
Search found 88 matches
- Wed Dec 01, 2021 7:30 pm
- Forum: Marshall Discussion
- Topic: Dirty Shirley Build
- Replies: 21
- Views: 19288
Re: Dirty Shirley Build
Yeah thats what i was wondering. Also, i’m not sure how he is visualizing the orientation of the socket in the layout. Looking from outside the chassis it should be

- Mon Nov 22, 2021 3:38 am
- Forum: Marshall Discussion
- Topic: Dirty Shirley Build
- Replies: 21
- Views: 19288
Re: Dirty Shirley Build
The iec sockets in diylc always mess me up. On your layout are your wires to the iec socket showing the connections of the rear of the socket (inside the amp chassis)?
- Thu Nov 18, 2021 12:43 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4376
Re: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
Ok, that looks a lot better. Thanks very much. With changing speaker impedances and voltages while playing im imagine this line is moving a lot. I know i like my amps tap set at 8ohm into the 8ohm speaker load (3200ohms) better than when i set my amps tap to 4ohm into the same 8ohm speaker load. If ...
- Thu Nov 18, 2021 5:44 am
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4376
Re: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
Ive been playing around a lot with this load line calculator. But im not sure what I should use for a correct reactive load resistance. I select EL34 pp pentode, for V+ ill enter my plate voltage 480. For Iq, ill enter my bias point 32Ma, but for reactive load Im not sure. Do they want the primary i...
- Wed Nov 17, 2021 3:26 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4376
Re: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
I did notice that, im not educated enough to know if there would be a difference with AB.
- Wed Nov 17, 2021 3:08 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4376
Re: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
Very informative, thanks. Ive been listening to some videos of 2nd and 3rd harmonic distortion examples. The 2nd has a very warm sound alone where the 3rd almost adds like a clear presence to it. Maybe ken fischer was trying to find that balance between the two with his different impedances?
- Tue Nov 16, 2021 2:00 am
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4376
Re: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
Yes, thats at idle. I feel a bit better now, thanks.
- Mon Nov 15, 2021 10:18 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
- Replies: 30
- Views: 4376
Re: designed for a 6.6K Ohms impedance source.
When trying to get the right OT for an amp should we take into account “sag”voltage? I read that term now and then, i’m assuming its the b+ voltage at the plates and screens of the power tubes when the amp is being pushed pretty hard? This post got me thinking maybe my amps OT 3.2k primary impedance...
- Thu Oct 21, 2021 3:53 pm
- Forum: Marshall Discussion
- Topic: HRP_50
- Replies: 25
- Views: 6042
Re: HRP_50
Hello, does the fx loop work good when coming from the master volume instead of the treble pot into the fx loop then back out to the master volume pot? Ive always wondered.
- Wed Oct 13, 2021 6:11 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: Wire Preference
- Replies: 24
- Views: 5947
Re: Wire Preference
Does anyone make pretinned ptfe?
- Thu Sep 16, 2021 3:40 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: 2204 build, questions about capacitors and resistors
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1089
Re: 2204 build, questions about capacitors and resistors
I would build it like the schematic first then try ceramics in the silver mica spots later to see if you like them more.
- Wed Sep 15, 2021 4:08 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: 2204 build, questions about capacitors and resistors
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1089
Re: 2204 build, questions about capacitors and resistors
Its all personal preference but i didnt like silver micas in the amp i made, kind of sounded too smooth in a way. I changed them out to ceramic which had a more aggressive top end to my ears. Not that their any better than other caps but i ended up using synergy caps for most coupling and bypass cap...
- Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:56 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: Tight/Normal switch
- Replies: 4
- Views: 975
Re: Tight/Normal switch
The switch worked out great, no popping. Definitely feels different when engaged. Id only use it for the downtuned heavier stuff, as i get older that is more rare.
- Tue Aug 31, 2021 2:29 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: Tight/Normal switch
- Replies: 4
- Views: 975
Re: Tight/Normal switch
Awesome, thanks!
- Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:55 pm
- Forum: Technical Discussion
- Topic: Tight/Normal switch
- Replies: 4
- Views: 975
Tight/Normal switch
Was thinking of a tight switch that could be used for extended range guitars. Its just an additional 50/50 filter cap after the rectifier switched in when the ground is completed by a switch. Would it make a terrible pop if engaged?