Pentode vs Cathode follower for compression
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Pentode vs Cathode follower for compression
I’m contemplating whether I should use a pentode or a cathode follower for some compression in my next build. Has anyone tried both, and if so, what’s the conclusion?
I’d imagine a CF has the possibility to create a stronger effect (depending on Rk value) than a pentode.
I’d imagine a CF has the possibility to create a stronger effect (depending on Rk value) than a pentode.
Re: Pentode vs Cathode follower for compression
those experiments you build on wooden plank for preamp and output and experiment how you want.. instead of asking and loosing time and life, you can get all answers quickly
Re: Pentode vs Cathode follower for compression
Agreed, no one knows what sounds right to you, like you. While you are at it, why not make a pentode cathode follower? Can even add a triode switch and see what you like better.
Re: Pentode vs Cathode follower for compression
Hm yeah I guess I’ll just do it.. Thanks guys.
Re: Pentode vs Cathode follower for compression
Post results.
Tube junkie that aspires to become a tri-state bidirectional buss driver.
Re: Pentode vs Cathode follower for compression
I've done 12A_7 triodes with both tube and mosfet cathode followers. They have offered some nice compression and smooth tone if dialed in right.
I've done 5879 pentodes, 6AU6, and 5654 pentodes. I like all of them but the 5879 is my favorite. I think it gives a FAT tone but my experience is that it adds more of a chimey tone than compression. What I mean by chimey is sort of hard to describe so take that word with a grain of salt as it could be misleading with how you interpret chimey in your thinking.
I have done 5879 pentodes with 12A_7 and mosfet cathode followers in overdrive channels. I thought they sounded pretty smooth and offered some nice compression.
I've used 5879 as V1 tubes with some frequency. I've used them also in overdrive channels. It's a nice tube. I bought enough of them to last me the rest of my life. I liked the 5654 tube also but IIRC, it had a lower max voltage on the plates?
With respect, 10thtx
I've done 5879 pentodes, 6AU6, and 5654 pentodes. I like all of them but the 5879 is my favorite. I think it gives a FAT tone but my experience is that it adds more of a chimey tone than compression. What I mean by chimey is sort of hard to describe so take that word with a grain of salt as it could be misleading with how you interpret chimey in your thinking.
I have done 5879 pentodes with 12A_7 and mosfet cathode followers in overdrive channels. I thought they sounded pretty smooth and offered some nice compression.
I've used 5879 as V1 tubes with some frequency. I've used them also in overdrive channels. It's a nice tube. I bought enough of them to last me the rest of my life. I liked the 5654 tube also but IIRC, it had a lower max voltage on the plates?
With respect, 10thtx
Re: Pentode vs Cathode follower for compression
Agreed, I share your penchant for 5879 use. Best distortion tube made. As a first stage they are bright and sweet. A nice flavor change from the ubiquitous ax7.
They would enjoy more widespread use if Dumble had discovered them.
They would enjoy more widespread use if Dumble had discovered them.
Tube junkie that aspires to become a tri-state bidirectional buss driver.
Re: Pentode vs Cathode follower for compression
Thanks, good stuff. Pentodes are sometimes described as glassy or chimey so that makes sense. The interesting German kit Madamp Blues G3 uses a CF with a pentode driver, which also has a gain/compression control on its screen. I would have put the pentode later for better effect though.10thTx wrote: ↑Fri Sep 15, 2023 9:29 pm I've done 12A_7 triodes with both tube and mosfet cathode followers. They have offered some nice compression and smooth tone if dialed in right.
I've done 5879 pentodes, 6AU6, and 5654 pentodes. I like all of them but the 5879 is my favorite. I think it gives a FAT tone but my experience is that it adds more of a chimey tone than compression. What I mean by chimey is sort of hard to describe so take that word with a grain of salt as it could be misleading with how you interpret chimey in your thinking.
I have done 5879 pentodes with 12A_7 and mosfet cathode followers in overdrive channels. I thought they sounded pretty smooth and offered some nice compression.
I've used 5879 as V1 tubes with some frequency. I've used them also in overdrive channels. It's a nice tube. I bought enough of them to last me the rest of my life. I liked the 5654 tube also but IIRC, it had a lower max voltage on the plates?
With respect, 10thtx
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Pentode vs Cathode follower for compression
I have a 5879 as V1 in ch1 and a 12ax7 in ch2 in a Gibson GA19/20 inspired amp I built, cause I wanted to hear the difference, and honestly the only difference (as V1) to me is lower gain on the 5879.
Re: Pentode vs Cathode follower for compression
As always, circuitry dependent.
Tube junkie that aspires to become a tri-state bidirectional buss driver.