HAHAHA, I used to have that very Casio!TheHandsomeOrk wrote:what is note-flipping if not bloom?
plenty of note-rolling in this clip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPlURhoP ... re=related
although tag won't admitt to it.

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
HAHAHA, I used to have that very Casio!TheHandsomeOrk wrote:what is note-flipping if not bloom?
plenty of note-rolling in this clip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPlURhoP ... re=related
although tag won't admitt to it.
Feed back and note flipping are totally different things. What I am calling note flipping is when it sounds like it shifts phase. Scott, it should flip easier with more treble. Vibrato,If you cant hear it in my very first post where I even give the time, I do not think you are going to be able to hear it. That is a great example that is really easy to hear IMO.vibratoking wrote:I don't understand what a 'stranger bloom without the highs' means. Any care to elaborate further or post a clip with a clearly identified example? I enjoy the clips that have been posted, but does it really take 50 notes to give an example? It means that many notes don't have the 'feature' that the poster is trying to highlight.
How about a clip with one note that is a good example of flipping and one note with bloom without feedback? Just a single note that leaves no questions about what the poster is describing.
The term bloom has a descriptive connotation that makes sense, at least to me. Flipping does not, at least in my mind.
BobW wrote:Guys, since the threads that Tag provides comments into, always get spun up and steered to being ALL about Tag (mr. dumble, in his own mind) why does anyone continue to support and perpetuate this? I now laugh at his immature, ego-centric antics, and don't care if this guy owned 10 Dumbles.
Ahh now I get it thanks Scott! I can hear the difference now that you mention it. I use alot of presence and when I get bloom it gets a really nice noticable "boost" in the higher harmonics, while still leaving all the lows that were there before. On command i'll get the flipping as well, it's a little strange at first when it first "moves" but once flipped it's like a warmer bloom IMO. I prefer the higher harmonics of the former as it sounds very rich and pleasant to my ears.dogears wrote:Note flipping is bloom minus the highs. Pinner and I confirmed over my house. When we used the amp with no cables, no bright cap, she went into nice feedback and bloom. When we used the cables, it rolled and compressed the highs, what was left was a stranger bloom that had wierd artifacts...the flip thing.
Steve, care to chime in??
+1 but then again theres some amps that are very difficult to pull it off.stevlech wrote:I think playing technique is a major factor in note "flipping". Sure, the harmonic richness of the amp(s) accentuate the effect and maybe sag contributes as well, but that sound really comes from the player's hands IMO.
The point is not whether I can hear 'it'. The point is that all of the previous posts have alot of things to hear. Tag- thanks for the last post with the almost single notes. That is what I was asking for. I simply want to make sure we are all talking about the exact same features of the notes or the discussion is meaningless.Vibrato,If you cant hear it in my very first post where I even give the time, I do not think you are going to be able to hear it. That is a great example that is really easy to hear IMO.
vibratoking wrote:Rock. I think jazz mode was intended to have less bloom and feedback due to hollow body "jazz" guitars already being prone to feedback. Jazz mode seems to eliminate it by cutting a good bit of low mids out. JMOAgain I ask, does the bloom predominantly happen in rock mode vs jazz mode for most of you guys? My experience is that it mainly happens in rock mode and seldom, if at all, in jazz mode.
Hi JDOxO,JD0x0 wrote: I think jazz mode was intended to have less bloom and feedback due to hollow body "jazz" guitars already being prone to feedback. Jazz mode seems to eliminate it by cutting a good bit of low mids out. JMO