That or it doesn't really matter ;^) Can't hurt, tho.
2nd Gen Build
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- martin manning
- Posts: 13350
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: 2nd Gen Build
Indeed. People much smarter than me and with more amp experience will reach many different conclusions. But I think it is safe to assume that HAD was intentionally orienting the caps in furtherance of some benefit that he perceived, no?martin manning wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:04 pmThat or it doesn't really matter ;^) Can't hurt, tho.
-Dan
- martin manning
- Posts: 13350
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
1 others liked this
Re: 2nd Gen Build
Could be, but who knows? The cap orientation thing was/is an established practice in RF work.
Re: 2nd Gen Build
Hi Dan, thanks for your response. I remember reading this and, as you say, the photos confirm what you say. I have oriented the caps as HAD did and there is definitely no issue with noise, so I guess he was wanting to scoop the mids. My suggestion, if I may, at this point would be to try to be as accurate as you can in replicating #40. It definitely has its own sound which takes a little while to get used to. Be patient and you will fall in love with this amp, I promise you!dbharris wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 1:56 pmHi Dr. D,Dr d wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 12:24 pmHi Dan, I notice that all of your coupling caps shields are orientated toward the pots. Do tell why?dbharris wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 1:00 am Thanks for all of the wire suggestions, I have favorited those for the next time I place an order. Been slow going on the amp while I am swamped at work. But wanted to post a little progress.
Main board
PXL_20240225_223816850~2.jpg
PXL_20240225_223900191.jpg
Power board
PXL_20240225_223629068.MP.jpg
PXL_20240225_223651130.jpg
FET (trying a J201 for this build)
PXL_20240225_223949465.jpg
PXL_20240225_224014672.jpg
Hopefully will have more time this week.
-Dan
If you look at the photos in the 2nd Gen Layout thread, that is how HAD did it. In the 3rd Gen amps, I believe all but one of the caps were also oriented that way (maybe bass, but I am going off memory). I've seen many statements to the effect that coupling cap orientation only changes the noise floor, while others say it is one the many ways HAD would manipulate the timbre of an amp. I would assume it was the timbre that HAD was chasing after as you don't hear comments from people playing or owning authentic 2nd Gen and 3rd Gen amps that they are noisy.
I am interested to hear what this one will sound like...
-Dan
Re: 2nd Gen Build
Very good advice and definitely what I am going for. Your build is really incredible!Dr d wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2024 1:03 pmHi Dan, thanks for your response. I remember reading this and, as you say, the photos confirm what you say. I have oriented the caps as HAD did and there is definitely no issue with noise, so I guess he was wanting to scoop the mids. My suggestion, if I may, at this point would be to try to be as accurate as you can in replicating #40. It definitely has its own sound which takes a little while to get used to. Be patient and you will fall in love with this amp, I promise you!dbharris wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2024 1:56 pmHi Dr. D,
If you look at the photos in the 2nd Gen Layout thread, that is how HAD did it. In the 3rd Gen amps, I believe all but one of the caps were also oriented that way (maybe bass, but I am going off memory). I've seen many statements to the effect that coupling cap orientation only changes the noise floor, while others say it is one the many ways HAD would manipulate the timbre of an amp. I would assume it was the timbre that HAD was chasing after as you don't hear comments from people playing or owning authentic 2nd Gen and 3rd Gen amps that they are noisy.
I am interested to hear what this one will sound like...
-Dan
I also just noticed I tied the V1b and V2b grid resistors to the cathode pins by mistake I'll get that fixed up next time I heat up the iron.
-Dan
Re: 2nd Gen Build
Finished up all of the wiring before adding iron and boards.
Choke is from a 1966 Bassman, measuring 95.5 ohms resistance and 3.193H inductance. Also bought a peak atlas LCR meter. Way more accurate on capacitance than my meters and none of mine could do inductance/impedance anyways.
There was a slight difference in the inductance depending on which lead was connected to red or back probes. It made me think of Ian and Stephen and others comments that the "direction" of the choke will change the sound/response of an amp (I understand many don't agree with that as well). The measured difference was 3.188H vs 3.193H at 1Khz. The inductance would start higher and settle down to those repeatedly depending on how the leads were connected. Small difference, but it is there. Whether it is perceivable or even if that is what is causing a perceived tonal difference...I do not know.
I still need test the OT for turns ratio, etc. should I measure L anywhere while I am at it?
-Dan
Choke is from a 1966 Bassman, measuring 95.5 ohms resistance and 3.193H inductance. Also bought a peak atlas LCR meter. Way more accurate on capacitance than my meters and none of mine could do inductance/impedance anyways.
There was a slight difference in the inductance depending on which lead was connected to red or back probes. It made me think of Ian and Stephen and others comments that the "direction" of the choke will change the sound/response of an amp (I understand many don't agree with that as well). The measured difference was 3.188H vs 3.193H at 1Khz. The inductance would start higher and settle down to those repeatedly depending on how the leads were connected. Small difference, but it is there. Whether it is perceivable or even if that is what is causing a perceived tonal difference...I do not know.
I still need test the OT for turns ratio, etc. should I measure L anywhere while I am at it?
-Dan
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: 2nd Gen Build
More Iron:
1973 Fender Bassman PT 1967 Fender Bassman OT -Dan
1973 Fender Bassman PT 1967 Fender Bassman OT -Dan
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by dbharris on Tue Apr 09, 2024 12:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 2nd Gen Build
The choke orientation is definitely significant. Those who can't tell the difference must be hard of hearing!dbharris wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 8:52 pm Finished up all of the wiring before adding iron and boards.
PXL_20240330_203940665.jpg
PXL_20240330_204008224.jpg
Choke is from a 1966 Bassman, measuring 95.5 ohms resistance and 3.193H inductance. Also bought a peak atlas LCR meter. Way more accurate on capacitance than my meters and none of mine could do inductance/impedance anyways.
PXL_20240330_204055215.jpg
PXL_20240330_204109262.jpg
There was a slight difference in the inductance depending on which lead was connected to red or back probes. It made me think of Ian and Stephen and others comments that the "direction" of the choke will change the sound/response of an amp (I understand many don't agree with that as well). The measured difference was 3.188H vs 3.193H at 1Khz. The inductance would start higher and settle down to those repeatedly depending on how the leads were connected. Small difference, but it is there. Whether it is perceivable or even if that is what is causing a perceived tonal difference...I do not know.
I still need test the OT for turns ratio, etc. should I measure L anywhere while I am at it?
-Dan
Nice iron you have there!
Re: 2nd Gen Build
I am planning to test it out on this amp and also my 102. I need pull that chassis and rebalance the PI now that I have a new quad of power tubes.Dr d wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2024 8:43 pmThe choke orientation is definitely significant. Those who can't tell the difference must be hard of hearing!dbharris wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 8:52 pm Finished up all of the wiring before adding iron and boards.
PXL_20240330_203940665.jpg
PXL_20240330_204008224.jpg
Choke is from a 1966 Bassman, measuring 95.5 ohms resistance and 3.193H inductance. Also bought a peak atlas LCR meter. Way more accurate on capacitance than my meters and none of mine could do inductance/impedance anyways.
PXL_20240330_204055215.jpg
PXL_20240330_204109262.jpg
There was a slight difference in the inductance depending on which lead was connected to red or back probes. It made me think of Ian and Stephen and others comments that the "direction" of the choke will change the sound/response of an amp (I understand many don't agree with that as well). The measured difference was 3.188H vs 3.193H at 1Khz. The inductance would start higher and settle down to those repeatedly depending on how the leads were connected. Small difference, but it is there. Whether it is perceivable or even if that is what is causing a perceived tonal difference...I do not know.
I still need test the OT for turns ratio, etc. should I measure L anywhere while I am at it?
-Dan
Nice iron you have there!
Excited to see (hear) these results.
-Dan
Re: 2nd Gen Build
A bit more progress, all iron mounted and most of the power amp wired up. I put a little ring of shrink tube on one lead of the choke to keep it straight when swapping later.
-Dan
-Dan
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: 2nd Gen Build
Hi Dan, its all looking fantastic and coming together quickly. Btw, how have you grounded your output jacks? I ended up grounding the loop on the pots grounding bar and the output jacks to a ground lug next V4. Hope that helps in some way.
ATB
ATB
Re: 2nd Gen Build
Good eyes! I had not really decided where to ground it and hadn't considered moving the loop ground to the bus bar. I think I will do just that! In prior builds I relied on one of the output jacks keeping a good connection to the chassis.
As a side note, I may disconnect all of the jacks from the chassis temporarily and use a drill but to chase out the holes. I think perhaps with metric vs imperial they are all a bit snug and I was not positive the isolation washers are keeping things isolated. I am going to do some continuity tests and go from there. I should have gone down that road about a month ago lol.
My head cab arrives today, so now I have more incentive to wrap up the build.
-Dan
Re: 2nd Gen Build
Made some more progress today. Just the preamp heaters left, then smoke test, etc. Planning to get it up and running before hooking up the FET board.
-Dan
-Dan
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- ijedouglas
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 9:07 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: 2nd Gen Build
Looks great! Remember to add the 150K from the FET as its part of the dropping string. If you don't your voltages will be higher than expected
Ian
Re: 2nd Gen Build
Great point, Ian. I'll solder the B+ for the FET board but won't connect the input and output yet. Right now I just have some clipped leads soldered in where the bias resistor will go so that I can alligator clip those into a bread board later.ijedouglas wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 2:21 am Looks great! Remember to add the 150K from the FET as its part of the dropping string. If you don't your voltages will be higher than expected
Thanks!