where did I find this?

[beezerboy]

like it says... were? I copied it to my computer some time ago but there is no information with it... lost in a computer change I guess. it looks like a really interesting amp & I'm thinkin a 6v6 would be a good next project

[beezerboy]

so anyway.... good bad indifferent? changes you would make. suggestions on things like... transformers. anything else?

[10thTx]

That looks like one of the ExpressSCH editable schematics I drew up some years ago. However, I don't know if that is an actual one I drew or if someone edited one I drew and made that? I have not built that amp, but I think it would be a good design. I have used "one tube reverbs" on a number of amps with success.

I think if you're using 6V6's, I'd consider a PT that is 300-0-300 with 140ma or more. On my Tweed BluezMeister and my Carolina Overdrive Special, I use a Hammond 272FX which is a stand up PT which gave me plenty of room in the chassis. And both builds are cathode biased, so I can simply change between 6V6 and 5881 tubes without re-biasing. I found if I used a 100uf cathode cap on power tubes, that it somewhat emulates a fixed biased tone.

https://www.tubesandmore.com/products/t ... 0-v-172-ma

Then you could use a GZ34 for 300 x 1.3 = 390v on the plates. OR a solid state plug in rectifier for 300 x 1.4 = 420v on plates.

With respect, 10thtx

[10thTx]

OK, I did find my old copy of that SCH drawing. I would consider these changes IF I were building it. The changes are based on what I learned in my two builds mentioned in the previous post.

I've attached the editable version for you.

With respect, 10thtx

[10thTx]

Or you could use an active FX instead of reverb and then use delay or reverb in the FX. The PT and B+ rail are on the 2nd page of the SCH attachment.

With respect, 10thtx

[beezerboy]

very nice.... thank you

[jam-mill]

Look here: http://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=28914