marshall ma100h

Marshall Amp Discussion

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
User avatar
JoshBernstein
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:31 am
Location: Key Largo, FL USA

marshall ma100h

Post by JoshBernstein »

So about 5 years ago, i bought a marshall ma100h, before i knew much about tube amps. I saw it for around 700 bucks, thinking it was a great buy. After about 6 months of use, i decided it sounded absolutely deplorable, and it sat in my closet until this morning, when i decided to give it another go. It doesnt sound nearly as terrible as i remember. (At least the clean channel doesn't, the dirty channel still sounds as disgusting as i remember) With a set of fresh tubes and a 12au7 in v1, the clean channel is actually very usable. It is not the best clean sound i have ever heard, and it is not my first choice by far, but i would gig with it. Anyone else have any experience with the ma series?
Not really
User avatar
JoshBernstein
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:31 am
Location: Key Largo, FL USA

Re: marshall ma100h

Post by JoshBernstein »

Ma100
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Not really
User avatar
RWood
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:56 pm

Re: marshall ma100h

Post by RWood »

It saddens me to say so but I haven't heard a decent Marshall production amp in a long, long time. The ones that do sound ok have so many heat/IC/board problems that I would not recommend buying one any more.
The MA is too fizzy for my tastes. There is a good reason they are $700.00 new! Asian crap as far as I'm concerned.
If it were mine...I'd gut it and build a hand wired 2204 or 1987 in that chassis.
If it don't get hot and glow, I don't want it !
Stevem
Posts: 4576
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.

Gggg

Post by Stevem »

Here is a basic rule of thumb for good clean tones be it a tube amp , or a SS type.
The less number of times that your guitars signal passes thru a coupling / tone cap the less phase changes will take place and the more natural the guitar will sound, two to three gain stages max which would include the PI section in PP type amps.

Some of the best clean tones I have ever heard to date are from old tube amps or Mic pre's that use interstage transformers!!!
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!😊

Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
wahmi
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 7:22 am

Re: marshall ma100h

Post by wahmi »

A good friend of mine got ripped off by a store which sold him this amp € 1800 with a 1960a in 2009.

Today he cannot resell it for a change. I told him I was going to try to make the best of it.

Do you know any cool mods that would make it usable?

I join the schematic
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
JimSoprano
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:46 am

Re: marshall ma100h

Post by JimSoprano »

Rip out everything and make him a 1987/2204 thing. Only use transformers if the PT has enough power.
User avatar
bepone
Posts: 1583
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: croatia
Contact:

Re: marshall ma100h

Post by bepone »

+1 for remove all and redo anything, with those transformer and chassis , JTM, JMP.. it is a fun to do specially when you hear for the first time some good tomes from cheap amp!
teemuk
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:01 pm

Re: marshall ma100h

Post by teemuk »

wahmi wrote: Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:29 amDo you know any cool mods that would make it usable?
Hmmm... I see a very Fender-ish clean channel and an OD channel with a lot of influence from the revered 2203 with input boosted. Quite a lot of low cut there, but there usually is in "higher gain" amps...

I know, I know, these MA-series amps do get a lot of flak but what is it particularly - in your opinion and based on your preferences - that makes this amp non-usable? What is it that you don't like about it?

Without knowing that it's quite difficult to suggest how to mod it. More gain? Less gain? More bass? Less? Should there be other character different from that of Marshall amps. Should you build a new amp entirely? Etc.
teemuk
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:01 pm

Re: Gggg

Post by teemuk »

Stevem wrote: Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:31 amThe less number of times that your guitars signal passes thru a coupling / tone cap the less phase changes will take place and the more natural the guitar will sound, two to three gain stages max which would include the PI section in PP type amps.
People seem to have no issues with Soldanos, 5150's, Rectifiers, Marks, Bogners and dozens of other amps that break this golden rule of yours. What If the point is that one doesn't want the guitar to sound "natural" but instead prefers to mangle its tone with distortion, compression of the envelope, emphasis of select frequencies and etc...
Some of the best clean tones I have ever heard to date are from old tube amps or Mic pre's that use interstage transformers!!!
As if those wouldn't introduce phase changes. Sigh.
wahmi
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 7:22 am

Re: marshall ma100h

Post by wahmi »

teemuk wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 9:24 am
wahmi wrote: Fri Oct 01, 2021 9:29 amDo you know any cool mods that would make it usable?
Hmmm... I see a very Fender-ish clean channel and an OD channel with a lot of influence from the revered 2203 with input boosted. Quite a lot of low cut there, but there usually is in "higher gain" amps...

I know, I know, these MA-series amps do get a lot of flak but what is it particularly - in your opinion and based on your preferences - that makes this amp non-usable? What is it that you don't like about it?

Without knowing that it's quite difficult to suggest how to mod it. More gain? Less gain? More bass? Less? Should there be other character different from that of Marshall amps. Should you build a new amp entirely? Etc.
We finaly test it in good condition, and i think we will let it stock for now. You're right, very "2203 type amp" when you take time to do decent preset.
Post Reply