Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

General discussion area for tube amps.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

Smokebreak
Posts: 1391
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:53 pm
Location: Texas

Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by Smokebreak »

Built a 5E5A Pro into an old chassis yesterday that had a Classic Tone PT w a low V secondary, and a 1750M OT. It sounds fantastic but I'm curious about the power supply.

I wired it up "normally", so to speak, with the choke(ok not really.....a 330r 5W resistor) in between the plates and screens, and added screen resistors
Of course a lot of these early tweeds had the choke before the plates, with the choke bearing the full current draw of the tubes. The screen supply is also connect to the OT centertap/plate supply.

I went to buy a choke big enough to handle the job, and they're like $50! My curiosity dwindled pretty quickly, but if I were to implement the supply just like the schematic, what can I expect different in feel or tone?
Also of note, I'm using GZ34 for less drop, and my voltages are pretty much spot on w/ Leo's. Also using a 12ax7 in V2, as I could only find one 12ay7 around here.

Also taking speaker recommendations....The box I have for the chassis has a 12" baffle so I'll go with that....already have a 15" combo anyways ;)
I'm feeling like an alnico is warranted here...looking at the Fat Jimmy A1260 and Celestion Cream Alnico. Thanks!

image_2551.gif
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 13316
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by martin manning »

Hammond 194G at 3H 250 mA should be good for that, that are under $25 retail. A CLC input will take most of the ripple voltage off the B+. I have no direct experience, but I would think that should reduce intermodulation with the guitar notes and move towards an overall cleaner tone.
User avatar
pompeiisneaks
Site Admin
Posts: 4222
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
Location: Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by pompeiisneaks »

martin manning wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:07 pm Hammond 194G at 3H 250 mA should be good for that, that are under $25 retail. A CLC input will take most of the ripple voltage off the B+. I have no direct experience, but I would think that should reduce intermodulation with the guitar notes and move towards an overall cleaner tone.
Agreed, also a simple path to go without a choke is to just increase filtering. Often that's a trick HAD used to make an amp cleaner... more filtering. Back in the old days I think transformers were almost cheaper than the electrolytic capacitors. Thus having the choke in path to filter out that ripple was cheaper than the caps, now electrolytic caps are dirt cheap and copper is through the roof ;)

Edit; To clarify, by cleaner I mean cleaner power, not like, cleaner headroom or something :)
~Phil
tUber Nerd!
Roe
Posts: 1652
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by Roe »

Hammond got some nice big chokes. A CLC or Pi filter sounds and feels different from the standard power supplies with high filtering
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
User avatar
bepone
Posts: 1607
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: Croatia
Contact:

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by bepone »

Smokebreak wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:05 pm I went to buy a choke big enough to handle the job, and they're like $50! My curiosity dwindled pretty quickly, but if I were to implement the supply just like the schematic, what can I expect different in feel or tone?
CLC is standard in HiFi both for S.Ended and Push pull. You will loose all hum and can expect apsolutely no noise from the amp output section, remain only humm from your layout and grounding methods :P

no noise also in case of imbalanced output section (heavilly dismatched tubes which would create humm in other amps)

about the sound.. i'm not sure that this is the best solution for guitar amp.. loosing modulation od plate voltages from highish ripple..there was some study online about , and people at the end didn't like completely DC filtered anodes..
Smokebreak wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:05 pm I'm feeling like an alnico is warranted here...looking at the Fat Jimmy A1260 and Celestion Cream Alnico. Thanks!
cant miss with Alnico Cream, i have it very smooth, for my many friends top speaker, also in 1x12"
Roe
Posts: 1652
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by Roe »

bepone wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:00 am
about the sound.. i'm not sure that this is the best solution for guitar amp.. loosing modulation od plate voltages from highish ripple..there was some study online about , and people at the end didn't like completely DC filtered anodes..
+ 1 for push-pull amps, although it is great for single ended amps (and some exceptional cases perhaps)
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
User avatar
Colossal
Posts: 5050
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:04 pm
Location: Moving through Kashmir

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by Colossal »

I build SE amps with a CLC up front. The inductor will need to handle the full rated current of the amp at idle, etc, so they can get large. I use a fairly high inductance with low DCR, so as not to drop too much voltage. As Bepone said, it makes for a dead quiet amp.

Yes, I forget who wrote that article (maybe Kuehnel?) about how some power supply modulation was an essential part of the tone and feel of an old Bassman.
User avatar
martin manning
Posts: 13316
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by martin manning »

Yes Keuhnel. It’s in his 5F6-A book.
pdf64
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by pdf64 »

pompeiisneaks wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:19 pm … a simple path to go without a choke is to just increase filtering…
That might not be an option if a valve rectifier is being used.
User avatar
pompeiisneaks
Site Admin
Posts: 4222
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
Location: Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by pompeiisneaks »

pdf64 wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:47 pm
pompeiisneaks wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:19 pm … a simple path to go without a choke is to just increase filtering…
That might not be an option if a valve rectifier is being used.
My understanding is this is only for the first filter post rectifier no? I.e. you have a rectifier's max capacitance rating but only for the first cap? Then you can increase the filtering afterwards... correct? Or is that a max per capacitor in every filtering position?

~Phil
tUber Nerd!
User avatar
mhuss
Posts: 490
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:09 am
Location: SE PA, USA
Contact:

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by mhuss »

Yeah, it's mainly for the first cap, although an additional 220uF 100 ohms away will also affect things. :) The spec is about peak current, which is proportional to the amount of electrons needed to fill that cap up to normal from zero.
pdf64
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Staffordshire, UK

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by pdf64 »

pompeiisneaks wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:07 pm
pdf64 wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:47 pm
pompeiisneaks wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:19 pm … a simple path to go without a choke is to just increase filtering…
That might not be an option if a valve rectifier is being used.
My understanding is this is only for the first filter post rectifier no? I.e. you have a rectifier's max capacitance rating but only for the first cap? Then you can increase the filtering afterwards... correct? Or is that a max per capacitor in every filtering position?

~Phil
Sorry, given the context, I took an increase in the reservoir cap value as being implicit. ie how / where else to increase filtering to get the same result as the 5E5a’s pi filter?
User avatar
pompeiisneaks
Site Admin
Posts: 4222
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
Location: Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by pompeiisneaks »

Maybe I too missed something, but looking at the 5E5 it uses a 5U4GB that can take a 40uF cap at the first node, the 5E5 uses only 16uF. All of those 16UF caps could be upped to 32 easily for a much stiffer power supply and cleaner power without adding a choke. for 40$ you have 4 30ish uF caps that would filter that noise really well. Of course a single choke sub 40$ gets you a lot, but then you still have less filtering at all subsequent nodes too.

Again, I might be missing the point, please forgive me if so :D

~Phil
tUber Nerd!
Roe
Posts: 1652
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 pm

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by Roe »

CLC filters are great on ac30s and ac15s
www.myspace.com/20bonesband
www.myspace.com/prostitutes
Express, Comet 60, Jtm45, jtm50, jmp50, 6g6b, vibroverb, champster, alessandro rottweiler
4x12" w/H75s
Smokebreak
Posts: 1391
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:53 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Choke placement in early Tweed circuits

Post by Smokebreak »

Roe wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:43 am Hammond got some nice big chokes. A CLC or Pi filter sounds and feels different from the standard power supplies with high filtering

This is what I'm after, right here. In what way would you say? better yet, would you say CLC sounds different that a standard supply with "normal" filtering? Something that I guess goes without saying (but hasn't really been brought up) is that increasing the filtering will change the feel of the amp, something I don't want to go too far with, in a Tweed amp.
However I started with 22uf across the board in this amp
Post Reply