Marshall 2205 failure question

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
stephenl
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:21 pm
Location: Clinton, MA

Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by stephenl »

I repaired/updated a 2205 a couple of months ago, discussed in a previous thread - and it failed again...

After talking with the owner, I found out that he had (2) 8 ohm cabs plugged in (parallel) and set the impedence selector for 16 ohms...

While not as destructive as an open output circuit, a 4x mismatch is pretty hard on the amp - but would it cause failure? It failed pretty quickly.

He said that he had the volume knobs @ 8 for reference. At that volume combined with the low output impedence - I assume that the amp was running at the current limit of the powersupply.

He said it sounded great at first, then got thinner, quieter, gone...
Steve
Stevem
Posts: 4602
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by Stevem »

Please tell us what failed again, as I left my crystal ball home today, lol!

Too low of a load on the OT can burn it up if played loud enough for certain, and it will also chew thru output tubes pretty fast, but not make them short out all on there own if one did fail on you in that way.

As the output tubes get weaker the OT has less current passing thru it and so is less likely to burn up if it has not already!

Has your amp blown the HT fuse?
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!😊

Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Roe
Posts: 1652
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by Roe »

check fuses, output tubes, and both transformers
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
User avatar
xtian
Posts: 7022
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:15 pm
Location: NorCal
Contact:

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by xtian »

Also check screen and grid resistors.
I build and repair tube amps. http://amps.monkeymatic.com
stephenl
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:21 pm
Location: Clinton, MA

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by stephenl »

Socket.jpg
When he originally brought the amp to me it had evidence of power tube socket arcing. The impedence selector was set @ 16 ohms - at the time I didn't know he was running (2) 8 ohms cabs in parallel...

I put in new sockets, cap cans, bias cap, and new KT77's (burned in by Tube Depot) and all new preamp tubes. I set the bias @ 35mA, played it at fairly high volume for over an hour, and left it powered on for a couple of hours, rechecked bias, played a little more - all good.

He killed it in less than an hour.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Steve
stephenl
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:21 pm
Location: Clinton, MA

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by stephenl »

xtian wrote: Wed Sep 29, 2021 3:43 pm Also check screen and grid resistors.
I did check both the screen and grid resistors, when I had it, and all were good.
Steve
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 13327
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by martin manning »

Running at 1/4 the nominal load would result in excessive current draw, leading to red plating and cooking the OT primary. Was this the configuration (selector set to 16Ω, actual load 4Ω) that caused it to land on your bench originally? In other words, Oops I Did It Again?
pdf64
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by pdf64 »

I suspect an intermittent connection in the load, eg bad speaker lead, impedance selector.
stephenl
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:21 pm
Location: Clinton, MA

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by stephenl »

martin manning wrote: Wed Sep 29, 2021 6:54 pm Running at 1/4 the nominal load would result in excessive current draw, leading to red plating and cooking the OT primary. Was this the configuration (selector set to 16Ω, actual load 4Ω) that caused it to land on your bench originally? In other words, Oops I Did It Again?
I suspect that this was the original cause of failure - it did come to me with the selector set to 16Ω and I assume was connected to the same speaker setup.
Steve
Stevem
Posts: 4602
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by Stevem »

A intermittent load on the OT will not make the outputs red plate and burn themselves up though!
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!😊

Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
pdf64
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by pdf64 »

Stevem wrote: Wed Sep 29, 2021 8:43 pm A intermittent load on the OT will not make the outputs red plate and burn themselves up though!
So far, redplating is just supposition, it hasn’t been observed.
And we don’t truly know what load impedance has been used with it.
Whereas tracking has occurred, and an intermittent open circuit on the secondary is likely to cause that.
stephenl
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:21 pm
Location: Clinton, MA

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by stephenl »

So far, redplating is just supposition, it hasn’t been observed.
And we don’t truly know what load impedance has been used with it.
Whereas tracking has occurred, and an intermittent open circuit on the secondary is likely to cause that.
Just to clarify:
The first failure mode is speculative, but likely. It did come to me with the selector on 16Ω.
Relative to the 2nd failure, it is factual that the impedence selector was set to 16Ω with a 4Ω speaker load connected.
Steve
User avatar
bepone
Posts: 1618
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: Croatia
Contact:

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by bepone »

stephenl wrote: Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:45 am While not as destructive as an open output circuit, a 4x mismatch is pretty hard on the amp - but would it cause failure? It failed pretty quickly.
He said it sounded great at first, then got thinner, quieter, gone...
when off and caps discharged, repair again, remeasure all, primaries of power transformers resistance, continuity primar - secondaries ..plus charge more ofcourse this is the fastest school to your friend to start to pay attention :mrgreen: :lol:
User avatar
johnnyreece
Posts: 987
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:05 am
Location: New Castle, IN

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by johnnyreece »

Do you have a way to test the tubes? If they've been run ragged enough to redplate, surely that would show on a tester. Not saying that's the problem, but trying to sort out what's going on when there's another unknown variable complicates things.
pdf64
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK

Re: Marshall 2205 failure question

Post by pdf64 »

stephenl wrote: Thu Sep 30, 2021 11:40 am
Relative to the 2nd failure, it is factual that the impedence selector was set to 16Ω with a 4Ω speaker load connected.
If you’re sure of that then fine, I was thinking the load info may have been from a non trustworthy source, eg a lot of players tend to be a bit flaky regarding that type of detail.
johnnyreece wrote: Fri Oct 01, 2021 2:17 pm Do you have a way to test the tubes? …
Plugging them into a good amp seems a suitable test.
If there’s appropriate voltage on the relevant electrodes yet no anode current flows, then the valve is dead.
Post Reply