Pedal Amp Design
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
Pedal Amp Design
What sort of topology would be a good design for a preamp used primarily with amp emulators? My thoughts would be perhaps an input tube followed by parallel 12AX7 with a tone stack afterwards and a cathode follower. From that point the signal would go to the effects loop. It would be desirable to gain slight distortion to add an edge to the emulation, which would already be distorted..
Would there be any value in having two different bias values for the parallel tubes in order to voice the signal?
The power amp is already done.
Any suggestions?
Silverfox.
Would there be any value in having two different bias values for the parallel tubes in order to voice the signal?
The power amp is already done.
Any suggestions?
Silverfox.
-
- Posts: 4988
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:01 pm
- Location: 1/3rd the way out one of the arms of the Milkyway.
Re: Pedal Amp Design
What the heck type of pedal, analog?
When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!
Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Not screaming like the passengers in his car!
Cutting out a man's tongue does not mean he’s a liar, but it does show that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Re: Pedal Amp Design
In general lines, if you already have a "cooked, ready to serve" signal, and a clean and loud power amp (so it has no trouble handling what you feed it), the preamp between them shoud be simple and flat.
Even a single triode, a classic "12AX7/100k/1k5" a.k.a. "Fender stage" would do.
All you need is to rise preamp out level to whatever's needed to comfortably drive the power amp.
Since you have more gain than needed (around 50X instead of, say, 5X) you may add a tone control between them.
I suggest a passive HiFi/"Ampeg" type one, for the simple reason that it can be easily set "flat" and just tweak sound a little, if needed, while classic Fender or Marshall are harder to set flat.
Hi Fi:
[img:700:315]http://www.next.gr/uploads/11-91134af9be.gif[/img]
Ampeg:
[img:634:654]http://www.vintageampeg.com/wp-content/ ... 4tone1.png[/img]
remember both require Log/Audio pots, but the beauty is that "setting them to 5" guarantees flat sound, also both provide smooth and symmetrical bass or theble boost and cut ... which simply does not happen with Msh/Fen/Vox tone control types.
The idea is to start flat, set playing level with the band, and only then make minor tweaks if you need a little more or less bite or thump.
IF you need extreme settings, then you have a speaker/cabinet problem (trying to extract 4 x 12" thump from a tiny open back cabinet or bite/sparkle out of a really dull speaker) .
Even a single triode, a classic "12AX7/100k/1k5" a.k.a. "Fender stage" would do.
All you need is to rise preamp out level to whatever's needed to comfortably drive the power amp.
Since you have more gain than needed (around 50X instead of, say, 5X) you may add a tone control between them.
I suggest a passive HiFi/"Ampeg" type one, for the simple reason that it can be easily set "flat" and just tweak sound a little, if needed, while classic Fender or Marshall are harder to set flat.
Hi Fi:
[img:700:315]http://www.next.gr/uploads/11-91134af9be.gif[/img]
Ampeg:
[img:634:654]http://www.vintageampeg.com/wp-content/ ... 4tone1.png[/img]
remember both require Log/Audio pots, but the beauty is that "setting them to 5" guarantees flat sound, also both provide smooth and symmetrical bass or theble boost and cut ... which simply does not happen with Msh/Fen/Vox tone control types.
The idea is to start flat, set playing level with the band, and only then make minor tweaks if you need a little more or less bite or thump.
IF you need extreme settings, then you have a speaker/cabinet problem (trying to extract 4 x 12" thump from a tiny open back cabinet or bite/sparkle out of a really dull speaker) .
-
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 2:53 am
- Location: ohio
- Contact:
Re: Pedal Amp Design
Look at the matchless hotbox.
How bout the JTM45
stevem- " a preamp used primarily with amp emulators?
JMFahey- Thanks for the detailed response. Do you have any thoughts on a JTM45 as the basic preamp topology? That amp doesn't distort much and takes overdrive pedals well. Perhaps using the tone stack you suggested would be viable? As I mentioned in the OP I think I want just a little hair to grit up the tones from the AdrenaLinn 3 emulator I run.
As for the power amp- This forum contributed towards my Sunn Sceptre power amp section and so far that is working out just fantastic.
silverfox.
JMFahey- Thanks for the detailed response. Do you have any thoughts on a JTM45 as the basic preamp topology? That amp doesn't distort much and takes overdrive pedals well. Perhaps using the tone stack you suggested would be viable? As I mentioned in the OP I think I want just a little hair to grit up the tones from the AdrenaLinn 3 emulator I run.
As for the power amp- This forum contributed towards my Sunn Sceptre power amp section and so far that is working out just fantastic.
silverfox.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 5:47 pm
- Location: Qc, Canada
Re: Pedal Amp Design
hi,
i've used a white cathode follower (WFC) ( see attached) to make myself a recording/practicing preamp with line out output. mine is a 2rock JM Sig preamp with a WFC.
it Still under troubleshooting but it works so far.
i've used EDCOR XSM10K/600 for OT.
Regards
Mat
i've used a white cathode follower (WFC) ( see attached) to make myself a recording/practicing preamp with line out output. mine is a 2rock JM Sig preamp with a WFC.
it Still under troubleshooting but it works so far.
i've used EDCOR XSM10K/600 for OT.
Regards
Mat
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
1965 Gibson Falcon GA19-RVT
Thanks for the Post Mat
Thanks for all the posts so far. I'm really leaning towards putting a JTM-45 in front of the power amp at this point. Unless there is some reason not to... In fact I'll also take the opportunity to screw up what is currently working by rewiring the power amp build I posted here under another topic. I will be posting that project as soon as I get ready to start.
silverfox.
silverfox.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 5:47 pm
- Location: Qc, Canada
Re: Pedal Amp Design
Hi Silverfox
Here's what inspired me for my stand alone preamp.
http://www.frontiernet.net/~jff/SonOfAl ... icF2B.html
search on TAG for JM signature recording preamp, you'll find my complete schematic. Still troubleshooting the reverb squeal but it works well nonetheless.
Regards
Mat
Here's what inspired me for my stand alone preamp.
http://www.frontiernet.net/~jff/SonOfAl ... icF2B.html
search on TAG for JM signature recording preamp, you'll find my complete schematic. Still troubleshooting the reverb squeal but it works well nonetheless.
Regards
Mat
1965 Gibson Falcon GA19-RVT
-
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 3:27 am
Re: Pedal Amp Design
Audio taper required, but what audio taper? 10% ? 30%? Seems that would be important to get flat response with both set to 5.JMFahey wrote:
remember both require Log/Audio pots, but the beauty is that "setting them to 5" guarantees flat sound, also both provide smooth and symmetrical bass or theble boost and cut ... which simply does not happen with Msh/Fen/Vox tone control types.
The idea is to start flat, set playing level with the band, and only then make minor tweaks if you need a little more or less bite or thump.
IF you need extreme settings, then you have a speaker/cabinet problem (trying to extract 4 x 12" thump from a tiny open back cabinet or bite/sparkle out of a really dull speaker) .
-Robert
Nice Project Mat
Yes that is very nicely done Mat. Just out of curiosity- I've got several 600 ohm mic matching transformers from a Bogen type PA. I wonder if those would work for creating a balanced line out?
Please keep in mind I want to be able to go from clean to a "Haired Up" tone coming from an amp emulator. I already have 40 amp models to play with. I really only use about 5 of them and it is really getting down to the Ecstasy and the JTM 45 models. I think too if the JTM tube preamp is over-driven with the emulator it should take on a classic Marshall tone.
Another reason for JTM prejudice is, if I just want to play with no emulator I like the JTM sound and the Sceptre power amp reproduces low frequencies very well.
Presently clearing out the space for the amp project and it's about time to start the build thread...
silverfox.
Please keep in mind I want to be able to go from clean to a "Haired Up" tone coming from an amp emulator. I already have 40 amp models to play with. I really only use about 5 of them and it is really getting down to the Ecstasy and the JTM 45 models. I think too if the JTM tube preamp is over-driven with the emulator it should take on a classic Marshall tone.
Another reason for JTM prejudice is, if I just want to play with no emulator I like the JTM sound and the Sceptre power amp reproduces low frequencies very well.
Presently clearing out the space for the amp project and it's about time to start the build thread...
silverfox.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 5:47 pm
- Location: Qc, Canada
Re: Nice Project Mat
Hi,SilverFox wrote: I wonder if those would work for creating a balanced line out?
I'm not the good guy to ask this question. Not enough knowledge. This was my first tube amp building beside some minor mods to an existing amp.
You can still compare your "OT" to other line matching OT datasheet.
A friend of mine test the WFC by highjacking signal from a jcm800 then get throught the WFC then to a "standard OT" and speaker. As him, you can build some kind of circuit to test the XFo you already have.
The signal at the treble pot in a complete amp feeds the phase inverter (PI). PI’s are, for the most part, unity gain devices. The PI output drives the power tube grids which are biased at ~-35 VDC. So…the voltage at the treble pot has to be at least 35 VAC p-p (I think) to drive the power tube grids enough to obtain full output power., so you'll need to calm down the voltages to 0,7@1,25 volts for line level via a matching XFo.
There's plenty of guru here that will help you as they helped me! Thanks everybody for the help you've been and the one to come ! Amp designing is a fun journey.
Have fun !
Mat
1965 Gibson Falcon GA19-RVT
Dumble Loop D-Lator
How would a Dumble Loop circuit compare with all these discussions? With the addition of a tone control network inside the loop?
This is very similar to the Ampeg Tone stack suggested by JMFahey.
silverfox.
This is very similar to the Ampeg Tone stack suggested by JMFahey.
silverfox.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.