Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
Can somebody please post a link to a verified/functional Rockster scheme ? I think I might try one
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
Hi Doxie: I did a search for "rockster" in the trainwreck section and found RJ's great build from beginning to end, and the schematic is on the third page I think.
Sometimes finding stuff is rewarding in itself, and also you stumble onto other subjects which is also fun..
Happy hunting... peace
Sometimes finding stuff is rewarding in itself, and also you stumble onto other subjects which is also fun..
Happy hunting... peace
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
Yes....I just prefer to build and study verified and proven schematics...not ones that have UNVERIFIED stamped across it in big bold letters.....I'm weird like that...lol
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
I'll look around a bit
Last edited by Doxie man on Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:15 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
A lot of us here have built the Rockster & Rockster Addus Reverbus with great results.
Just sayin.
Just sayin.
Why Aye Man
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
Well if you don't like unverified then contact the man that provided the layout and schematic for the Rockster KT66 www.rjguitars.net and get verified data.
Not very hard to follow a color layout, try building just using a schematic and basic concept of what the components are doing.
Mark
Not very hard to follow a color layout, try building just using a schematic and basic concept of what the components are doing.
Mark
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
I build from SCHEMATICS....NOT layouts. Building strictly from layouts is not the way to do these things as I am sure your aware. I was just simply asking if there was a verified schematic available on this site that someone could point out....if no is the answer then that was all that was needed to be said for an answer. When I see in large BOLD LETTERS " UNVERIFIED SCHEMATIC" that tells me whoever posted it has no idea if it is accurate which therefor is useless to follow as drawn. I will look it over and verify it myself.
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
A simple no is all you ask, please
I will answer in whatever manner I please, it will be up to the moderator to filter it out.
I will answer in whatever manner I please, it will be up to the moderator to filter it out.
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
No need to get your panties in a knot . I was NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE. Trust me....you would know it when I get rude. Anyway.....let's back up a bit ....take a breath and be friends Mother always said , " your about as smooth as ground glass !"......just like your father . I guess at times.....I can be a bit abrasive. Oh well.......could be worse I guess.......could have been born a tree-hugging liberal
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
Ok sweetheart .....another remark like that and I'm going caps -lock rogue with fat mamma jokes.....you've been warned
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4222
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
Guys... let's watch it, I don't think this is appropriate. If you haven't got something nice to say, don't say anything at all.
~Phil
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
Oh I know. I see where she retracted her vulgar outburst. It's all good. I kinda' like this site pretty good....lots of good reading on circuits that are new to me.
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
How do you know telentubes is a she?
The moderators have asked to be civil.... so should you, and dissing guys that have contributed a lot here over the years shouldn't happen
I see Mark responded to your question about zwreck vs rocket, that's how we work here, we take the high road.
This link shows some differences between the 2 amps
http://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... sc&start=0
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4222
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Rockster KT66 schem/layout ?
Doxie man, you're new here like me, so I'd suggest trying not to push it much more, you've now got 3 different old hat's here not impressed (per what I've read in this thread) and I don't see your tone changing. Per what joeboo88 said, stop trying to enflame the discussion and stick to the topic at hand please.
At this point that's the last time I'm asking nicely.
~Phil
At this point that's the last time I'm asking nicely.
~Phil
tUber Nerd!