New build 1969 Super Lead
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:11 am
- Location: Leesburg Georgia
- Contact:
3 others liked this
New build 1969 Super Lead
Here’s the amp. This is the one I was asking about the heavy filtering. I’m amazed at how it sounds. Finished it tonight, started it yesterday, wow! It has the 470uF pair in series. Not stiff though. 465 volts on the plates at idle. I was afraid it would have 490 and I’m glad it’s lower. Testing tomorrow. Wendy is ready to see me tonight. Here’s some pictures.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4222
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:11 am
- Location: Leesburg Georgia
- Contact:
Re: New build 1969 Super Lead
Got it mounted up in the cab today.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: New build 1969 Super Lead
Would love to hear it.....clips please!
http://headfirstamplification.com
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:11 am
- Location: Leesburg Georgia
- Contact:
Re: New build 1969 Super Lead
I don't know if this will work.
https://soundcloud.com/vogel-instrument ... t-les-paul
https://soundcloud.com/vogel-instrument ... t-les-paul
Re: New build 1969 Super Lead
Super sweet build. I swore off 100W Plexis but you sir are not helping my willpower. How do you find the attack and clarity with the stiffer filtering? Is there still chewiness? What choke did you use? Looks like a 3H 100R or so.
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:11 am
- Location: Leesburg Georgia
- Contact:
Re: New build 1969 Super Lead
It's a Heyboer C1999 copy, 3H 100R. The amp isn't stiff at all, I have a Metroamp JTM50 with Marstran transformers and it's stiffer than this 1oo watt. The power supply on the 100 sags down about 65 volts from idle to full power, even with the 235uF filters. The 50 watt only drops about 35 volts. I love them both and they are different animals indeed. I expected them to behave opposite.
Re: New build 1969 Super Lead
the 100w amps often sag from ca 480v to 380v. The important thing is that they should sag below 425v or so, given a 1.75k reflected primary impedance and el34s
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:11 am
- Location: Leesburg Georgia
- Contact:
1 others liked this
Re: New build 1969 Super Lead
Roe, now that you say it, it went from 470 +\- volts to 395 +\- volts and the screen to something like 365.
Re: New build 1969 Super Lead
Paul,wpaulvogel wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:45 pm Roe, now that you say it, it went from 470 +\- volts to 395 +\- volts and the screen to something like 365.
Is this with the amp plugged into a load and a signal at the input?
Thanks,
Dave
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:11 am
- Location: Leesburg Georgia
- Contact:
Re: New build 1969 Super Lead
Colossal, yes
I had it testing with a 16 ohm dummy load, signal from a generator and watching it on my scope with a meter on pin 3 of the tube socket.
I had it testing with a 16 ohm dummy load, signal from a generator and watching it on my scope with a meter on pin 3 of the tube socket.
Re: New build 1969 Super Lead
Yikes, hope some sort of attenuating probe was being used, as there's massive kVac on the plate of an inductively loaded, overdriven power tube. I found that out the hard way, with the wreck of my first Fluke, 35 years ago, before I got my head around the back emf thing.wpaulvogel wrote: ↑Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:44 pm Colossal, yes
I had it testing with a 16 ohm dummy load, signal from a generator and watching it on my scope with a meter on pin 3 of the tube socket.
Maybe the resistive load prevented the degree of back emf that occurs with a regular inductive speaker load.
Plus just probing a power tube plate, especially pentode like EL34, can send the amp into oscillation; which itself may likely put the aforementioned kVac on to the meter.
Hence I suggest never to probe a power tube plate, without taking some mitigation, eg removing the phase splitter tube.
My band:- http://www.youtube.com/user/RedwingBand
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:11 am
- Location: Leesburg Georgia
- Contact:
Re: New build 1969 Super Lead
I only use a resistive load when doing tests for plate voltage. I’ve never had a problem with it yet. I’m not going to test with a speaker because the impedance is not stable or for better terms, I have no idea what it is at different frequencies.