Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
- Reeltarded
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
- Location: GA USA
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
Mikey, buy a worn out JTM-45 reissue and you can be up and running in less than a day. Seriously inexpensive way.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
Yea your right Miles,I'm sure I could get my metro plexi to sound just as good with some advice from you guys here.it actually sounds real good with the master vol .Even the cleans sound good. Better yet buy some good tubes ,bias it,call it a day
Custom Built Amps for Sale!http://faithamps.weebly.com/
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
[quote=Reeltarded post_id=391133 time=1541178091 user_id=6156]
Mikey, buy a worn out JTM-45 reissue and you can be up and running in less than a day. Seriously inexpensive way.
[/quote]
Actually a Plexi / 1987x reissue would be better. The original Shirley has a 3k4 OT primary. A JTM45 OT won't sound right.
Mikey, buy a worn out JTM-45 reissue and you can be up and running in less than a day. Seriously inexpensive way.
[/quote]
Actually a Plexi / 1987x reissue would be better. The original Shirley has a 3k4 OT primary. A JTM45 OT won't sound right.
- Reeltarded
- Posts: 10027
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
- Location: GA USA
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
I owe Mike some parts.
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:38 pm
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
Anyone have a Dirty Shirley Mini schematic or layout? I would like to build one, lots of good info and pictures in this thread. Thanks!
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
Here is one posted some time in the past.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- pompeiisneaks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4228
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:36 pm
- Location: Washington State, USA
- Contact:
1 others liked this
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
I actually went digging once and found a few more pages of that same hand drawn style by the same guy, this ones the BE100, just for more context on the common mods:
~Phil
~Phil
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
tUber Nerd!
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
I hope this will be helpful
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
Oh, sorry. So it will be correct
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:38 pm
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
Many thanks!
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
Hello all.
I bought a DS-40 head last week. Great amp.
One thing I am curious about:
My amp was built in November 2017 (hand-written date on chassis). While it is obviously extremely well-designed, well-built, and mostly hand-wired, it does include a printed circuit board. I don’t have any problem with the fact that the amp is constructed with a PCB, and I love the amp- no complaints at all. I just question whether or not it is accurate to still be claiming these are “hand-wired” amps(??). I know the Dirty Shirley started as entirely hand-wired (like the first ten years of Marshall amps were hand-wired). But when Marshall started with PCB construction in mid-1973, it has always been my understanding that they were no longer considered to be “hand-wired” (even though they were still very well-built, still sounded great, and there was still quite a bit of hand wiring and hand assembly required). Isn’t Friedman now using PCB the exact same thing?
Joe
I bought a DS-40 head last week. Great amp.
One thing I am curious about:
My amp was built in November 2017 (hand-written date on chassis). While it is obviously extremely well-designed, well-built, and mostly hand-wired, it does include a printed circuit board. I don’t have any problem with the fact that the amp is constructed with a PCB, and I love the amp- no complaints at all. I just question whether or not it is accurate to still be claiming these are “hand-wired” amps(??). I know the Dirty Shirley started as entirely hand-wired (like the first ten years of Marshall amps were hand-wired). But when Marshall started with PCB construction in mid-1973, it has always been my understanding that they were no longer considered to be “hand-wired” (even though they were still very well-built, still sounded great, and there was still quite a bit of hand wiring and hand assembly required). Isn’t Friedman now using PCB the exact same thing?
Joe
- martin manning
- Posts: 13559
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
2 others liked this
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
There are semantics and shades of gray here. I would say an amp with a machine stuffed pcb, with jacks, pots, and tube sockets mounted thereto, is definitely not a hand wired amp. Think Fender HRD. A pcb with chassis mounted jacks, pots, and tube sockets has a significant amount of hand wiring even if the pcb is machine stuffed, and odds are it will be much more durable since the pcb won’t be subjected to mechanical stress in use. Modern two-sided pcb's will be more durable than the single sided boards seen in those 70’s Marshall’s, approaching the strength of a turret or eyelet board, I think. If it’s hand stuffed and has flying leads, it’s hardly any different labor-wise.
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
martin manning wrote: ↑Wed Apr 10, 2019 7:57 pm There are semantics and shades of gray here. I would say an amp with a machine stuffed pcb, with jacks, pots, and tube sockets mounted thereto, is definitely not a hand wired amp. Think Fender HRD. A pcb with chassis mounted jacks, pots, and tube sockets has a significant amount of hand wiring even if the pcb is machine stuffed, and odds are it will be much more durable since the pcb won’t be subjected to mechanical stress in use. Modern two-sided pcb's will be more durable than the single sided boards seen in those 70’s Marshall’s, approaching the strength of a turret or eyelet board, I think. If it’s hand stuffed and has flying leads, it’s hardly any different labor-wise.
Thank you for your thoughts. I don’t know if the PCB is is hand-stuffed, but my guess is “yes”. Below is a link to a photo I snapped, which I should have included in my initial post; if I figure out how to make the photo appear in the post, instead of just a link, I’ll re-post this.
https://flic.kr/p/RJaAgR
- martin manning
- Posts: 13559
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:43 am
- Location: 39°06' N 84°30' W
Re: Friedman Dirty Shirley thoughts.
That’s basically an eyelet board type of construction, and I’d say calling it “hand wired” is not exaggerating.