183 tonestack frequency response simulation data

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
vibratoking
Posts: 2640
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

183 tonestack frequency response simulation data

Post by vibratoking »

Here are some plots that compare the freqency response of the 183 tonestack with different options. In the sims, all of the pots are set to the midpoint of a linear pot. One plot is a comparison of different resistor values, 4.7M, 22M, and 44M and then PAB enabled. Another compares the response with a 4.7M resistor and all the combinations of PAB and midboost. I also included the schematic used for the simulations so that it is clear what has been simulated.

Hopefully, this helps with the understanding of what is happening in different modes and with different value resisitors.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
dogears
Posts: 1902
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:29 pm

Re: 183 tonestack frequency response simulation data

Post by dogears »

183 is just a Skyline stack. So, these illustrations hold true for probabably a quarter of all Dumbles out there! Just saying as I don't want people to think there was anything unique in the 183 stack.

Pot value on a variable resistor is fung shai and not tone.

Good job though!
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: 183 tonestack frequency response simulation data

Post by Structo »

Thanks for doing all that work!

Always nice to see a graphical representation of amps we love.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
Mac Daddy
Posts: 238
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:37 pm

Re: 183 tonestack frequency response simulation data

Post by Mac Daddy »

dogears wrote:183 is just a Skyline stack. So, these illustrations hold true for probabably a quarter of all Dumbles out there! Just saying as I don't want people to think there was anything unique in the 183 stack.

Pot value on a variable resistor is fung shai and not tone.

Good job though!
Come on Scotty , Not all Skyliner's sound alike , Regardless of whats on paper
User avatar
heisthl
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:35 am
Location: Phoenix

Re: 183 tonestack frequency response simulation data

Post by heisthl »

Great job, although in real life I don't hear that degree of increase around 100hz when midboost is turned on (illustrated in your first set of plots), my ears hear the lower range of it kicking in closer to 300hz range. My ears have been known to be completely wrong though...
Former owner of Music Mechanix
www.RedPlateAmps.com
dogears
Posts: 1902
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:29 pm

Re: 183 tonestack frequency response simulation data

Post by dogears »

Talking stack here Duds.... Not the rest of the circuit. Same Skyline stack.
Mac Daddy wrote:
dogears wrote:183 is just a Skyline stack. So, these illustrations hold true for probabably a quarter of all Dumbles out there! Just saying as I don't want people to think there was anything unique in the 183 stack.

Pot value on a variable resistor is fung shai and not tone.

Good job though!
Come on Scotty , Not all Skyliner's sound alike , Regardless of whats on paper
vibratoking
Posts: 2640
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Re: 183 tonestack frequency response simulation data

Post by vibratoking »

Duds or Dudes? :P
Mac Daddy
Posts: 238
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:37 pm

Re: 183 tonestack frequency response simulation data

Post by Mac Daddy »

vibratoking wrote:Duds or Dudes? :P
Bduds to the all knowing :wink:
Post Reply