loading 4x6v6

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Andy Le Blanc
Posts: 2582
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:16 am
Location: central Maine

loading 4x6v6

Post by Andy Le Blanc »

Anybody have practical experience with quads of 6v6?
What load would 4 x 6v6 like to see?
lazymaryamps
wicker
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 6:43 pm
Location: Poland

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by wicker »

4k
Andy Le Blanc
Posts: 2582
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:16 am
Location: central Maine

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by Andy Le Blanc »

I figured that too, I just haven't fiddled with it yet, how far down from 4k
can you go before you start to run into practical issue's, 3k, 3.5k.
I know there's a sweet spot for power vs. distortion in there somewhere.
Or is it a little higher?
lazymaryamps
User avatar
dobbhill
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:04 am
Location: Louisiana

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by dobbhill »

My reading, not direct experience, tells me that optimum load depends upon B+. Also, according to Trainwreck application, optimum textbook load does not dictate "best" tone. Mr. Fischer used 5.2-6.6K trannies on a pair of EL34, where Marshall and Dynaco used 4.3K. He also said you could run 6V6 in those same amps. I guess guitar tone is not the same as Hi-Fi tone, and losing a few watts in preference to better tone and feel is an acceptable trade-off.
I don't really know anything, just repeating things I read. I tend to follow what others have done successfully.
I'm also OK with being wrong. It helps when trying to stay married.....
D
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.......
funkmeblue
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:17 am
Location: akron, ohio

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by funkmeblue »

the dynaco 470 would be awesome for this use if you are in the "tweed" voltage range. Tweed deluxe uses an 8k tranny and half of that is 4......now if your in black face voltage range which would be a 6.6k tranny, I would use a 3.3k tranny.
anything worth doing, is worth doing right
Andy Le Blanc
Posts: 2582
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:16 am
Location: central Maine

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by Andy Le Blanc »

That the thing, where is the inside of the ballpark anyway.
There really is a trade off for voltage and load. The relative distortion figure
to power change together.
lazymaryamps
Jana
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:40 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by Jana »

3.5 to 4K.
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by tubeswell »

Anywhere between 2k5 and 6k6 will work, with something between 3k5 and 5k sounding good.

I have run 6V6 pairs from anywhere between 5k to 10k. At 5k 370V on the plates they sound really good - compressed, although not as powerful as 8k. (That's why I say you could run a quad of 6V6 at 2k5.)
wicker
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 6:43 pm
Location: Poland

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by wicker »

as mentioned this is not hifi, technically it would be good 3.8-4.2 probably, but who cares :P in most guitar amps power tubes (and preamp too) are often put to it's limits and everybody seems to be happy, cos it's all about the TONE ; )
I would suggest to try wi Ra that would fit both for quad 6v6 and 6l6,el34 as well (most will do that)
User avatar
Phil_S
Posts: 5945
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by Phil_S »

If you've got free time on your hands or have trouble sleeping :
http://www.siteswithstyle.com/VoltSecon ... _LINE.html
There's a bucket load of stuff on load lines here:
http://greygum.net/sbench/sbench101/
Andy Le Blanc
Posts: 2582
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:16 am
Location: central Maine

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by Andy Le Blanc »

awesome thank you. The next issue is a PT 500ct 300-350ma.

one electron BFT-1B?
lazymaryamps
User avatar
Phil_S
Posts: 5945
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by Phil_S »

If I had that BFT 250-0-250 300ma, I'd look to build something with a sextet or octet of 6AQ5, 6V6, or EL84, 60-80W range. If it can handle the current requirement for the 8-pack (you'll need an aircraft carrier size chassis and possible a supplemental filament tranny, depending) you ought to be able to find a 2K or 2.5 OT that's perfect for the job and that won't cost you an arm and a leg, because who uses a 2K OT rated for 80w? There must be one around somewhere. Same probably for the 6-pack...I think you'd be good with an OT of 2.5K or even 3K, 3.5K. Finding a ~3K rated for 60W should be easier. Any project of this type grows arms and legs quickly.

You have a roadie to help you carry it around?
Andy Le Blanc
Posts: 2582
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:16 am
Location: central Maine

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by Andy Le Blanc »

Depends upon how you load it, I'm cheap, could use any 4k or 2k opt
with proper loading. I should be able to push 6v6 to 16w total dissipation for
each device, with a design max 350v plate voltage, static.

So..... the one electron product is rated 520v ct, 360 ma

after full wave rectification I should have around 370v, not gonna push volts.

It should consume 43ma per tube static, 170ma total at idle. The cheesiest
twin PT I can find is 310ma/690ct, which after full wave rectification is
around 490v. A deluxe is around 420v at the plates.

I do not want a fender tone, I will not be going for a fixed bias , high plate
voltage, feed back neutered turd.
lazymaryamps
Jana
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:40 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by Jana »

I have a couple of 2.5K OT rated at 150 watts continuous. :)
Andy Le Blanc
Posts: 2582
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:16 am
Location: central Maine

Re: loading 4x6v6

Post by Andy Le Blanc »

twin opt = 2k
marshal 100 w generic opt = 1.7k
marshal jcm 900/2000 opt = 1.75k

Like I said, CHEAP, loading is everything, and it works. 4k, 3.4k and 3.5k.
lazymaryamps
Post Reply