john mayer's two rock??

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

two tone
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:54 pm

Re: john mayer's two rock??

Post by two tone »

Thanx a lot Larry,
did you also measure the primary impedance of the OT?
User avatar
novosibir
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
Contact:

Re: john mayer's two rock??

Post by novosibir »

two tone wrote:did you also measure the primary impedance of the OT?
No, but I've measured the primary's resistance, which was:
red (CT) - brown = 45 ohms
red (CT) - blue = 50 ohms

The primary's inductivity was 7.0H, measured w/o load at the secondary and a meter's range of 120Hz

The dimensions of the lamination stack were: 95 x 78mm, 34mm thick

And there were some numbers on a sticker on the end bells:
OT - 4 - 8 - 16
40 - 16849
166 - 0309

The dimensions of the PT's lamination stack were: 104 x 87mm, 54mm thick (high, Z-mount)

On the sticker on the end bell was written:
50W MULTITAP
40 - 16876
166 - 0307

The choke I haven't measured, but it was TwinReverb/Showman size.

HTH

Larry
Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery
User avatar
FUCHSAUDIO
Posts: 1256
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: New Jersey (you got a problem with that ?)
Contact:

Questions

Post by FUCHSAUDIO »

So the transformers are Marvel Magnetics, same supplier to Mesa.

Interesting how they claim "they don't clone" and "don't goop", and do both :).

Boy they love weird "loops", or lack of them.
Proud holder of US Patent # 7336165.
User avatar
jelle
Posts: 2391
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: john mayer's two rock??

Post by jelle »

FUCHSAUDIO wrote:
'Boy they love weird "loops", or lack of them.'

What do you mean by that? Do you mean local NFB loops which I can see in the schem?

Jelle
User avatar
FUCHSAUDIO
Posts: 1256
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: New Jersey (you got a problem with that ?)
Contact:

Re: john mayer's two rock??

Post by FUCHSAUDIO »

jelle wrote:FUCHSAUDIO wrote:
'Boy they love weird "loops", or lack of them.'

What do you mean by that? Do you mean local NFB loops which I can see in the schem?

Jelle
Not exactly. The NFB loops are clearly D*mble inspired, but what I meant was the effects loop isn't really a loop. It has a send (off the master wiper) and a return amp. No cathode follower to match impedance and so forth. It's not really a loop (as we know it). I've heard rumors that Bill Krinnard "doesn't like cathode followers". Trying to drive a solid state effect without a low input impedance would be clearly a recipe for a sucky tone IMHO.
Last edited by FUCHSAUDIO on Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Proud holder of US Patent # 7336165.
User avatar
jelle
Posts: 2391
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: john mayer's two rock??

Post by jelle »

I see your point and this surprised me too. With the CF send it would have demanded another tube...or they'd have to rewire the reverb return stage to use only one triode. The CF makes even the most picky effects units works like a charm. :D

'Trying to drive a solid state effect with a low input impedance would be clearly a recipe for a sucky tone IMHO.'

I thought the CF has a low impedance output which matches the low impedance input of the solid state effects... :roll:

OTOH I can see why some people actually like this tone bleed at the end of the signal line...
Jelle
User avatar
FUCHSAUDIO
Posts: 1256
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: New Jersey (you got a problem with that ?)
Contact:

Post corrected

Post by FUCHSAUDIO »

I meant to say "without" a low impedance/cathode follower....lol.
Proud holder of US Patent # 7336165.
User avatar
jelle
Posts: 2391
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: john mayer's two rock??

Post by jelle »

:D LOL!

Thanks!
User avatar
novosibir
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
Contact:

Re: john mayer's two rock??

Post by novosibir »

One half of a 12AT7 as the reverb driver and the other half as the cathode follower to the Send would have been a better solution IMO, as it is now. Shure not the 'perfect' solution, but a solution w/o an additional tube.

But sometimes designer can't see the forest, because there are so much trees everywhere :wink:

Larry
Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery
User avatar
jelle
Posts: 2391
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: john mayer's two rock??

Post by jelle »

Larry,
Nice to have you here on this forum. I have enjoyed your posts on the marshall oriented forums and the Ampage a lot! Thanks for the schem BTW. 8)

On the topic of the send CF...It sure leaves the designer room to come up with an updated model again ...but then again I know I keep on learning stuff and use the stuff I learned to improve my amps. :idea:

Jelle
Joe Mlog
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:55 am

Re: Questions

Post by Joe Mlog »

FUCHSAUDIO wrote:So the transformers are Marvel Magnetics, same supplier to Mesa.

Interesting how they claim "they don't clone" and "don't goop", and do both :).

Boy they love weird "loops", or lack of them.
one minute you're nice, the next minute takin' a shot. Just because we use a given manufacturer, doesn't mean we copied their transformer.
really, Andy, I'm surprised ar you.
Joe Mlog
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:55 am

Re: john mayer's two rock??

Post by Joe Mlog »

B Vance wrote:
swt wrote:it's definitely dumble sounding...the cleans are great!! Smooth od...will aslo like to know about speakers...
I have not had the chance to play the JM Sig, but I was under the impression that it was simply a clean 100 watt amp. Everything I've seen has mentioned the fact that he uses other means to generate his OD.

He was using a string of different pedals for a while but when I saw him at the Crossroads Guitar Festival he was using a Dumble overdrive solid state preamp of some sort.

About a year ago, Tomo was trying to get John on with Eminence Speakers, but JM was insistent on his Jensens. As far as I know he's still using them unless Two Rock came up with a JM signature speaker.

John's using our 12-65 speaker in his rigs now.
User avatar
Funkalicousgroove
Posts: 2235
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:04 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Contact:

Re: john mayer's two rock??

Post by Funkalicousgroove »

OK Joe, Since you're here, How the hell do the Hi/Lo filters on the SSS work?

You know you know,and we know that you know, so whaddaya think about sharing?
Owner/Solder Jockey Bludotone Amp Works
User avatar
FUCHSAUDIO
Posts: 1256
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: New Jersey (you got a problem with that ?)
Contact:

Re: Questions

Post by FUCHSAUDIO »

Joe Mlog wrote:
FUCHSAUDIO wrote:So the transformers are Marvel Magnetics, same supplier to Mesa.

Interesting how they claim "they don't clone" and "don't goop", and do both :).

Boy they love weird "loops", or lack of them.
one minute you're nice, the next minute takin' a shot. Just because we use a given manufacturer, doesn't mean we copied their transformer.
really, Andy, I'm surprised ar you.
Didn't say you did Joe. Simply noting you guys share a supplier. You did (at one time, not sure about present) use Mesa iron in a few amps, did you not ?

Not being mean, and if it sounded like I was, I wasn't...
Proud holder of US Patent # 7336165.
User avatar
novosibir
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Nuremberg, Germany
Contact:

Re: john mayer's two rock??

Post by novosibir »

Go ahead, guys - and have a coffee or a beer together!

We all are only cooking with water - and water doesn't have any secrets, worth to hide :wink:

Larry
Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery
Post Reply