Interesting experience with Hiwatt phase inverters

Vox and Hiwatt Discussion

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
cdemike
Posts: 311
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2023 5:27 pm
Location: Alabama

Interesting experience with Hiwatt phase inverters

Post by cdemike »

I built an SAP clone a few months ago, and I grew pretty frustrated with it after the honeymoon phase ended. It felt very stiff, and I couldn't find an appropriate volume setting where single note lines would sustain while the chords weren't too distorted. In other words, either I'd have a semi-clean rhythm sound that I liked but anemic sounding leads, or over-the-top rhythm and leads that sustained. I also found there was an unpleasant quality to the overdrive with a fatiguing fuzzy quality when in the upper ends of overdrive. To me the amp sounded best with the master volume somewhere between 12:00 and 3:00: lower settings with similar overdrive levels sounded gutless, and higher settings worsened the fuzzy quality. So I figured the issue lie downstream from the master volume.

So I decided to see if I could smooth the amp out by changing the phase inverter circuit from the later style where the PI cathode follower passes no signal to the earlier style where it does pass signal. I originally used a PI circuit similar to the "Jimmy Page" model with the 1.8M and 470K resistors and with it drawing power from its own B+ node rather than sharing it with V1. The NFB network was the same as other later style circuits (not sure if the Page schematic has the NFB circuit partly missing or if it's just an oddball). In any event, you could describe it as being the same as the 80s SAP schematic with different power supply values or like the Page schematic with the more common-to-Hiwatt presence control circuit. The amp was built by adapting a Mojotone kit, so I used their supplied schematic for the new version, which is the same as the early 70s linked input version on Mark Huss' site.

I'm pleasantly surprised how much of a difference this made. The amp is much more approachable with more of the compression I was looking for to match leads to rhythm, and the overdrive lost the fuzziness. Wanted to share the experience since I found it surprisingly difficult to find more information about how the different PI circuits affect the sound. One of the only sources I could find describing the comparative impact on sound was from a Jimmy Page clone amp that was documented on the Marshall forum (post #71 on https://www.marshallforum.com/threads/% ... 713/page-4), and interestingly the builder, Shakti, preferred the later style circuit.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
beasleybodyshop
Posts: 1085
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)

Re: Interesting experience with Hiwatt phase inverters

Post by beasleybodyshop »

I built a clone of the Jimmy Page SAP amp a few years ago, and had the same experience you did.

I ended up rebuilding that amp to early 70s spec preamp with the same PI you ended up with and was much happier.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
cdemike
Posts: 311
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2023 5:27 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Interesting experience with Hiwatt phase inverters

Post by cdemike »

That's interesting! I actually haven't played an amp with the regular-spec Hiwatt preamp without the cathode follower first stage. What did you read as the difference? After running LTSpice sims ad nauseum and messing around with boosts into the front end of my amp, I don't think the CF is contributing much if any clipping (maybe and only maybe some light compression, but I'm missing the reference point without knowing how a non-CF preamp feels).

The unused triode at V2 drives me crazy, so I've been considering adding a regular-spec preamp as a mod. Due to the severe output impedance mismatch, I think the best approach would be to add tube with both sides of the the regular-spec preamp and run that into the unused V2 triode. In other words, just use the unused side of V2 as a plate mixer. What was it that led you to prefer the regular-spec preamp?
W5FH
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2022 11:01 pm

Re: Interesting experience with Hiwatt phase inverters

Post by W5FH »

Thought I would pass this along -
I stumbled upon the 3 very informative Hiwatt DR-103 videos by Steve Fryette. They are pretty long but it was worth the time to study them. He tells of his favorite version of the last gain stage and DC coupled bias regulator triode. What is revealing is when he does a frequency response test of a DR-103 both before and after he implements his version of the bias regulator triode. Also the playing samples done both before and after are convincing.
Mr. Fryette implements the bias regulator triode circuit very much like the "Early 70's Linked Input" preamp schematic as shown on the Mark Huss site. Regarding the last gain stage and cathode follower regulator of this preamp schematic only 1 resistor value is different, the 560K from C/F grid to ground is changed to a 680K. Per Mr. Fryette, in regards to C/F circuit, the keys to getting best tone are two things:
1. The audio signal is passed through the bias regulator triode to the 12AT7 phase inverter.
2. The values of the C/F voltage divider resistors are critical as they form a frequency compensation network in combination with the 0.02 coupler/bypassing capacitor. He prefers the 1 Meg/680K divider.
Some other bits of info I picked up from the videos:
1. Mr. Fryette likes the Hiwatt tone stack and never discusses any changes. He held up a hand drawn DR-103 schematic that is his favorite and I noticed his tone stack is the version with 22K resistor between treble and mid pots. I have seen a 220K resistor in that spot on another Hiwatt schematic.
2. He uses no larger than 0.047 cathode bypass capacitors, in combination with 2.2K resistors, in first and third gain stages. Second gain stage is 1K unbypassed.
3. EL-34 biasing is important in that he demands that factory (warm) biasing be used. He removes the voltage doubler mods if present.
4. He adresses the blocking distortion that can occur in DR-103 versions that do not have grid stopper resistors for second gain stage.
Just thought I would pass along what I learned from these videos.
rdavy
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:13 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: Interesting experience with Hiwatt phase inverters

Post by rdavy »

W5FH wrote: Mon Sep 02, 2024 1:30 pm Thought I would pass this along -
I stumbled upon the 3 very informative Hiwatt DR-103 videos by Steve Fryette. They are pretty long but it was worth the time to study them. He tells of his favorite version of the last gain stage and DC coupled bias regulator triode. What is revealing is when he does a frequency response test of a DR-103 both before and after he implements his version of the bias regulator triode. Also the playing samples done both before and after are convincing.
Mr. Fryette implements the bias regulator triode circuit very much like the "Early 70's Linked Input" preamp schematic as shown on the Mark Huss site. Regarding the last gain stage and cathode follower regulator of this preamp schematic only 1 resistor value is different, the 560K from C/F grid to ground is changed to a 680K. Per Mr. Fryette, in regards to C/F circuit, the keys to getting best tone are two things:
1. The audio signal is passed through the bias regulator triode to the 12AT7 phase inverter.
2. The values of the C/F voltage divider resistors are critical as they form a frequency compensation network in combination with the 0.02 coupler/bypassing capacitor. He prefers the 1 Meg/680K divider.
Some other bits of info I picked up from the videos:
1. Mr. Fryette likes the Hiwatt tone stack and never discusses any changes. He held up a hand drawn DR-103 schematic that is his favorite and I noticed his tone stack is the version with 22K resistor between treble and mid pots. I have seen a 220K resistor in that spot on another Hiwatt schematic.
2. He uses no larger than 0.047 cathode bypass capacitors, in combination with 2.2K resistors, in first and third gain stages. Second gain stage is 1K unbypassed.
3. EL-34 biasing is important in that he demands that factory (warm) biasing be used. He removes the voltage doubler mods if present.
4. He adresses the blocking distortion that can occur in DR-103 versions that do not have grid stopper resistors for second gain stage.
Just thought I would pass along what I learned from these videos.
This is fantastic info, thank you!
Post Reply