Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

User avatar
schaublin65
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 11:59 am
Location: Ireland

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by schaublin65 »

Hi

I'd like to thank all the kind people for helping me with my question :D

"Not a big deal I just pull the glass off and wipe out the excessive electrons with a clean. Cloth"

I have a Buddy Holly Tshirt and a Led Zepplin Tshirt I can use 8)

I might need more advice... :D

Take care

John
54Goldtop
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:12 am
Location: United States

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by 54Goldtop »

PDF - Are you suggesting that the wattage spread between push-pull and single-ended is not as vast as commonly believed (see below)
Last edited by 54Goldtop on Mon Dec 08, 2014 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
54Goldtop
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:12 am
Location: United States

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by 54Goldtop »

pdf64 wrote:

Yes, you've summed up a conumdrum!

However, from http://www.valvewizard.co.uk/pp.html does it matter, as two methods of estimating output power are put forward, the latter is more of an estimate but doesn't appear to require cut off?
And we know that transformer action should cause each PP plate to swing between 0v and 2VB+ (ignoring losses).

Much abbreviated summary -
Output power:
P = (HT-Vmin) * Ipeak / 2
= 17.9W
Alternatively
P = 2 * (HT-50)^2 / Rload 15.6W


Maybe the second formula is why amps never seem to put out as much power as they should (or is that just me)?
pdf64
Posts: 2886
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by pdf64 »

I'm not querying the power advantage of PP over SE; even if the 'other' side tube doesn't completely cut off, it's still able to cool off for part of the cycle, thereby allowing lower value load impedances to be used than would be the case for class A PP or SE, and so higher power output.
Rather I'm unclear as to how effectively the differing classes of PP get implemented in practice.
https://www.justgiving.com/page/5-in-5-for-charlie This is my step son and his family. He is running 5 marathons in 5 days to support the research into STXBP1, the genetic condition my grandson Charlie has. Please consider supporting him!
User avatar
Tony Bones
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 8:24 pm

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by Tony Bones »

54Goldtop wrote:PDF - Are you suggesting that the wattage spread between push-pull and single-ended is not as vast as commonly believed (see below)
What's commonly believed is what's actually been measured over the past century or so.
54Goldtop
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:12 am
Location: United States

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by 54Goldtop »

My apologies, after closer examination realize I misread the formula's and jumped to conclusions -
User avatar
Leo_Gnardo
Posts: 2585
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 1:33 pm
Location: Dogpatch-on-Hudson

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by Leo_Gnardo »

54Goldtop wrote:PDF - Are you suggesting that the wattage spread between push-pull and single-ended is not as vast as commonly believed
Reality has its way of blunting our expectations. Doesn't it. :shock:
down technical blind alleys . . .
Jana
Posts: 1314
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:40 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by Jana »

Leo Gnardo,
reality--I try to avoid it.
What?
54Goldtop
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:12 am
Location: United States

In Conclusion

Post by 54Goldtop »

With class AB, the zone from plus-ten to minus-ten percent represents the Class A portion where current flows through both tubes. Signals beyond that level will drive each of the tubes alternately into cut-off with the remainder of the signal being amplified by the other tube. Since we’ve reduced the idle current (amps) by biasing the tube away from the class A midpoint, we can now substantially increase the voltage it handles and still keep the dissipation at a level well below what it was for Class A. And as the voltage on the tubes increases, so does the amplitude or amount of clean power they can conduct i.e, greater wattage.
matt h
Posts: 1224
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 2:26 am
Location: New England

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by matt h »

(deleted)
pdf64
Posts: 2886
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK

Re: Push/Pull vs two tubes parallel (Single Ended)

Post by pdf64 »

matt, what's with the mass deletions?
edit - oh dear that's unfortunate.
https://www.justgiving.com/page/5-in-5-for-charlie This is my step son and his family. He is running 5 marathons in 5 days to support the research into STXBP1, the genetic condition my grandson Charlie has. Please consider supporting him!
Post Reply