Recap check - old fender

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
angelodp
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:45 am
Location: L.A.

Recap check - old fender

Post by angelodp »

Need a set of experienced eyes on this please. The top diagram is the existing 6G4 filter cap setup. I am looking at going with the lower diagram. I t was suggested that I try 100uf/350v for the first two caps in series with a 220k 1 w resistor in parallel on each cap.

The original schemo calls for 56K where that 28k resistor is now. Thats what I found in the amp. Leave that 28k on the yellow wire?

white dots are the pass through to the inside of the chassis.


[IMG:792:612]http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii9/ ... layout.jpg[/img]
[IMG:648:501]http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii9/ ... -recap.jpg[/img]
User avatar
Dr-Joned
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: The Great South, USA

Re: Recap check - old fender

Post by Dr-Joned »

The capacitor on the far right should have the polarity reversed. Otherwise it looks ok.
I Think I Think Too Much !
User avatar
Phil_S
Posts: 5952
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Recap check - old fender

Post by Phil_S »

The 220K resistors are bleed resistors. They are there as a safety measure. After you turn off the amp, these will bleed the caps. It takes a few minutes for them to work. Otherwise, they don't affect anything.

A pair of 100uf caps in series is 50uf. The limit for a GZ34 is 60uf, so that should be fine. The schematic shows a pair of 20uf in parallel, wich is 40uF. I'm not sure you'd notice much difference. It's more likely you'll notice the difference because the caps have been renewed. Remember to use caps of adequate voltage rating.
User avatar
angelodp
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:45 am
Location: L.A.

corrected -

Post by angelodp »

I missed that polarity, thanks. Phil, so those bleeders are done correctly? In the Dlite they bridge the eyelets. Could it be done that way as well? The 100uf are 350v but they feed a 458v node. I understand that the voltage is
summed when they are in series.

[IMG:648:501]http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii9/ ... ecap-1.jpg[/img]

or this Alternate method like the Dlite

Ok thanks Martin.

[IMG:648:501]http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii9/ ... ecap-4.jpg[/img]
Last edited by angelodp on Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 13250
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: corrected

Post by martin manning »

angelodp wrote:In the Dlite they bridge the eyelets. Could it be done that way as well?
Yes, put the cap on the far right back the way you had it (positive end up), move the resistors so they bridge the eyelets top and bottom, and then move the blue jumper so that it goes from lower left to upper right. The ground wire now goes back where it was in the original layout, extreme lower right.

MPM

(edited for grammar)
Last edited by martin manning on Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
FYL
Posts: 654
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:05 am

Re: Recap check - old fender

Post by FYL »

The 220K resistors are bleed resistors.
Not only: they balance the two caps by giving a current path, thus mitigating leakage resistance. As a rule of thumb those R's should pass 1 mA or so for most MI amps, roughly x10 max cap current leakage.
User avatar
angelodp
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:45 am
Location: L.A.

Re-corrected

Post by angelodp »

Thanks guys.. Looks like I am there.
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Recap check - old fender

Post by Structo »

Yes but the schematic has two 20uF 600v caps in parallel for the first filter.

I would agree it may be a better filter having the two caps in series but to be original they are in parallel with no resistors.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 13250
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Recap check - old fender

Post by martin manning »

angelodp wrote:The original schemo calls for 56K where that 28k resistor is now. Thats what I found in the amp. Leave that 28k on the yellow wire?
This didn't get addressed... You should keep the resistors as they are.

MPM
RightLurker
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Recap check - old fender

Post by RightLurker »

For those who may be interested, Weber VST stocks 20uf 600 volt electrolytic caps, that seem to work fine in my Bassman.
User avatar
angelodp
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:45 am
Location: L.A.

great info

Post by angelodp »

RightLurker, great info and they are quite reasonably priced at $2.00 each

WOW!! and you say they work fine in your rig. Thats hard to beat. One wonders why these caps range so much in price $12.00 for the Sprague Atom!
tictac
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 4:42 am

Re: Recap check - old fender

Post by tictac »

Pre-CBS Fenders do not always match their respective schematics. Leo was always tweaking... I've seen some unusual stuff from time to time, like a blonde Showman with a plate load resistor on V1 consisting of a 220k and 100k in parallel, the eyelet boards was even modified for this tweak, it was stock, but not on the schematic...

If you find your old Fender with different value components as built from the factory why not leave them as is, you've got a bit of Fender amp history there!

TT
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Recap check - old fender

Post by Structo »

Yeah, I have read that if Fender was out of a certain part, instead of waiting for the part to arrive they would simply substitute another value if it wasn't critical to the amps operation.

Using up old tube charts before making new ones is another classic Leo move.

A very frugal man. :wink:
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
User avatar
angelodp
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:45 am
Location: L.A.

original

Post by angelodp »

Tictac, yes indeed I am trying to stay with the all of the original stuff if I can. I was advised to change out the filter caps as they are 50+ years old. The small cap on the intensity knob seemed to be leaking so I pulled it. I also have an output tranny that is wrecked looking but runs fine. It has been epoxied and gooped. Is there a good reason to replace it. It sounds fine.
[IMG:1440:1080]http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii9/ ... uperOT.jpg[/img]
User avatar
Phil_S
Posts: 5952
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: original

Post by Phil_S »

angelodp wrote: I also have an output tranny that is wrecked looking but runs fine. It has been epoxied and gooped. Is there a good reason to replace it. It sounds fine.
Don't fix it until it's broken. Leave it alone.
Post Reply