Davebluefireamps wrote:I agree with all of what you've written but that doesn't mean you can't try to cover that. I did already state that it was empirical and I agree that every designer has his own style just as each guitarist does. Bruce was looking for input. I still feel the areas I mentioned have not been covered well previously, despite the fact they may be more amp or circuit specific. Hey, who wouldn't want to read a book by Dumble or Fischer if that were possible?talbany wrote:This is a VERY subjective topic and very hard to analyze as well as document and display the data.. Most of this is done through empirical testing and trial and error and years of building all kinds of different type amps.. It's also a big part of the art and interpenetration of amp building and many other things..Much of it takes years to obtain and most are very protective of this info..It's like you can follow your grandmothers recipes but it's never quite the same when she makes it in her kitchen..What is lacking is information on how to tweak circuits and how they will then sound.
IMO..after you do it long enough and find your own unique style of building and tweaking amps you can make anything sound good using any number of different parts and combination of parts,and know exactly how it will sound while your building it..Some things you just cannot get out of the books,experience is the only teacher
As far as general amp theory goes my advice there is SO much great info in the RCA Radio Design Handbook (RDH4) written by the founders of tube amps.. It's The Bible!..read it.... Read it again!
Tony
Dave
Maybe you could ask Bruce some straight forward questions perhaps he will be kind enough to answer a couple since he started this discussion give us a preview...I would be interested in hearing his opinion as well!!
Good Luck!
Tony