Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:29 am
Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
I made Dumble reverb layouted by Normster.
Can you recommand another circuit that has single tube?
I use Hammond 1750A and 8AB3C1B
I am interested in Rockerverb and Mesa Lonestar circuits. Will they work well?
-Rockerverb- -Mesa Lonestar- Please recommend other circuits to apply to my Dumble.
It works fine but the amount of reverb is not enough for me. Can you recommand another circuit that has single tube?
I use Hammond 1750A and 8AB3C1B
I am interested in Rockerverb and Mesa Lonestar circuits. Will they work well?
-Rockerverb- -Mesa Lonestar- Please recommend other circuits to apply to my Dumble.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
You may find some information on this thread that may be of use such as the 6BM8 reverb design?
http://el34world.com/Forum/index.php?topic=7957.0
With respect, 10thtx
http://el34world.com/Forum/index.php?topic=7957.0
With respect, 10thtx
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:29 am
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
Thanks! The circuit you show me is almost the same with my circuit.10thTx wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:56 am You may find some information on this thread that may be of use such as the 6BM8 reverb design?
http://el34world.com/Forum/index.php?topic=7957.0
With respect, 10thtx
Here’s my schematic. What’s the key difference between two?
The cathode resistor value? B+ resistor on reverb transformer? Input capacitor value?
First of all, I want to lower the value of the cathode resistor on reverb send because the DR has 2.2K on Parallel Reverb send.
What is your opinion?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
I had a Morgan SW22R on the bench a while back and reverse engineered out a schematic and took some gutshot pics.
Big-sounding amp (for a p-p 6V6). Try a 12AT7 in the LTP slot for extra razzle-dazzle. The reverb is nice sounding for a 1-tube 12AX7 jobbie. For more 'splash', I'd be inclined to try a 12DW7 tube with the 'AU' triode as the driver, but subbing in a beefier cathode resistor at say 4k7 to 5k6
Big-sounding amp (for a p-p 6V6). Try a 12AT7 in the LTP slot for extra razzle-dazzle. The reverb is nice sounding for a 1-tube 12AX7 jobbie. For more 'splash', I'd be inclined to try a 12DW7 tube with the 'AU' triode as the driver, but subbing in a beefier cathode resistor at say 4k7 to 5k6
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
He who dies with the most tubes... wins
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:29 am
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
Thanks for your good recommendation!tubeswell wrote: ↑Tue Jun 26, 2018 8:59 am I had a Morgan SW22R on the bench a while back and reverse engineered out a schematic and took some gutshot pics.
Big-sounding amp (for a p-p 6V6). Try a 12AT7 in the LTP slot for extra razzle-dazzle. The reverb is nice sounding for a 1-tube 12AX7 jobbie. For more 'splash', I'd be inclined to try a 12DW7 tube with the 'AU' triode as the driver, but subbing in a beefier cathode resistor at say 4k7 to 5k6
This amp looks like a Dumble ODS with no OD stage. (with reverb)
It also very close with my amp's reverb circuit.
B+ resistor of reverb transformer and cathode resistor value of the reverb send stage seems the key.
I decided to change them. Thanks again!
I have one question about the circuit.
Except for the Blackface reverb circuit, most of the tube-driven reverb circuits have a "mix" type reverb knob.
It receives the signal with potentiometer 2 pin, outputs it to pin 3, and sends pin 1 to ground.
But this circuit has "volume" type reverb knob as it is used in the Blackface.
It receives a signal with pin 3, sends it to pin 2, and sends pin 1 to the ground.
What is the difference between these two types of reverb knobs? Is there a difference in the amount of reverberation?
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
My Magnatone Panoramic has the typical Fender BF / SF reverb circuit but uses one preamp tube for the reverb drive & recovery instead of two. The other difference is they flip the 220k / 470k reverb mix circuit. I.E. the 470k is grounded and the 220k connects the reverb control with the grid of the dry/wet mix....
They use a 12AX7 but I like a 12AT7, it's a bit smoother sounding to my ears...
TT
They use a 12AX7 but I like a 12AT7, it's a bit smoother sounding to my ears...
TT
- turbo5speed
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 8:30 pm
- Location: Porto, Portugal
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
I've been searching for a really long time but no one seems to say either the reference of the reverb tank or the transformer in this schematic. As you know, reverb tanks have different specs and there are lots of different ones. I know that the transformer is some fender type but what is the specific reference? Anyone want to shed some light on this subject? Thank you!
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4239
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
Yes, you pick the transformer for the reverb pan. Basically the transformer is designed for an output of a 12A*7 type tube, maybe in the 10k ish range, and outputs either 4 or 8 ohms or whatnot. Then you couple that with a tank of the same ohms and you're in business. Most common fender amp reverb transformers and pans work perfectly here because they're set to work together, so long as you use the same part numbers from the same amp.
Example, the typical one I've used has part number: 022921 which is a 14.5k input and 4 ohm output, Pair that with a 2 spring reverb like: 4AB3C1B and you have a perfect pair.
~Phil
Example, the typical one I've used has part number: 022921 which is a 14.5k input and 4 ohm output, Pair that with a 2 spring reverb like: 4AB3C1B and you have a perfect pair.
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
- turbo5speed
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 8:30 pm
- Location: Porto, Portugal
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
Thank you very much Phil, this will help me a lot!pompeiisneaks wrote: ↑Tue Jul 17, 2018 6:39 pm Yes, you pick the transformer for the reverb pan. Basically the transformer is designed for an output of a 12A*7 type tube, maybe in the 10k ish range, and outputs either 4 or 8 ohms or whatnot. Then you couple that with a tank of the same ohms and you're in business. Most common fender amp reverb transformers and pans work perfectly here because they're set to work together, so long as you use the same part numbers from the same amp.
Example, the typical one I've used has part number: 022921 which is a 14.5k input and 4 ohm output, Pair that with a 2 spring reverb like: 4AB3C1B and you have a perfect pair.
~Phil
Cheers.
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
Depends on the driver tube and how much current to need to drive the pan's input transducer. A tube-and-transformer driver will generally deliver higher current than a purely tube-driven pan (but you can do the latter, and a number of guys around here have over the years).turbo5speed wrote: ↑Tue Jul 17, 2018 6:31 pm I've been searching for a really long time but no one seems to say either the reference of the reverb tank or the transformer in this schematic. As you know, reverb tanks have different specs and there are lots of different ones. I know that the transformer is some fender type but what is the specific reference? Anyone want to shed some light on this subject? Thank you!
In terms of a transformer option, you want a tranny that reflects a load back to the tube that the tube is comfortable 'seeing' under normal conditions (so that it runs within normal operating parameters). An equivalent load to a resistive load is a useful staring point. For a 12AX7 triode, this can be anywhere between 47k and 220k, with 100k being the norm. Because a transformer isn't a resistive load, you need to bias the tube so that it doesn't run over it's spec'd Pmax. The problem with using a 12AX7 as a driver is that these have a highish internal plate resistance, so won't be able to suck much current through this tube under normal operating parameters. You will get some reverb, but it won't be as luscious as other types of tubes could provide. All this goes to say, that its best to pick a driver tube that has a lower plate resistance and can push more current, like an out tetrode, pentode or if a preamp tube, a 12AT7 or 12AU7. (Fender uses AT7 drivers in its classic reverb amp circuits. 12AU7 is a commonly used output tube in little 1W amps). If you want a 1-tube reverb, you could use a 12DW7, which has an AU7 triode in one half (which could be the driver) and an AX7 triode in the other half (for the recovery stage).
If using the AU7 as a driver with a 400V supply, it will happily tolerate any reflected load between about 15k (which would deliver heaps of current) to 47k (low current). Most Fender reverb driver transformers are wound to reflect around 18k to 25k with an 8R pan input transducer, so these are good to use with a single 12AU7 driver stage. You want to bias a 12AU7 driver between about -8V to -10V to be sort of in the middle of the load line. Start out with 1k8 to 2k2 cathode resistance and see where that lands with plate idle voltage and cathode current. In a 12DW7 envelope, a AU7 triode Pmax is 3.3W.
He who dies with the most tubes... wins
-
- Posts: 4984
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
- Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
I can look thru my old info if you like as I recall I had a circuit that uses a triple triode / compaction 12 pin type.
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!
Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!
Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
- turbo5speed
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 8:30 pm
- Location: Porto, Portugal
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
Most Fender reverb driver transformers are wound to reflect around 18k to 25k
According to the ECL86 datasheet, the anode load resistor of the pentode stage, in class A, should be arround 7k to 10k. I've got 2 NOS Philips ECL86 lying around that should not be used with this transformer correct?
I have seen reverb schematics with this tube but never quite liked them for some strange reason

- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4239
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
The tube will match the reflected load of the transformer, but it may not operate well in that range, and may have a severely shorter lifespan. You'd need to see if there's data in the datasheet about ranges allowed etc. Otherwise, no it's better to find a transformer that goes from the 7-10k range in and outputs either the 4 or 8 ohm range that the more common reverb pans come in.turbo5speed wrote: ↑Sun Jul 22, 2018 2:53 pmMost Fender reverb driver transformers are wound to reflect around 18k to 25k
According to the ECL86 datasheet, the anode load resistor of the pentode stage, in class A, should be arround 7k to 10k. I've got 2 NOS Philips ECL86 lying around that should not be used with this transformer correct?
I have seen reverb schematics with this tube but never quite liked them for some strange reason![]()
I'm not 100% sure this is the 'right' one, but this hammond seems to fit the bill for that tube with 8 ohm primary with 8k secondary, so you'd need to ensure it has the current capacity as well, etc:
https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Ha ... zpGznKU%3d
again, if you really wanted to use that specific tube. 12A*7s are so easy and cheap, they're common. seems someone earlier was talking about which work best and why, I can't remember exactly, I'll probably scroll back and re-read it again myself to make sure I remember it

~Phil
tUber Nerd!
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
A reverb tranny out of a Fender (stand alone) reverb tank should be close enough to okay for an ECL86 driver.turbo5speed wrote: ↑Sun Jul 22, 2018 2:53 pmMost Fender reverb driver transformers are wound to reflect around 18k to 25k
According to the ECL86 datasheet, the anode load resistor of the pentode stage, in class A, should be arround 7k to 10k. I've got 2 NOS Philips ECL86 lying around that should not be used with this transformer correct?
He who dies with the most tubes... wins
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4239
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Please recommend single tube reverb circuit.
So then even though the ecl86 wants 7 to 10k and the usual fenders are 15 to 20k, that shouldn't be enough of an impedance mismatch to push the ECL86 too much? How do you know what that threshold is?tubeswell wrote: ↑Mon Jul 23, 2018 2:59 amA reverb tranny out of a Fender (stand alone) reverb tank should be close enough to okay for an ECL86 driver.turbo5speed wrote: ↑Sun Jul 22, 2018 2:53 pmMost Fender reverb driver transformers are wound to reflect around 18k to 25k
According to the ECL86 datasheet, the anode load resistor of the pentode stage, in class A, should be arround 7k to 10k. I've got 2 NOS Philips ECL86 lying around that should not be used with this transformer correct?
tUber Nerd!