick to increase the current of voltage regulators.
On top of that, there's always the old trick to increase the current of voltage regulators.
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
The only problem with these is when they fail, they fail catastrophically, and you usually have to replace everything (he says, having unsoldered way too many small Zeners from crappy PCBs).
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
True. However, there is much to be improved about the circuit. "Hard to beat" in my mind includes at least a partial consideration of the audience. This is a very mixed audience I can and have designed variations of that circuit that are much less prone to failure. But while there are some here who like a good delve into a complex circuit, there are others whose eyes glaze over after three non-resistor or cap parts.
More importantly, it's not a regulator in that it has no active correction for changes. It's a pretty good stabilizer.
I would add a MOSFET current limiter to it, so load faults can't make it evaporate, and probably worry more about the zener string. Actually, zeners are not needed, just a fixed voltage source. Zeners are just handiest. I've found some circuits that use the TL431 precision adjustable reference as a reference and error amplifier for a big MOSFET perched several hundred volts in the air. I'm not sure I trust that yet, though.
More importantly, it's not a regulator in that it has no active correction for changes. It's a pretty good stabilizer.
I would add a MOSFET current limiter to it, so load faults can't make it evaporate, and probably worry more about the zener string. Actually, zeners are not needed, just a fixed voltage source. Zeners are just handiest. I've found some circuits that use the TL431 precision adjustable reference as a reference and error amplifier for a big MOSFET perched several hundred volts in the air. I'm not sure I trust that yet, though.
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
The MOSFET supply you came up with for me a while back works a treat, but would be a bit of a bear to wire on a turret board.
- Kagliostro
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:09 am
- Location: Italy
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
You can see a possible LR8 (preamp) application here.
https://diyaudioprojects.com/Tubes/EL84 ... lock-Amps/
I built two of these for my brother quite a bit ago and they are running just fine and sound fabulous.
From what I remember - it was PITA sourcing them in EU
Niki
https://diyaudioprojects.com/Tubes/EL84 ... lock-Amps/
I built two of these for my brother quite a bit ago and they are running just fine and sound fabulous.
From what I remember - it was PITA sourcing them in EU
Niki
- Kagliostro
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:09 am
- Location: Italy
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
Not difficult to be find at 50c (61c with tax)
https://it.rs-online.com/web/p/regolato ... i/8293266/
Told that I must specify that I think it will be better used in an HiFi circuit
in a guitar amp a solid B+ on preamp tubes may be not what you would like to have
but this is my opinion
K
https://it.rs-online.com/web/p/regolato ... i/8293266/
Told that I must specify that I think it will be better used in an HiFi circuit
in a guitar amp a solid B+ on preamp tubes may be not what you would like to have
but this is my opinion
K
Re: LR8: an LM317 on steroids to stabilize up to 450 V
I really depends. I have one preamp where I have stabilized B+ and I like it because it gives you stable tone whatever voltage you have.
Drawback is that you don't have interaction on the power supply with the power amp, but no rack unit preamp has it.
Kagliostro highlighted the very advantage of it: it's so cheap that you can even use one for every (pair) of stage(s) and set the voltage you prefer for each one.
In a complete amp I would use it for the first stage, where S/N is more important.
Then Hi-Fi opens way more applications, of course.
Drawback is that you don't have interaction on the power supply with the power amp, but no rack unit preamp has it.
Kagliostro highlighted the very advantage of it: it's so cheap that you can even use one for every (pair) of stage(s) and set the voltage you prefer for each one.
In a complete amp I would use it for the first stage, where S/N is more important.
Then Hi-Fi opens way more applications, of course.