Tube effects loop

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
audiosalvage
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2018 8:29 pm

Tube effects loop

Post by audiosalvage »

So I've successfully built and implemented this loop circuit. My question is which tube to boost the return, ecc832 or ecc823. I just need a double check but I would think the latter.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
maxkracht
Posts: 595
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 7:18 pm
Location: Iowa, USA

Re: Tube effects loop

Post by maxkracht »

https://www.jj-electronic.com/en/ecc832-12dw7 pins 123 are lower gain on a, 832/dw7 opposite on the 823
Dennis Perusse
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat May 27, 2023 1:37 am
Location: Amesbury Mass

Re: Tube effects loop

Post by Dennis Perusse »

Hello,


Quick question on this. I have Merlin's book so I went back to it to reread that page that was listed. Now he uses a 12ax7 in his version. Now, you want to use a 12dw7 which I know has one side as a 12au7 and the other side as a 12aX7. If I may ask as to why do you want to use a 12dw7 in place of what Merlin uses in his version? Would their be other sonic characteristics in this apart from the signal going in with less gain then getting recovered with a higher gain?

The PTP layout looks really good here, but I am a bit confused on the tube choice.

Dennis
User avatar
TUBEDUDE
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Mastersville

Re: Tube effects loop

Post by TUBEDUDE »

It's not about the gain per se. The 12DW7 optimizes the driver and recovery functions.
The AX side provides high gain for the recovery signal. The AU side provides a low impedance output capable of driving the cable without high frequency loss due to cable capacitance.
Tube junkie that aspires to become a tri-state bidirectional buss driver.
Ten Over
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 5:27 pm
Location: Central California

Re: Tube effects loop

Post by Ten Over »

audiosalvage wrote: Thu Feb 08, 2024 10:33 pm So I've successfully built and implemented this loop circuit. My question is which tube to boost the return, ecc832 or ecc823. I just need a double check but I would think the latter.
ECC823, but that is a little bit of a rare bird that could go extinct at any time. Why not lay it out for a standard 12DW7?
Ten Over
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 5:27 pm
Location: Central California

Re: Tube effects loop

Post by Ten Over »

TUBEDUDE wrote: Fri Feb 23, 2024 12:22 pm It's not about the gain per se. The 12DW7 optimizes the driver and recovery functions.
The AX side provides high gain for the recovery signal. The AU side provides a low impedance output capable of driving the cable without high frequency loss due to cable capacitance.
You might want to check my math because it appears to me as though a 12AU7 will result in an output impedance at the cathode of 1.384k while the 12AX7 results in 0.85k, which would make a 12AX7 the better choice for driving capacitive loads.
User avatar
TUBEDUDE
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Mastersville

Re: Tube effects loop

Post by TUBEDUDE »

I guess I'd have to see your math. This loop uses a cathode follower topology doesn’t it?
Tube junkie that aspires to become a tri-state bidirectional buss driver.
Ten Over
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 5:27 pm
Location: Central California

Re: Tube effects loop

Post by Ten Over »

TUBEDUDE wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:11 pm This loop uses a cathode follower topology doesn’t it?
I believe it looks something like this:
Tube Loop Merlin audiosalvage.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ten Over
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon May 25, 2015 5:27 pm
Location: Central California

Re: Tube effects loop

Post by Ten Over »

TUBEDUDE wrote: Tue Feb 27, 2024 12:11 pm I guess I'd have to see your math.
I used a mu of 100 and an internal anode impedance of 62.5k for the 12AX7. I used a mu of 17 and an internal anode impedance of 7.7k for the 12AU7. The external cathode resistance is 2.2k in parallel with the 10k pot for a total of 1.8k. The 1M grid leak resistor is big enough to ignore.
CF 51 PNG.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
TUBEDUDE
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:23 pm
Location: Mastersville

Re: Tube effects loop

Post by TUBEDUDE »

Thanks for the thorough explanation. The grid leak is 15k rather than 1M.
Tube junkie that aspires to become a tri-state bidirectional buss driver.
Post Reply