My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
talbany
Posts: 4679
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:03 am
Location: Dumbleland

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by talbany »

I believe the added low end is mainly due to the Direct coupled cathode follower driver. By eliminating a capacitor feeding the grids,the result is wider bandwidth, deeper bass (Lower lows/higher highs)

Tony
" The psychics on my bench is the same as Dumble'"
rootz
Posts: 721
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:24 pm
Location: Delft, The Netherlands

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by rootz »

beasleybodyshop wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 10:59 pm I suspect a big part of the low end issue people have with this amp is going to be very low amount of NFB - therein lies the rub though, as you change the dynamic character of the amp. JM2C.
I think you are right. The impedance peak around the resonance frequency of the speaker will be pronounced. Less feedback -> more peak. That is also true for the high end. This explains why the 005 is scooped sounding too.

Also do not use a 500k bass pot. I think the photo of an early Amplified Nation SSS005 has the pot values right. They are written on the chassis of that amp.

Other than that, I use this amp with higher settings on the high filter. There are some demo’s of the AN 005 by RJ on YouTube. Look at his settings: high filter on 5, low filter off or on 1.
beasleybodyshop
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by beasleybodyshop »

rootz wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 12:26 pm
beasleybodyshop wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 10:59 pm I suspect a big part of the low end issue people have with this amp is going to be very low amount of NFB - therein lies the rub though, as you change the dynamic character of the amp. JM2C.
I think you are right. The impedance peak around the resonance frequency of the speaker will be pronounced. Less feedback -> more peak. That is also true for the high end. This explains why the 005 is scooped sounding too.

Also do not use a 500k bass pot. I think the photo of an early Amplified Nation SSS005 has the pot values right. They are written on the chassis of that amp.

Other than that, I use this amp with higher settings on the high filter. There are some demo’s of the AN 005 by RJ on YouTube. Look at his settings: high filter on 5, low filter off or on 1.
Are you using a 250KA pot?
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
rootz
Posts: 721
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:24 pm
Location: Delft, The Netherlands

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by rootz »

Yes, I use typical classic tone stack values with 10n mid cap and 150k slope resistor. You can see those pot values in a picture a bit earlier in the thread.

I have this amp with 4x6V6. I corrected the gnfb accordingly and wired the 220k resistor to the 16r tap of the OT. Could have used the 8r with something like a 150k resistor for gnfb too.

Low end is under control now.

I sincerely thank everyone who contributed: without you my 005 would not even exist. Big thanks!
beasleybodyshop
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by beasleybodyshop »

Might be worth consolidating information (voltages, etc) and making a sticky?

Sure, it's not 100% accurate but seems like a growing number of folks are having successful builds. If anything my message inbox is a indicator of this haha!
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
beasleybodyshop
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by beasleybodyshop »

So I got curious and looked at the schematic for the Peavey Roadmaster - the iron of which allegedly went into SSS#5 or is similar. Interestingly enough it uses a 100K GNFB resistor and a post PI driver (albeit a different one):

Also the Peavey VT120 uses a similar setup albeit no CF driver. Just food for thought.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
Roe
Posts: 1658
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by Roe »

It's doubtful that the Peavey 120w transformers were used in 150w SSSs
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
beasleybodyshop
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by beasleybodyshop »

Then it would have to be the Roadmaster iron then - thats the only other thing Peavey made that could produce that kind of power. It does use a post PI driver circuit as well
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
beasleybodyshop
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by beasleybodyshop »

FWIW I can confirm 170-180vDC on the plates of V1. That seems to be correct.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
beasleybodyshop
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by beasleybodyshop »

IMG_20220226_002703130.jpg
IMG_20220226_002724062.jpg
IMG_20220226_002747478.jpg
I've been making progress on this one if anyone was curious.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
Roe
Posts: 1658
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by Roe »

beasleybodyshop wrote: Fri Feb 25, 2022 2:51 pm Then it would have to be the Roadmaster iron then - thats the only other thing Peavey made that could produce that kind of power. It does use a post PI driver circuit as well
It seems that the 150w models used Sunn/dynaco iron instead. Cf. https://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.p ... co#p435423
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 13422
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by martin manning »

beasleybodyshop wrote: Mon Feb 28, 2022 2:07 amI've been making progress on this one if anyone was curious.
It's looking good! I was wondering what happened to this project. You must be getting close to applying power?
beasleybodyshop
Posts: 1069
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by beasleybodyshop »

martin manning wrote: Mon Feb 28, 2022 10:33 am
beasleybodyshop wrote: Mon Feb 28, 2022 2:07 amI've been making progress on this one if anyone was curious.
It's looking good! I was wondering what happened to this project. You must be getting close to applying power?
I am Martin! Thanks for all your help along the way.

Also, I sent you a message on FB messenger. I dunno if you check that anymore.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
rootz
Posts: 721
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:24 pm
Location: Delft, The Netherlands

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by rootz »

The past months I've been working on and off on the 005. Every time I work on the amp, I get a bit closer to what I like to hear from the amp. One thing that puzzled me all this time, was the fact that people reviewing the Hi Plains Drifter state that the filters are pretty subtle. I do recognise that when it comes to the low filter. Subtle steps adding a bit of bass every notch you go higher. The high filter is a very different matter on my amp and does not seem to behave as expected: not subtle and get harsh in the mids/high mids from the 3 step up. Not at all like I hear from Steel String Sultan/SSS/HPD vids. Those amps all seem to behave well even with the high filter on the 4th or 5th notch.

Does anyone recognise that this amp 'need' a different cap selection for the high filter than e.g. SSS002?

The added simulation shows the effect of a more subtle high filter (green) compared to the values I use at present (red): no more enormous presence and high mid boost with lower values.

Even with an aggressive high filter, this amp is still a joy to play on lower filter settings. High end is very clear and present, low end is tight but big. Great amp for fans of big clean sounds if you ask me.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Guy77
Posts: 924
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 2:46 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005

Post by Guy77 »

rootz wrote: Mon Apr 25, 2022 10:09 pm The past months I've been working on and off on the 005. Every time I work on the amp, I get a bit closer to what I like to hear from the amp. One thing that puzzled me all this time, was the fact that people reviewing the Hi Plains Drifter state that the filters are pretty subtle. I do recognise that when it comes to the low filter. Subtle steps adding a bit of bass every notch you go higher. The high filter is a very different matter on my amp and does not seem to behave as expected: not subtle and get harsh in the mids/high mids from the 3 step up. Not at all like I hear from Steel String Sultan/SSS/HPD vids. Those amps all seem to behave well even with the high filter on the 4th or 5th notch.

Does anyone recognise that this amp 'need' a different cap selection for the high filter than e.g. SSS002?

The added simulation shows the effect of a more subtle high filter (green) compared to the values I use at present (red): no more enormous presence and high mid boost with lower values.

Even with an aggressive high filter, this amp is still a joy to play on lower filter settings. High end is very clear and present, low end is tight but big. Great amp for fans of big clean sounds if you ask me.
Hi Rootz. I will be building a similar amp this summer. I will let you know how the Hi Filters sound on my build.
To confirm you would have preferred that each step would have started with a lower value and not went as high as the 4700pf?
So instead of starting at 150pf it would be better to start at a lower value such as 68pf and increase each cap size in smaller increments?

Thanks

Guy
Post Reply