Frankly, I'd rather be PISSED OFF. Some of my best rhetoric has been composed in that state.CaseyJones wrote: Pissed off or pissed on it all makes for a lively discussion.
Pissed on, I'm just lookin' to change my clothes
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Frankly, I'd rather be PISSED OFF. Some of my best rhetoric has been composed in that state.CaseyJones wrote: Pissed off or pissed on it all makes for a lively discussion.
Me too. It builds character. It's among those things that if they don't kill you hopefully it will make you stronger.Tubetwang wrote:I've been tortured,
Tubetwang wrote:had paralitic Polio at 10/spent one year in a bedcast,
Migraine sufferer since something heavy landed on my head. I can tolerate any level of noise, it's light I can't stand.Tubetwang wrote:Migraine sufferer since 15,
Don't know about that one. Maybe if we had socialized medicine here they'd add that to my list.Tubetwang wrote:have Post-Polio-Syndrome,
I keep wondering about that. Refer to "if we had socialized medicine here".Tubetwang wrote:took early retirement at 50 because diagnosed with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
As a baby boomer I think I was taught a lot of values lost on the younger generations.
It's a busy world these days and teaching kids to respect others seems to have been lost in the shuffle.
A recent study have shown that each and every generation since 1920 said of younger generations that "they were worst then them" in each and every field: writting skills, science, math, ethics, etc. Besides, I personnally consider that bagging the whole "new generations" with such generalization to be a lack of respect in and of itself.I'm only 38, but I wasn't raised to be as disrespectful as much of our younger generation has become. A lot of this can be attributed to the dismantling of "The New Deal" that built our middle class to be strong and prosperous. Families could live very comfortably on one income. Now most every family has to rely on dual incomes and/or multiple jobs to get by. This generation (including me to some extent) was raised by our television networks and video game consoles. Parents need to be afford the time to raise their kids in a proper manner, but that's not as important as rewarding CEOs and other Corp Execs with 7 figure bonuses, massive options, grants, warrants, etc.
I'm not saying my generation is better than others, I am only pointing out the degeneration of our society.Jack wrote:As a baby boomer I think I was taught a lot of values lost on the younger generations.
It's a busy world these days and teaching kids to respect others seems to have been lost in the shuffle.A recent study have shown that each and every generation since 1920 said of younger generations that "they were worst then them" in each and every field: writting skills, science, math, ethics, etc. Besides, I personnally consider that bagging the whole "new generations" with such generalization to be a lack of respect in and of itself.I'm only 38, but I wasn't raised to be as disrespectful as much of our younger generation has become. A lot of this can be attributed to the dismantling of "The New Deal" that built our middle class to be strong and prosperous. Families could live very comfortably on one income. Now most every family has to rely on dual incomes and/or multiple jobs to get by. This generation (including me to some extent) was raised by our television networks and video game consoles. Parents need to be afford the time to raise their kids in a proper manner, but that's not as important as rewarding CEOs and other Corp Execs with 7 figure bonuses, massive options, grants, warrants, etc.
Sorry but stuff like that pisses me off! That goddamn "Our generation rules the other sucks!!!" insert puke emoticon. (And don't forget YOU were the ones to raise them like that )
Cool! Then you're ready. Good plan gettin' outta California, that place is NUTS!dartanion wrote:About the comments about not knowing rural life, I grew up in a rural area and have lived in rural areas post leaving home. I actually prefer living in the sticks. I grew up in Minnesota, so I also know there is a lot great land available there, but since I spent 30 years between living in MN, IA, and WI; I can live elsewhere now.
I am a greenie and have been for most of my life. I drive small fuel efficient vehicles (even a hybrid now that gets 45-50 mpg), my next one to be a diesel so that I can make my own fuel My home remodel was done with mostly green materials (soy based insulation, passive solar, dual pane low E windows and doors, hemp based countertops, recycled glass tiles, etc.). I am politically active and vote in every primary and election as well as keep in touch with my representatives in local, state, and federal government. I became vegan after realizing the big picture effects of corporate farming. I contribute to numerous charities that support my views. Blah, blah, blah! I know that I cannot save the world alone, but if I can get a few others around me to make small changes, then I am having a positive effect on society.
Yeah, but our generation RULES and your generation SUCKS!!!Jack wrote:As a baby boomer I think I was taught a lot of values lost on the younger generations.
It's a busy world these days and teaching kids to respect others seems to have been lost in the shuffle.A recent study have shown that each and every generation since 1920 said of younger generations that "they were worst then them" in each and every field: writting skills, science, math, ethics, etc. Besides, I personnally consider that bagging the whole "new generations" with such generalization to be a lack of respect in and of itself.I'm only 38, but I wasn't raised to be as disrespectful as much of our younger generation has become. A lot of this can be attributed to the dismantling of "The New Deal" that built our middle class to be strong and prosperous. Families could live very comfortably on one income. Now most every family has to rely on dual incomes and/or multiple jobs to get by. This generation (including me to some extent) was raised by our television networks and video game consoles. Parents need to be afford the time to raise their kids in a proper manner, but that's not as important as rewarding CEOs and other Corp Execs with 7 figure bonuses, massive options, grants, warrants, etc.
Sorry but stuff like that pisses me off! That goddamn "Our generation rules the other sucks!!!" insert puke emoticon. (And don't forget YOU were the ones to raise them like that )
TESTIFY, brother!skyboltone wrote:You thirty-somethings are going to pay the biggest price. You gotta pay down the debt boys. That's all there is to it. It ain't multi national corporations driving the dollar down it's Congress willing to sell it's ass to the highest bidder and that printing press they got in Wash DC. Just like the corporate defined benefit pension plans, (failing by the dozens) the government has been given a by on funding future debt. China will be the worlds leading economy in my lifetime because they are willing to finance that debt while enforcing the "Want Less" principal on their own people.
Amen brother Jones.CaseyJones wrote:
TESTIFY, brother!
The hilarious part of this is we're all righteous by our own standards
I keep wondering about that. Refer to "if we had socialized medicine here".Tubetwang wrote:took early retirement at 50 because diagnosed with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
I guarantee no one is paying my way to the grave. I'm not, the government isn't, the insurance companies aren't. Last time I went to the hospital was because I couldn't stop the bleeding.Tubetwang wrote:Don't get me wrong Casey...
Nobody's is paying my way to the grave...i've got private insurance...Lipitor and Imitrex are'nt cheap in Canada.
I know this one. Back in the day they had the County Farm and Potter's Field. They'd take care of you at the County Farm when you were no longer able to take care of yourself then bury you in a knotty pine box out in Potter's Field.dartanion wrote:ISocial Security is not what most people make it out to be. It's an insurance policy that acts as a safety net for those that no longer bring in an income, not just for retirees. Anyone that has been disabled from a work related accident can be eligible for SS Disability benefits. Let's say you loose a limb at work and can no longer earn a living doing your current job. Or you are brain damaged, or some other horrible thing. Who is going to take care of you? Your employer certainly isn't going to do that, they'd just as soon terminate your employment. You better have your own disability insurance without SS. If we eliminate SS, what are we to do with all the people that will be living on the streets?
If I'm reading you correctly, for the most part you're referring to the "emergency or crisis situations" I cited earlier. I agree with a government "presence" in these situations. The VAST majority of SS is not used for that, nor intended (by the recipients, anyway) for that.dartanion wrote:Social Security is not what most people make it out to be. It's an insurance policy that acts as a safety net for those that no longer bring in an income, not just for retirees. Anyone that has been disabled from a work related accident can be eligible for SS Disability benefits. Let's say you loose a limb at work and can no longer earn a living doing your current job. Or you are brain damaged, or some other horrible thing. Who is going to take care of you? Your employer certainly isn't going to do that, they'd just as soon terminate your employment. You better have your own disability insurance without SS. If we eliminate SS, what are we to do with all the people that will be living on the streets?