bias-varying tremolo on a stand alone unit ?

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
cbass
Posts: 4401
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 6:17 pm
Location: Between Pomona & Bakersfield

Re: bias-varying tremolo on a stand alone unit ?

Post by cbass »

The version I have of the gretsch has an intensity control.I drawn a schmatic I'll try to find it.But I was thinkin it was implemented pretty much the same way fender did.Except one leg of the pot goes to ground instead of the bias circuit.
User avatar
mat
Posts: 929
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:52 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: bias-varying tremolo on a stand alone unit ?

Post by mat »

Big thanks everyone for the suggestions! I'll get back to the build after solving a noise problem on another build.
mat
User avatar
mat
Posts: 929
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:52 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: bias-varying tremolo on a stand alone unit ?

Post by mat »

Back to the build (standalone loop buffer/tremolo/reverb). I'm little confused how to set the order of the 3 circuits (2 tube reverb, 1 tube tremolo and dumbleator). What I would like to achieve is to have opportunity to bypass every 3 circuits. Should the reverb and tremolo be before or after the active loop ?

Any suggestions for the order ?

Thanks,
mat
tubeswell
Posts: 2337
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Wellington. NZ

Re: bias-varying tremolo on a stand alone unit ?

Post by tubeswell »

Have you got a schematic you're working to so far?
He who dies with the most tubes... wins
User avatar
LeftyStrat
Posts: 3117
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:58 pm
Location: Marietta, SC, but my heart and two of my kids are in Seattle, WA

Re: bias-varying tremolo on a stand alone unit ?

Post by LeftyStrat »

mat wrote:Back to the build (standalone loop buffer/tremolo/reverb). I'm little confused how to set the order of the 3 circuits (2 tube reverb, 1 tube tremolo and dumbleator). What I would like to achieve is to have opportunity to bypass every 3 circuits. Should the reverb and tremolo be before or after the active loop ?

Any suggestions for the order ?

Thanks,
Personal opinion, and I've seen it done differently, but my choice would be tremolo, fx send, reverb. Here's my reasoning:

- Tremolo into delay can get some interesting rhythmic things going.

- Tremolo into later distorting stages can be neat because is more than volume manipulation, because it can modulate between clean and dirty, changing the harmonic content.

- Room acoustics are always the last thing in your signal chain, and reverb is a simulation of room acoustics.

Of course rules are made to be broken. I'm sure some interesting effects can be had by a different order. You could always have separate ins and outs and patch them however you wanted. With normalized jacks, you could have a default order that is broken when the jack is used.
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
User avatar
mat
Posts: 929
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:52 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: bias-varying tremolo on a stand alone unit ?

Post by mat »

tubeswell wrote:Have you got a schematic you're working to so far?
Not yet. Actually I often draw only a layout by hand and build from there.

I was thinking Wallbangers suggestion (http://www.lynx.bc.ca/~jc/supro_s6616.pdf) of the Supro tremolo into dlator into Heistils 2 tube reverb.

Would the Supro trem tube then connect to the first stage of the D-lator ? Then the D-lator should be always on but I don't think that would be a problem.
Last edited by mat on Sun Jul 06, 2014 9:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mat
User avatar
mat
Posts: 929
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:52 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: bias-varying tremolo on a stand alone unit ?

Post by mat »

LeftyStrat wrote:You could always have separate ins and outs and patch them however you wanted. With normalized jacks, you could have a default order that is broken when the jack is used.
Good suggestion 8)
mat
Post Reply