1972 BASSMAN 100
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2014 5:41 pm
1972 BASSMAN 100
HELLO people i made a video of this project and let me know your thoughts. i did some mods since the video. An experienced person went throught thre extra effort since the video. \\richard 562-3384419,
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
richard
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2014 5:41 pm
bassman 100
the master volume circuit was put to the fender pre cbs circuit style.\the power tubes were replaced. \the bias is wired to pre cbs specs, the filter caps were replaced and capacitanced brought up, with metal caps. \richard 5623384419
richard
-
- Posts: 4987
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
- Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.
Re: 1972 BASSMAN 100
Your talk of a pre cbs master volume set is way wrong as Fender was sold to cbs in 1965 and the first master volume on a fender amp came about in the 1970s!
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!
Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!
Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Re: 1972 BASSMAN 100
Are u auditioning for a role as TAG announcer? Do u realize u just posted 3;30 of u talking and that is 3;30 of my life I will never get back
If Hendrix had lived would he have been as good as EDDIE? (Shaver that is)
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2014 5:41 pm
Steve baseman 100
Hey I don't understand your comments steve. This particular amp is a 1972 bassmann 100. Here is a bit of information. In 1965 or there abouts in time Leo fender sold fender musical instruments to CBS. CBS had ideas about how the amps should be designed. CBS implented a self adjusting bias. I do not like this. CBS added a master volume so club owners can turn down musicians. I do like this. They also added an extra capasitor on each side of the push pull power output tubes. I dont like this. In 1972 there ideas about were well established. I do not like their designs or sound. I also know some of the out put transformers were underpowered in the CBS era. One amp might be advertise to be 100 watts but in fact that particular amp may be as low as 60 watts in power. I was lucky that this output trans is strong at 85 watts. The amp is not 100 but a hard strong 85 watts. I will post a video of how the amps sounds now.
The modification that was performed at present time. Leo fender pre CBS bias supply circuit 1965 era, master volume cicuit removed although the knob is still there it is not wired, the pre amp circuit is Leo fender mid sixties style with a lot more gain. More to come. Next job is installing a better output transformer with a power rating 100 to 120 watts. I will not install the new transformer untill the original one burns. thanks Richard Salazar 5623384419
The modification that was performed at present time. Leo fender pre CBS bias supply circuit 1965 era, master volume cicuit removed although the knob is still there it is not wired, the pre amp circuit is Leo fender mid sixties style with a lot more gain. More to come. Next job is installing a better output transformer with a power rating 100 to 120 watts. I will not install the new transformer untill the original one burns. thanks Richard Salazar 5623384419
richard
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:57 am
- Location: chino hills ca.
Re: 1972 BASSMAN 100
I think this thread should be in the FENDER Discussion section. Can it be relocated? Sometimes a good clear photo (well lit) of before and after mods will suffice, with details. The vid is to dark and , well... and some of your methods of making changes are not what I would do. I usually try to bring back amp to optimum original specs before beginning any mods/ tweaks. As for replacing the xfmr you maybe in for a long haul. Very good iron IMO.
Just my 3 cents. Good luck
Just my 3 cents. Good luck
-
- Posts: 2640
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Re: 1972 BASSMAN 100
Actually, this thread would be better off placed in a black hole...can't it moved there?
Re: 1972 BASSMAN 100
I second the motion for sending to a black hole. Do I hear a third?
- Leo_Gnardo
- Posts: 2585
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 1:33 pm
- Location: Dogpatch-on-Hudson
Re: Steve baseman 100
Some days I'm very happy I have no way to download videos. Today is one of those days.
In some amps, Bassman and Super Reverb most notably, CBS tried a combination self bias and fixed bias. Worked like crap and sounded that way too. Easy to modify to fixed. Takes maybe 15 minutes. If you're slow.
Master Volume was added in another half ass attempt to let musicians dial up their amp for distortion. After having modified the circuit to minimize distortion. Go figure. Worked OK in Marshalls, not so much in Fenders. Sounds awful, not awesome.
Extra bias cap for more filtering in many larger amps, did that too, not much harm there.
Extra 0.002 cap from output tube grid to ground. Rolls off high frequencies. You can clip 'em out in less time than it took to type this sentence if you don't like 'em. Then put 'em back if your ears decide you made a mistake. All a matter of taste.
Get a hold of Gerald Weber, you could teach him a lot. About B.S.
We're not impressed. Neither are our friends. And we have some high ranking friends, some good looking smart and talented ones too.
AFAIK the contract was signed 5 JAN 1965salazarich wrote: This particular amp is a 1972 bassmann 100. Here is a bit of information. In 1965 or there abouts in time Leo fender sold fender musical instruments to CBS.
A half ass attempt to make them more "hi fi." Didn't go over well with musicians.CBS had ideas about how the amps should be designed.
No self bias in any amp bigger than a Champ and the CBS geniuses left the Champ and VibroChamp alone. From Princeton on up, "fixed bias" which in many cases is adjustable. Before AND after the CBS takeover.CBS implented a self adjusting bias. I do not like this.
In some amps, Bassman and Super Reverb most notably, CBS tried a combination self bias and fixed bias. Worked like crap and sounded that way too. Easy to modify to fixed. Takes maybe 15 minutes. If you're slow.
Just about anybody who attempts to fiddle with a muso's amp settings will end up with a guitar-shaped lump on their skull, then and now.CBS added a master volume so club owners can turn down musicians. I do like this.
Master Volume was added in another half ass attempt to let musicians dial up their amp for distortion. After having modified the circuit to minimize distortion. Go figure. Worked OK in Marshalls, not so much in Fenders. Sounds awful, not awesome.
Extra cap on each side of the master volume, yes they did that.They also added an extra capasitor on each side of the push pull power output tubes. I dont like this. In 1972 there ideas about were well established.
Extra bias cap for more filtering in many larger amps, did that too, not much harm there.
Extra 0.002 cap from output tube grid to ground. Rolls off high frequencies. You can clip 'em out in less time than it took to type this sentence if you don't like 'em. Then put 'em back if your ears decide you made a mistake. All a matter of taste.
I do not like green eggs and ham.I do not like their designs or sound.
Specsmanship. How many watts, at what distortion level. An amp measured at clip will measure a lot more at 5 or 10 or 20 or more % distortion. You can add 12% to the power figure for every 5% additional distortion. A 65W amp becomes a 100W amp measured at clip, then at 20% distortion, making NO changes in circuitry or transformers. Nothing new here, NEXT...I also know some of the out put transformers were underpowered in the CBS era. One amp might be advertise to be 100 watts but in fact that particular amp may be as low as 60 watts in power. I was lucky that this output trans is strong at 85 watts. The amp is not 100 but a hard strong 85 watts.
Pleeeeeeze, spare us.I will post a video of how the amps sounds now.
Do you NEED a lot more gain? Guitar, maybe. Bass, no thank you.The modification that was performed at present time. Leo fender pre CBS bias supply circuit 1965 era, master volume cicuit removed although the knob is still there it is not wired, the pre amp circuit is Leo fender mid sixties style with a lot more gain.
Waste your money any way you want. Only so much power is available from the power supply. You can put in a 500W rated OT and the power supply will still poop out at 85W. Output transformers DO NOT manufacture power. Just a gearbox, like a car transmission that's all. Unless you put in a bigger engine (power supply) you'll top out at the same mark. How frustrating.More to come. Next job is installing a better output transformer with a power rating 100 to 120 watts. I will not install the new transformer untill the original one burns. thanks Richard Salazar 5623384419
Get a hold of Gerald Weber, you could teach him a lot. About B.S.
We're not impressed. Neither are our friends. And we have some high ranking friends, some good looking smart and talented ones too.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
down technical blind alleys . . .
- JazzGuitarGimp
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:54 pm
- Location: Northern CA
Re: 1972 BASSMAN 100
Thanks for the laugh, Leo - I needed that! 

Lou Rossi Designs
Printed Circuit Design & Layout,
and Schematic Capture
Printed Circuit Design & Layout,
and Schematic Capture
- Leo_Gnardo
- Posts: 2585
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 1:33 pm
- Location: Dogpatch-on-Hudson
Re: 1972 BASSMAN 100
I learned from Col. Hackworth, you gotta out-G the G. In this case out-C the C, C for clown. Big red nose and all. Go ahead, squeeze the weeze. See I'm a bozo, doesn't hurt a bit. At least I know it. Hey let's go to the funway, maybe we can beat up some toasters or sumpin'.JazzGuitarGimp wrote:Thanks for the laugh, Leo - I needed that!
When the BS is running deep, bamboozle 'em with facts. Lost a couple jobs that way... clowns don't like it. Too bad, let 'em stew. They never prosper.
Thank YOU JGG!

down technical blind alleys . . .
Re: 1972 BASSMAN 100
I think Richard wants us to call him up on the phone!salazarich wrote: \\richard 562-3384419,
While you have him on the line, ask about his hot rod trucks! Google that phone # and this is what you get! http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/thre ... od.865870/
- Reeltarded
- Posts: 10144
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:38 am
- Location: GA USA
Re: 1972 BASSMAN 100
And this is why my folks named me after three other people woohoo
#googleproof
#googleproof
Signatures have a 255 character limit that I could abuse, but I am not Cecil B. DeMille.
-
- Posts: 2640
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:55 pm
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Re: 1972 BASSMAN 100
Wait a minute, this guy hasn't reached epic proportions yet. Not at all like Burgess, yet.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2014 5:41 pm
thanks
I am sorry for posting my this thread. I do not have a truck. And CBS circuits are terrible. I just wanted to share what was happening to my amp. If one have any thoughts feel free to talk about it, if it not constructive keep it to one self. Thank you kindly.Richard salazar
richard