Stang Ray question
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Stang Ray question
I'm looking at my stang ray shematic and layout, and it seems to me that one of them is wrong. To me it looks like the layout and schematics are drawn differently.
The two 68K resistors aren't connected in the layout, but that's not the problem, it's the way the 1M resistor is wired, and how the two jacks are hooked up, that I can't figure out...
Do you agree?
The two 68K resistors aren't connected in the layout, but that's not the problem, it's the way the 1M resistor is wired, and how the two jacks are hooked up, that I can't figure out...
Do you agree?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Stang Ray question
Example of input jack wiring
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Stang Ray question
Is this the same as the schematic? What about the layout, does that show the same wiring as the schematic?
- martin manning
- Posts: 13435
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: Stang Ray question
10thTx's layout is what you want, and this is a standard Fender input scheme. You can look at any of them from the past 50 years or so and you will see it.Tdale wrote:Is this the same as the schematic? What about the layout, does that show the same wiring as the schematic?
The schematic you posted is in error. The top of the 1Meg should be connected to the left end of the lower 68k (the "dot" that would indicate this connection where the lines cross is missing).
- Darkbluemurder
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:28 pm
Re: Stang Ray question
I built that amp but used a pair of 6V6 tubes instead of the EL84 quad. That amp gave a great clean tone but not much more. It was also lower in volume than any other amp I built so far. The reason is the tone control - took it out and gain and volume were back - at the expense of the very special tone the amp had with it. If you like Brad Paisley's tone then go for it but don't expect a lot of crunch from it.
BTW I rebuilt the amp into something different.
Cheers Stephan
BTW I rebuilt the amp into something different.
Cheers Stephan
Re: Stang Ray question
The schematic and layout in circulation has some inconsistencies in them.Darkbluemurder wrote:I built that amp but used a pair of 6V6 tubes instead of the EL84 quad. That amp gave a great clean tone but not much more. It was also lower in volume than any other amp I built so far. The reason is the tone control - took it out and gain and volume were back - at the expense of the very special tone the amp had with it. If you like Brad Paisley's tone then go for it but don't expect a lot of crunch from it.
BTW I rebuilt the amp into something different.
Cheers Stephan
In Dr. Z's video, the [Stangray] is described by Paisley as a big clean Vox AC30. So yes, it is designed specifically to stay a LOT cleaner and avoid breakup until the very end when it is cranked.
"It's a great clean amp...it's not the type of amp that really gets that dirty...not designed to, it's sort of like a Vox that never really breaks up...So anyway, I've always loved this amp for the cleanness of it, it's like uh...a lot of complaints you get about Voxes, they're a loud amp, but they're not a clean loud...you gotta run'em a third of the volume to stay clean with'em, that's not the case here...trust me as I stand here...(plays riff)...that's very, very loud and it's not breaking up as much as a Vox would."
Brad uses it specifically for its clean sound and relies on the Mazerati GT, Remedy, Prescription ES, and now more recently his new-production ZWrecks to get his lead tones.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 2582
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: central Maine
Re: Stang Ray question
EF86 wants to see a high impedance, the mismatch causes the loss.
A simple tone, a treble bypass and or bleed will fix it. Its pretty much an
AC 15 pre on an AC 30 power side, but made to play clean....
A simple tone, a treble bypass and or bleed will fix it. Its pretty much an
AC 15 pre on an AC 30 power side, but made to play clean....
lazymaryamps
Re: Stang Ray question
I have the S series Stangray and that amp is quiet, lots of clean headroom, dam hard to break up and running through two blues is wonderful amp lots of chime. Recently added gold/blue speaker arrangement which I like as well.
Mark
edited 11/30/2010The layout and schematic are correct.
Mark
Last edited by M Fowler on Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Stang Ray question
Other than the input jack wiring, is the schematic correct ?
Heavens, an unused PI input !
- Darkbluemurder
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:28 pm
Re: Stang Ray question
That matches exactly my observations except for the loudness thing. My amp probably would have been just loud enough to gig with the country rock band I play in but no way that could have been called "very, very loud". The rebuilt amp with a different circuit is much louder even when played clean. I compared the amp to youtube samples of the original and found that I hit the mark with the tone but it was definitely a quiet amp.Colossal wrote: In Dr. Z's video, the [Stangray] is described by Paisley as a big clean Vox AC30. So yes, it is designed specifically to stay a LOT cleaner and avoid breakup until the very end when it is cranked.
"It's a great clean amp...it's not the type of amp that really gets that dirty...not designed too, it's sort of like a Vox that never really breaks up...So anyway, I've always loved this amp for the cleanness of it, it's like uh...a lot of complaints you get about Voxes, they're a loud amp, but they're not a clean loud...you gotta run'em a third of the volume to stay clean with'em, that's not the case here...trust me as I stand here...(plays riff)...that's very, very loud and it's not breaking up as much as a Vox would."
That concept makes sense soundwise - pair a clean amp with a very loud and dark lead amp. But you will definitely have a loudness difference problem with a Stang Ray - Mazerati GT set up. I never got to play a Prescription ES.Colossal wrote: Brad uses it specifically for its clean sound and relies on the Mazerati GT, Remedy, Prescription ES, and now more recently his new-production ZWrecks to get his lead tones.
That is correct but either one should get you in the ballpark of an original.Colossal wrote: The schematic and layout in circulation has some inconsistencies in them.
Cheers Stephan
- Darkbluemurder
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:28 pm
Re: Stang Ray question
Mark,M Fowler wrote:
The layout and schematic are not correct.
Mark
Can you please identify the incorrect parts?
Thanks a lot, Stephan
Stangray
Stephan,
I can, I will PM you.
And who named that schematic Stank-Ray this amp is far from being anything close to stanky.
The Stangray is one of Mike's greatest clean amps. For dirt put a pedal board in front or in the effects loop. Otherwise one may have to go with a RxES, Maz GT or the new Zwreck for dirt. Run a two amp rig. I never use a reverb pedal with this amp when running into two blues or gold/blue it has a natural almost reverb quality.
I can, I will PM you.
And who named that schematic Stank-Ray this amp is far from being anything close to stanky.
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
The Stangray is one of Mike's greatest clean amps. For dirt put a pedal board in front or in the effects loop. Otherwise one may have to go with a RxES, Maz GT or the new Zwreck for dirt. Run a two amp rig. I never use a reverb pedal with this amp when running into two blues or gold/blue it has a natural almost reverb quality.
Re: Stang Ray question
I too would like to know where the Stank went wrong.
Heavens, an unused PI input !
Re: Stang Ray question
Bump?chopstuck wrote:I too would like to know where the Stank went wrong.
Music is an expression of the inexpressable ~ Vernon Reid, Musician.
Re: Stang Ray question
A person named Robin emailed me regarding accuracy of Stangray layout and schematic floating around.
Your email reports back as undeliverable so PM me.
Mark
Your email reports back as undeliverable so PM me.
Mark