6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Marshall Amp Discussion

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
alkuz1961
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:32 am
Contact:

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by alkuz1961 »

Did you check the resistors with a multimeter before installing them? If I remember correctly, the five-ring marking is different from the standard four-ring marking.
2020-03-30_19-06-49.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
MHProd
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:47 pm

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by MHProd »

Yes I did. It’s a 22K. I don’t remember what the 5th ring indicate (military??) but I know it doesn’t affect the value.

But, yes I double checked all resistors, caps, pots, continuity everywhere.
User avatar
pompeiisneaks
Site Admin
Posts: 4222
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
Location: Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by pompeiisneaks »

Having those 8.2 and 9.1k resistors just tacked together like that leaves a lot of chance to bad connections. you should always connect them either at a turret/eyelet or at a minimum wind them together tightly to make a solid physical connection before soldering just to keep them in place. Solder tacking like that is very prone to noise/problems.

I'm not seeing anything else screaming out at me. Did you say you've chopsticked around the amp for any specific areas that change the noise?

~Phil
tUber Nerd!
sluckey
Posts: 3079
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:48 pm
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by sluckey »

I don’t remember what the 5th ring indicate (military??)
It's a reliability factor. I don't recall the specifics. I've never seen any color except yellow.
User avatar
pompeiisneaks
Site Admin
Posts: 4222
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
Location: Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by pompeiisneaks »

My understanding (unless this is specific to older resistors) was that 5 band just gives you 3 digits of precision instead of two, and the last two bands still do the same thing, multiplier and tolerance.

So you may have had 2.2M in 4 bands is now 4.28k in 5 right? (or can have at any rate) (random values not meaning colors somehow changed, just showing the 4 vs 5 band stuff)

The gold should be 5%?

Or is this more of 'the older resistors used a different spec' question?
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
MHProd
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:47 pm

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by MHProd »

So I changed the 8k2/9k1 string to a single 10K. Nope...

Yes, chopsticked and also wiggled the preamp tubes while playing. Nothing...

So far I'm 99% sure:
-Not a component value error.
-Not something wired incorrectly.
-Not a continuity issue.
-Not DC leaking coupling cap.
-Not the tubes
-Not an external factor (guitar, speaker, cables).

Voltages seem OK.

The only "clue" i have so far is the presence pot between 8 and full taking away a lot of the noise/decay. I checked the PI/NFB (moved wires around, resoldered everything, changed coupling caps...) but it did not change anything.

The PI filter cap is a 16/16 can wired in parallel. Do you think the cap could be bad?
What i have for filtering is: Can 1: 50 mains/50 screens, Can 2: 16/16=32 PI, 32+32preamp.

The way the notes decay is not unlike when you turn the amp off standby and the note "disintegrates".
MHProd
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:47 pm

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by MHProd »

pompeiisneaks wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:16 pm My understanding (unless this is specific to older resistors) was that 5 band just gives you 3 digits of precision instead of two, and the last two bands still do the same thing, multiplier and tolerance.

So you may have had 2.2M in 4 bands is now 4.28k in 5 right? (or can have at any rate) (random values not meaning colors somehow changed, just showing the 4 vs 5 band stuff)

The gold should be 5%?

Or is this more of 'the older resistors used a different spec' question?
~Phil
I've measured them and they are all the right value. The PI tail measures 22.1K.
User avatar
alkuz1961
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:32 am
Contact:

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by alkuz1961 »

If you look at the modern five-band marking of resistors with an accuracy of 1%, you will notice that the color of the multiplier differs by an order of magnitude, in a different direction. For example, red is 10K, orange is 100K, and so on.
And this shows an online calculator of resistor values
2020-03-30_22-50-12.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by alkuz1961 on Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
alkuz1961
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:32 am
Contact:

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by alkuz1961 »

By the way, here's how it looks and sounds short circuit in the winding of the output transformer

https://youtu.be/H6AtM2wb0iY
MHProd
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:47 pm

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by MHProd »

unfortunately I do not have a scope. Also, the amp doesn't feedback at all.

What would the Presence pot situation indicate?
User avatar
alkuz1961
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:32 am
Contact:

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by alkuz1961 »

MHProd wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:32 pm unfortunately I do not have a scope.
If I need to check the output transformer, I do the following - disconnect all loads from the secondary circuits and applying an AC voltage to the primary winding from the outlet. I am using a multimeter to measure the voltage between the side and the central leads on both halves of the primary windings. The voltages must be exactly the same. And the transformer should not be heated.
Last edited by alkuz1961 on Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Littlewyan
Posts: 1917
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:50 pm
Location: UK

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by Littlewyan »

One test we could do is to check voltages whilst playing. You say there isn't as much volume as there should be, have you tried monitoring the anode current of the 6V6s whilst playing? How are you checking the bias?

Edit: Reading back through, you say it's pretty much the same amount of fuzz between 2 and 6, have you tried the normal channel at low volume? This should be pretty clean. I'm wondering if there's a dodgy cap somewhere causing this.
MHProd
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:47 pm

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by MHProd »

I have a bias probe which gives the plate voltage/current/wattage. As far as I can tell, it behaves fine when I play.

I haven’t made a 6V6 like this before, so I’m not sure how loud the amp should be. It’s certainly loud but I was expecting more but maybe that’s just me so let’s not make a symptom out of that for now.

I tried all 4 inputs and no, the behaviour is the same. Volume on 2, light strum, I still get that screechy noise. On all 4 inputs. All caps measure fine...

Ugh this is frustrating.
User avatar
alkuz1961
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:32 am
Contact:

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by alkuz1961 »

I think you should try to disconnect this wire (white arrow), connect a temporary potentiometer 1 mohm, as a master, and connect to it any other preamp. This allows you to localize the area where the problem occurs.
2020-03-31_23-00-03.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by alkuz1961 on Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
cxx
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:17 am

Re: 6V6 1987 build sounds like a dying fuzz...

Post by cxx »

I had a failing 1987 that sounded like this and got progressively worse. Turned out to be an OT. If you have a spare might want to clip one in to see if it fixes it. I don't know of another way reliably tell if it's bad.
Post Reply