My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
-
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
- Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)
6 others liked this
My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
UPDATE:
I have attached my final schematic with annotations and voltages/part numbers at the bottom of this post. Happy building!
PS: I used a 100W Marshall Output Transformer
Hello everyone! I hope you all have been doing well in this trying time. I have had the good fortune to spend quite a bit of time with a few SSS#005 "clones" as of late, as I have had the good fortune of making acquaintance with a friend who is obsessed with all things Eric Johnson and has several SSS#005 type amps from several of the well known builders. So I thought I would share an interpretation on this amp. I have drawn a layout and schematic of what I have observed, but in the spirit of not cloning anything "to the letter" or to offend sensibilities I won't be offering "carbon copy" information so here goes:
Based on what I can observe, the SSS #005 clones out there share this common refrain: Skyliner EQ, Post PI driver tube, and unusually high negative feedback resistor. Also omits a choke in lieu of a large wirewound resistor. Circuit also seems to use a standard Fender reverb circuit with added Send (Dwell) and Return (level) controls. 12AT7 driver stage uses LNFB like in several Dumble designs.
In my interpretation of this circuit I have made some changes. Ive added Martin Manning's improved step filter design as well as his bipolar Cathode Follower driver power supply circuit that utilizes the 60vAC bias winding tap on a Fender style Power Transformer. Handful of tweaks here and there as well. For the FET stage, I'll be using a PCB for a Echoplex EP3 FET preamp. Running a quad of 6CA7s with a Fender Twin style power transformer for this interpretation.
Schematic and layout are not tested, however I have audited them both several time and can say with likely 90% accuracy that it will work as built, but Caveat Emptor applies. If anyone sees any glaring errors please share
Demo of this build is HERE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qchuuosfnVM
NOTE: THESE HAVE BEEN UPDATED
I have attached my final schematic with annotations and voltages/part numbers at the bottom of this post. Happy building!
PS: I used a 100W Marshall Output Transformer
Hello everyone! I hope you all have been doing well in this trying time. I have had the good fortune to spend quite a bit of time with a few SSS#005 "clones" as of late, as I have had the good fortune of making acquaintance with a friend who is obsessed with all things Eric Johnson and has several SSS#005 type amps from several of the well known builders. So I thought I would share an interpretation on this amp. I have drawn a layout and schematic of what I have observed, but in the spirit of not cloning anything "to the letter" or to offend sensibilities I won't be offering "carbon copy" information so here goes:
Based on what I can observe, the SSS #005 clones out there share this common refrain: Skyliner EQ, Post PI driver tube, and unusually high negative feedback resistor. Also omits a choke in lieu of a large wirewound resistor. Circuit also seems to use a standard Fender reverb circuit with added Send (Dwell) and Return (level) controls. 12AT7 driver stage uses LNFB like in several Dumble designs.
In my interpretation of this circuit I have made some changes. Ive added Martin Manning's improved step filter design as well as his bipolar Cathode Follower driver power supply circuit that utilizes the 60vAC bias winding tap on a Fender style Power Transformer. Handful of tweaks here and there as well. For the FET stage, I'll be using a PCB for a Echoplex EP3 FET preamp. Running a quad of 6CA7s with a Fender Twin style power transformer for this interpretation.
Schematic and layout are not tested, however I have audited them both several time and can say with likely 90% accuracy that it will work as built, but Caveat Emptor applies. If anyone sees any glaring errors please share
Demo of this build is HERE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qchuuosfnVM
NOTE: THESE HAVE BEEN UPDATED
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by beasleybodyshop on Wed Oct 11, 2023 6:42 pm, edited 10 times in total.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
- dorrisant
- Posts: 2639
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:27 pm
- Location: Somewhere between a river and a cornfield
- Contact:
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
Nice work... it figure that you'd gravitate toward an EP booster, right? I'll definitely look for errors later.
(Pulls up a chair)
Did you use Visio on the layout? If so, can you post the original?
(Pulls up a chair)
Did you use Visio on the layout? If so, can you post the original?
"Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned" - Enzo
- norburybrook
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:47 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
2 others liked this
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
Oh dear......
I thought I'd kicked this building lark.....
Is it different enough from a JM wonderland to warrant building?
I suppose I could mod my JM into this and find out
M
I thought I'd kicked this building lark.....
Is it different enough from a JM wonderland to warrant building?
I suppose I could mod my JM into this and find out
M
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
my main worry is the mixing of the dry and wet/reverb signals. Pics somehow suggest that the dry signal is sent to the reverb return pot. Both the wet and dry signal are sent to the input of the pot apparently.
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
-
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
- Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)
1 others liked this
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
Yes the wet and dry signals are mixed in an unusual way. I did confirm this in more than one amp so people are either cloning the same mistake or it works haha!
The larger amount of NFB makes me think the amp would have more chime and grit when turned up. Playing through the 3 amps I spent time with confirms this - but still capable of great clean tones. I'll avoid silly terms for tone descriptions but they all sounded fantastic.
The larger amount of NFB makes me think the amp would have more chime and grit when turned up. Playing through the 3 amps I spent time with confirms this - but still capable of great clean tones. I'll avoid silly terms for tone descriptions but they all sounded fantastic.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
-
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
- Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)
1 others liked this
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
I think the wet/dry is wired in a strange way as to keep the input impedance of the mixter stage from being loaded down by the reverb return.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
-
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
- Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
I used Inkscape. I exported as a PDF to scale so it's kinda large. I could try resending them as PNGs inline or something.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
Thanks a lot for that !!
I was rebuilding a Wonderland and tried today a Skyline mod on it, keeping the same bass pot and tail and quite like it.
Do you have the values of the dropping resistors for the power supply ?
That’s a very important parameter.
I was rebuilding a Wonderland and tried today a Skyline mod on it, keeping the same bass pot and tail and quite like it.
Do you have the values of the dropping resistors for the power supply ?
That’s a very important parameter.
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
the pic suggests that both the wet and dry signal go to the input of the reverb return pot. this can't be the whole truth, unless the dry signal dissappears when you turn down the reverb pot
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
-
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
- Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
Look here. Dry signal connects to top of Return pot. Wiper is attached to the reverb circuit. It is indeed a little odd but i did confirm this.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
-
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
- Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)
1 others liked this
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
Roe, what you are seeing is the output of the filter circuit connecting to the top of the Return pot. Then a second shielded wire is going from that point to the grid input of the mixer stage. Not both wet and dry going to the top of the pot. the WET is connected to the wiper of the Return.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
Sorry but I still see three shielded cables on the pic, two of which connect to the top of the pot and a third which connects to the wiper (in addition to a ground on the bottom of the pot).beasleybodyshop wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 6:43 pm Roe, what you are seeing is the output of the filter circuit connecting to the top of the Return pot. Then a second shielded wire is going from that point to the grid input of the mixer stage. Not both wet and dry going to the top of the pot. the WET is connected to the wiper of the Return.
The layout, by contrast, only got two cables (in addition to ground).
another pic:
My hypothesis is as follows:
Top of pot- one cable connects to the (high) filter, another to the grid of the mixer stage (V4a=
Viper- wet signal from reverb recovery stage
bottom - ground
Last edited by Roe on Thu Apr 02, 2020 7:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
-
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 12:51 am
- Location: East Texas (Yee Yee!)
2 others liked this
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
Yes - the two connections to the top of the Reverb pot are as follows:
1 - output connection from filter circuit
2 - goes from top of reverb Return pot to grid input of next stage
They are using the top of the Return pot as a daisy chain point to go to the grid input of the next stage.
1 - output connection from filter circuit
2 - goes from top of reverb Return pot to grid input of next stage
They are using the top of the Return pot as a daisy chain point to go to the grid input of the next stage.
"It's like what Lenin said... you look for the person who will benefit, and, uh, uh..."
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
great, thanks for the confirmation!beasleybodyshop wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 7:46 pm Yes - the two connections to the top of the Reverb pot are as follows:
1 - output connection from filter circuit
2 - goes from top of reverb Return pot to grid input of next stage
They are using the top of the Return pot as a daisy chain point to go to the grid input of the next stage.
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
- dorrisant
- Posts: 2639
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:27 pm
- Location: Somewhere between a river and a cornfield
- Contact:
Re: My take on Eric Johnson's Steel String Singer #005
No worries... I was just looking to manipulate the original drawing to generate other drawings with differences. If you don't mind, please post the Inkscape file. That will work just as well. Very nice looking layout!beasleybodyshop wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 5:46 pm
I used Inkscape. I exported as a PDF to scale so it's kinda large. I could try resending them as PNGs inline or something.
"Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned" - Enzo