Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Fender Amp Discussion

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

aermotor
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2024 10:34 pm

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by aermotor »

Reporting back after some discovery. Got the filter caps changed out, new 3 wire power cord and some other misc done.

Fired it up and she works out of the box, here's what I found.

The 'Vibrato Pedal' foot switch on the back has been modified to indeed enable a new OD 'distortion' circuit as Reeltarded and dcribbs1412 said —absolutely wild. The added relay in place of the tube is what's switching the distortion. It appears—though not certain— Normal 1 being the most distortion and Vib 2 being the least, more testing required.

The front 'Presence' knob now acts as a sort of master volume for the whole thing. 'Intensity' is a secondary channel vol for the Vib channel that allows you to turn the main Vib volume all the way up and drive it into the intensity volume for as much distortion for the desired effect.

That's the main discovery, and as weird as it is, it's pretty trick. Old timers modifying their gear to get their own sounds. Vibrato circuit is gone in its place, but that's a worthy sacrifice for now.

After hearing this and understand a bit more it's clear what the intention was, and I can appreciate it. Going to leave it alone for the time being and get some play time in on it.

Secured an early 60s blond 2x12 cabinet I will get outfitted and hooked up to it as well.
Last edited by aermotor on Sat Nov 09, 2024 10:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Stevem
Posts: 4757
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by Stevem »

It’s very good to hear that you did not just condemn it and take a wrecking ball to it.

Someone who might had passed on put a lot of thought and time into that.
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!

Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
sluckey
Posts: 3237
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:48 pm
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by sluckey »

aermotor wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2024 10:06 pm The added transformer in place of the tube is what is driving the distortion.
That metal box that replaced V4 (p/o vibrator circuit) is NOT a transformer. It's a RELAY.
aermotor
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2024 10:34 pm

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by aermotor »

Stevem wrote: Sat Nov 09, 2024 12:40 pm It’s very good to hear that you did not just condemn it and take a wrecking ball to it.

Someone who might had passed on put a lot of thought and time into that.
Haha yea, it was good to at least get it fired up again to understand a bit more what was going on. Ideally I need someone to trace out a schematic on it.
sluckey wrote: Sat Nov 09, 2024 1:17 pm
aermotor wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2024 10:06 pm The added transformer in place of the tube is what is driving the distortion.
That metal box that replaced V4 (p/o vibrator circuit) is NOT a transformer. It's a RELAY.
Yep my bad sorry lol
User avatar
dorrisant
Posts: 2696
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:27 pm
Location: Somewhere between a river and a cornfield
Contact:

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by dorrisant »

Welcome to the forum!!

If you are willing to post a few more pics as the conversation goes, we could help to cipher a schematic from that and what is already posted. Are you comfortable with taking some voltage readings, or resistance measurements? If so, you have plenty of good eyes around here that do that sort of thing for the fun of it. I'm sure others would agree.
"Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned" - Enzo
aermotor
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2024 10:34 pm

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by aermotor »

I would love to do that, just let me know what specific more photos and where to check voltages.
dcribbs1412
Posts: 1380
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:56 pm
Location: Arizona Desert

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by dcribbs1412 »

The 180k/3.3M (with small cap) resistors are different from 180k/1M in original Gen2-3 as is the 100k/82k PI
56k NFB resistor?
Any sort of sound clip would also be nice if possible.
User avatar
dorrisant
Posts: 2696
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:27 pm
Location: Somewhere between a river and a cornfield
Contact:

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by dorrisant »

aermotor wrote: Mon Nov 11, 2024 5:57 pm I would love to do that, just let me know what specific more photos and where to check voltages.
Straight(er) shots of the components attached to the pots. Also, some of the ceramic caps and ODs are not clear because the pic is shit from directly above. Maybe skew to the side so we can see the values.
"Education is what you're left with after you have forgotten what you have learned" - Enzo
aermotor
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2024 10:34 pm

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by aermotor »

Got it on the photos, I'll take some more.

New question, in the power filter cap section, I'm noticing a 27K was removed and replaced with a jumper, and the other values are not factory.

Should be 27K, 27K, 4.7K, 27K but its currently 4.7K, 27K, 6.2K, Jumper — Do I put those back to factory values, or is it like that due to the removal of a tube and other mods that were made?

Image
sluckey
Posts: 3237
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:48 pm
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by sluckey »

aermotor wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 3:17 am Should be 27K, 27K, 4.7K, 27K but its currently 4.7K, 27K, 6.2K, Jumper — Do I put those back to factory values, or is it like that due to the removal of a tube and other mods that were made?
LET IT BE! The jumper is because of the removal of the vibrato circuit. This is no longer a 1962 Blonde Bandmaster. The person that did this extensive mod knew what he was doing.
ampdan
Posts: 95
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: SE Wisconsin

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by ampdan »

sluckey wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:06 am This is no longer a 1962 Blonde Bandmaster. The person that did this extensive mod knew what he was doing.
That's indeed a shame. As someone who was buying/selling this stuff in the 70's-80's, when these mods were made, this was already a desirable amp.
Yes he did. It's the implementation of the mods...
aermotor
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2024 10:34 pm

Re: Bastardized 1962 Blonde Bandmaster

Post by aermotor »

sluckey wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:06 am
aermotor wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 3:17 am Should be 27K, 27K, 4.7K, 27K but its currently 4.7K, 27K, 6.2K, Jumper — Do I put those back to factory values, or is it like that due to the removal of a tube and other mods that were made?
LET IT BE! The jumper is because of the removal of the vibrato circuit. This is no longer a 1962 Blonde Bandmaster. The person that did this extensive mod knew what he was doing.
Yep good call, thanks again. Definitely not a BM anymore haha.
ampdan wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 2:26 pm
sluckey wrote: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:06 am This is no longer a 1962 Blonde Bandmaster. The person that did this extensive mod knew what he was doing.
That's indeed a shame. As someone who was buying/selling this stuff in the 70's-80's, when these mods were made, this was already a desirable amp.
Yes he did. It's the implementation of the mods...
I truly wish it was factory as well.
Post Reply