really stupid jack wiring question

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Post Reply
wsaraceni
Posts: 506
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:18 pm

really stupid jack wiring question

Post by wsaraceni »

im building a matchless vibrobox. here is the schematic.

http://www.prowessamplifiers.com/schema ... robox.html

so i have some cliff jacks that id like to wire up for the input and output. i can just never figure out what goes where.

i have the input wired like this

http://www.geckoamps.com/milliAmp/cliff-wiring.jpg

with the other resistor directly on the tube socket.

how does the output get wired?
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by Structo »

The symbols on the schematic look like they are calling for switching or shorting jacks.
I don't really see the need.

The Cliff jacks are a little harder to visualize what's going on inside.

He can use shorting jacks if he wants but this is basically an effect so it will either be in circuit or turned off.
Last edited by Structo on Mon Oct 04, 2010 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
wsaraceni
Posts: 506
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:18 pm

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by wsaraceni »

should it be on that side or the other side? i know one side, when the cable is plugged in, is no longer in contact with the plug. i guess it'll be easy to figure out which one is correct in person.

how does a switching or shorting jack work?
User avatar
selloutrr
Posts: 3694
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:44 am
Location: Southern California

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by selloutrr »

when in doubt plug in a patch cable or instrument cord and meter continuity :wink:
My Daughter Build Stone Henge
Drumslinger
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 4:31 am
Location: USA

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by Drumslinger »

exactly!
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 13161
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by martin manning »

wsaraceni, on Cliff jacks you can see that the terminal/contact pieces are L-shaped, and overlap on the rounded (open) side of the body. The one that is on top is lifted by the plug and remains in contact with it, while losing contact with the terminal underneath. You can just see the tip of the upper terminal on the near side in the picture Structo posted above, meaning the terminals on the far side are the ones that contact the plug, and the wiring he has shown is incorrect.

The jack shown in the Cliff wiring .jpg you posted is wired correctly, and it is wired as a shorting jack, since it shorts the signal lead (center of the coax) to ground when there is no plug inserted. The shield braid is soldered to the sleeve terminal, and the diagonal jumper keeps it connected to the circuit ground at all times. The Vibrobox input and output are wired in exactly the same way as this picture shows. If you're not using shielded cable, you still need the jumper, just omit the shield
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by Bob-I »

Structo wrote:The symbols on the schematic look like they are calling for switching or shorting jacks.
I don't really see the need.
Actually the reason for a switching jack is to ground the input when you pull the cable out, otherwise you'll get some pretty bad hum.
wsaraceni
Posts: 506
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:18 pm

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by wsaraceni »

just so im clear. with no patch cord plugged in, i should see the tip directly to ground. with the patch cord plugged in the tip should see 220k to ground and the sleeve should be grounded always. is that right?
User avatar
Bob-I
Posts: 3791
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Hillsborough NJ

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by Bob-I »

wsaraceni wrote:just so im clear. with no patch cord plugged in, i should see the tip directly to ground. with the patch cord plugged in the tip should see 220k to ground and the sleeve should be grounded always. is that right?
Correct.
User avatar
FYL
Posts: 654
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:05 am

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by FYL »

I believe this is how it should be wired.
Nope, the 220K goes to ground.
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14017
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by M Fowler »

When I recently built my 18w tremolo amp I referenced three layouts and each one was wired differently which drove me nuts.

Did I say I hate Cliff jacks? I understand how they are important grounding wise but geez. :roll:

Mark
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by Structo »

FYL wrote:
I believe this is how it should be wired.
Nope, the 220K goes to ground.
You are right, I guess he isn't the only one that has trouble with cliff jacks.
I haven't used that many myself.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
User avatar
FYL
Posts: 654
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:05 am

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by FYL »

You are right, I guess he isn't the only one that has trouble with cliff jacks.
I haven't used that many myself.
Front = ground
Back = signal

Here's a typical hi/low setup:

[img:730:428]http://triodeamplification.com/images/cliff_hi-lo_2.gif[/img]

From the Triode Amplification web site.
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14017
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: really stupid jack wiring question

Post by M Fowler »

Okay now that makes sense I didn't notice the reversing of the hi/lo positions before. Thanks.
Post Reply