A better bias pot?
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 4:25 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
1 others liked this
A better bias pot?
What are people here using for bias pots? I've been using the CTS screwdriver-adjustable ones but they only come in 10K and I find that range a bit limiting. Does anyone have a favorite bias pot option they're using? I like to have things externally adjustable so panel-mount is key.
I build effects and amps and do custom builds to order. Boom.
Site: http://ballseffects.com/
Site: http://ballseffects.com/
Re: A better bias pot?
The range is usually determined by the circuit rather than by the value of the pot. That is, a sufficient range can almost always be attained with a 10k pot if the circuit is designed properly.Dr Tony Balls wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 3:47 pm What are people here using for bias pots? I've been using the CTS screwdriver-adjustable ones but they only come in 10K and I find that range a bit limiting. Does anyone have a favorite bias pot option they're using? I like to have things externally adjustable so panel-mount is key.
-
- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:04 am
- Location: Santa Cruz, CA
1 others liked this
Re: A better bias pot?
Or if you don’t want to change a thing about the rest of the circuit you can always pop a higher value track into the pot casing . Simple enoughTen Over wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 3:59 pmThe range is usually determined by the circuit rather than by the value of the pot. That is, a sufficient range can almost always be attained with a 10k pot if the circuit is designed properly.Dr Tony Balls wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 3:47 pm What are people here using for bias pots? I've been using the CTS screwdriver-adjustable ones but they only come in 10K and I find that range a bit limiting. Does anyone have a favorite bias pot option they're using? I like to have things externally adjustable so panel-mount is key.
Charlie
Re: A better bias pot?
Yep - done it many times. The 450 series CTS pots are easy to open up and change resistance tracks in.WhopperPlate wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 4:16 pmOr if you don’t want to change a thing about the rest of the circuit you can always pop a higher value track into the pot casing . Simple enoughTen Over wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 3:59 pmThe range is usually determined by the circuit rather than by the value of the pot. That is, a sufficient range can almost always be attained with a 10k pot if the circuit is designed properly.Dr Tony Balls wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 3:47 pm What are people here using for bias pots? I've been using the CTS screwdriver-adjustable ones but they only come in 10K and I find that range a bit limiting. Does anyone have a favorite bias pot option they're using? I like to have things externally adjustable so panel-mount is key.
cheers,
Jack Briggs
Briggs Guitars
Briggs Guitars
-
- Posts: 4576
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
- Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.
Re: A better bias pot?
You do not want to use a pot in the first place you want to take advantage of using a 20 turn Ciramic trimmer in the resistance value that you need.
There far more accurate and they do not drift.
There far more accurate and they do not drift.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!
Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!
Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 4:25 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Re: A better bias pot?
Well, do you care to share how to extend range with a 10K pot? I tend to use something like this Dynaco example, but in about every example I can think of there's a simple voltage divider being used to dial in bias voltage. Thus the pot is only able to adjust R1 or R2 +/- 5KTen Over wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 3:59 pmThe range is usually determined by the circuit rather than by the value of the pot. That is, a sufficient range can almost always be attained with a 10k pot if the circuit is designed properly.Dr Tony Balls wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2023 3:47 pm What are people here using for bias pots? I've been using the CTS screwdriver-adjustable ones but they only come in 10K and I find that range a bit limiting. Does anyone have a favorite bias pot option they're using? I like to have things externally adjustable so panel-mount is key.
I build effects and amps and do custom builds to order. Boom.
Site: http://ballseffects.com/
Site: http://ballseffects.com/
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 4:25 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Re: A better bias pot?
Right I know about this option bu what i'm really looking for is something that is panel mount so it could be adjusted from the exterior of a chassis.
I build effects and amps and do custom builds to order. Boom.
Site: http://ballseffects.com/
Site: http://ballseffects.com/
Re: A better bias pot?
The 10K pot that Fender used is capable of providing proper bias range for Deluxe Reverb up to Twin Reverb simply by slightly changing the ACV input and the tail resistor on the pot. And the Fender pot can be adjusted internally or externally. Sounds like you already have the ultimate pot.
The Dynaco circuit (Sunn uses the same) you posted uses a 10K pot. Assuming -60vdc input allows the bias pot to swing between -37v and -58v. That's a respectable voltage range.
The Dynaco circuit (Sunn uses the same) you posted uses a 10K pot. Assuming -60vdc input allows the bias pot to swing between -37v and -58v. That's a respectable voltage range.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 4:25 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
1 others liked this
Re: A better bias pot?
Perhaps my problem has more to do with tube variability than anything else. I recently built an amp for a guy that was supplying his own tubes. I built it at my shop, tested and configured with a set of JJ 6L6GCs for an optimal bias setting at 40mA (60% dissipation) +/- 7mA (50% - 70%). I shipped it to him without tubes and on install he had a vintage set of JAN 6LCGC where the lowest he could set it was 52mA, and another vintage set got him a high of 32mA. A set of JJs was right on the money, though. So while Fender, Dynaco, Sunn, etc's use of the 10K pot was fine at the time, tube tolerances were also much tighter. A slightly larger (25K, say) bias pot would help adjust for a wider range of tube tolerances in the current market.sluckey wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2023 3:25 pm The 10K pot that Fender used is capable of providing proper bias range for Deluxe Reverb up to Twin Reverb simply by slightly changing the ACV input and the tail resistor on the pot. And the Fender pot can be adjusted internally or externally. Sounds like you already have the ultimate pot.
The Dynaco circuit (Sunn uses the same) you posted uses a 10K pot. Assuming -60vdc input allows the bias pot to swing between -37v and -58v. That's a respectable voltage range.
I build effects and amps and do custom builds to order. Boom.
Site: http://ballseffects.com/
Site: http://ballseffects.com/
Re: A better bias pot?
Make the other resistors smaller.Dr Tony Balls wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2023 2:30 pm Well, do you care to share how to extend range with a 10K pot?
Re: A better bias pot?
There is only a 5V difference in the bias voltage between 50% and 70% dissipation for a bogey 6L6GC with 400-some-odd volts on the plate and screen grid. Did you build a bias circuit that only had a 5V swing?Dr Tony Balls wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2023 4:18 pm Perhaps my problem has more to do with tube variability than anything else. I recently built an amp for a guy that was supplying his own tubes. I built it at my shop, tested and configured with a set of JJ 6L6GCs for an optimal bias setting at 40mA (60% dissipation) +/- 7mA (50% - 70%). I shipped it to him without tubes and on install he had a vintage set of JAN 6LCGC where the lowest he could set it was 52mA, and another vintage set got him a high of 32mA. A set of JJs was right on the money, though. So while Fender, Dynaco, Sunn, etc's use of the 10K pot was fine at the time, tube tolerances were also much tighter. A slightly larger (25K, say) bias pot would help adjust for a wider range of tube tolerances in the current market.
What is the RMS AC voltage powering the bias circuit and where is it coming from?
Re: A better bias pot?
To answer OPs question I like to use the Bourns 50K precision trimpots. I just completed a dual bias circuit for a 6V6 amp and it gives me as low as 10-12 up to 40+ mA of bias adjustment, that’s a huge range that guarantees I can bias any 6V6 on the planet. Can’t give exact numbers because the particular trimpots I used on this build don’t have a firm end to the screw travel and I don’t want to strip them.
Re: A better bias pot?
They do have an end of travel. You won't strip them. You should be able to feel a click when you reach either end. If you listen closely, you can probably even hear a slight click.
Re: A better bias pot?
Designing with the 10k pot makes it easy to Keep the total resistance low, as seen by the power tube grids, preventing slightly gassy tubes from thermal runaway.
Tube junkie that aspires to become a tri-state bidirectional buss driver.
Re: A better bias pot?
And to make the higher resistance bias circuit even worse, all of the current from all of the power tube grids flows through the bias circuit making its effective resistance significantly higher.