So this amp is a standard 101HRM version, except for the voltages than are significantly lower that usual you previously wrote
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal
massygt6 wrote: V1 and V2 values has some mods, that I can tell you, as said before, next time I will open the amp.
You use the linear trimmer (B). Needs logarithmic potentiometer (A).massygt6 wrote:my BASS trimmer on the HRM board its acting more like a switch...it's a sort of ON-OFF setting, from a very low bass content, to a full boost...guess that it's not normal!
Yes my bass trimmer is doing the same. However I can still hear difference when turning the trimmer up after the "switch"point. Some people do take a lower value bass trimmer for fine tuning.massygt6 wrote:.
About that, I'd liketo ask you a question...my BASS trimmer on the HRM board its acting more like a switch...it's a sort of ON-OFF setting, from a very low bass content, to a full boost...guess that it's not normal!
Hope this will clarify a little.
thanks! I'll try that...EaNot wrote:massygt6, many thanks!
You use the linear trimmer (B). Needs logarithmic potentiometer (A).massygt6 wrote:my BASS trimmer on the HRM board its acting more like a switch...it's a sort of ON-OFF setting, from a very low bass content, to a full boost...guess that it's not normal!
Oh, so it's a common behaviour in HRM designs...actually I've a 250k trimmer if I'm not wrong...erwin_ve wrote: Yes my bass trimmer is doing the same. However I can still hear difference when turning the trimmer up after the "switch"point. Some people do take a lower value bass trimmer for fine tuning.
You bet!massygt6 wrote:Dumble does Guns and Roses? yes!
Dave, yes, that is my favorite clip which clearly demonstrates the raw gain on tap, but that it also stays defined and articulate and doesn't become a flat-sounding chainsaw.stelligan wrote:That is a bad ass wah clip! loved it.....
Thanks for posting that link Max. I actually just found that one last week. The sound isn't great but gets the point across.Max wrote:Here an original 4th generation "classic" ODS goes "Heavy" with a 7-string (starting from around 5:20): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qvMwCte8TE
Max, what do you think about having both the Mid-Boost and Deep switches?Max wrote:If you should like these tones then you'll find an explanation how to dial them in in the first minutes of this video and perhaps you’ll get an impression why the "deep" switch is called the "deep" switch, too.
I am still a bit confused by the OD stage and the differences between generations. Is the Ratio a separate function? I thought this became the Level, which is a master volume for the OD stage? (please forgive me as I am still learning all of the Dumble history). So we have Drive, Ratio, and Level...Max wrote: "The secret control on the Overdrive's panel section is the ratio control, which controls how much overdrive is fed back into the circuit. If you turn that up, it's Rock City." (Alexander Dumble in Guitar Player Magazine – September 1985).
Yes! This is what I really like about Massygt6's amp. He is achieving incredible levels of gain with fantastic distortion and it does not become a muddy or flat sounding chainsaw, but maintains a high level of definition and clarity. I love that you can get wonderful legato and it sounds fluid and liquidy. Killer tone!Max wrote:What I like about the high gain tone of these 4th generation "classic" amps is the fact that you get all the gain without loosing dynamic response and articulation as is demonstrated to some extent in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGPxrt7d6xk
ColossalMax, what do you think about having both the Mid-Boost and Deep switches?
Tony, this is excellent and thanks for the reply. This is exactly the kind of specificity I was looking for. I'm still trying to wrap my brain around all of the options and what is used for what. I do like a mid-prominent sound, but that comes from my experience playing Marshally amps. That is very interesting to know about the interaction of Mid and Deep negating the mid-boost somewhat; I hadn't thought about that in terms of how the two are working together in the circuit!talbany wrote:ColossalMax, what do you think about having both the Mid-Boost and Deep switches?
I know this was addressed to Max but I'll throw my coin in the pond.. I added both mid boost and Deep to my 2nd Generation 100w hybrid ..IMHO they do serve there purpose used one at a time.. I do find myself using the deep switch more on this amp than any of my Skyliners.. If you activate both together you get a much smaller mid range boost which maybe you find useful so IMHO are a kind of contradiction..
BTW.. I like mid boost option on my 2nd gen hybrid amp especially in OD
Hope This Helps!!
Tony
That's pretty typical, however where it may not seem to make a difference after it "switches on" there is some interaction between the controls. Scott was very careful to measure my HRM settings to values he knows to be good then make minor adjustments. I don't know what these settings would be on your amp as mine is a BluesMaster.massygt6 wrote:I'd liketo ask you a question...my BASS trimmer on the HRM board its acting more like a switch...it's a sort of ON-OFF setting, from a very low bass content, to a full boost...guess that it's not normal!
Hope this will clarify a little.
Hi Colossal,Colossal wrote:Max, what do you think about having both the Mid-Boost and Deep switches?
Max wrote: "The secret control on the Overdrive's panel section is the ratio control, which controls how much overdrive is fed back into the circuit. If you turn that up, it's Rock City." (Alexander Dumble in Guitar Player Magazine – September 1985).
In a functional sense the "ratio" control sets the relationship between the volume of the OD channel and the clean channel. But for my ears the tone is different when you set the ratio very high and the master low or vice versa. Why this is the case I don't know. For high gain "rock" tones I indeed prefer the tone with the ratio more wide open. If I really play high gain lead sounds in a certain musical context I usually don't need footswitchable clean sounds with a certain volume level anyway.I am still a bit confused by the OD stage and the differences between generations. Is the Ratio a separate function? I thought this became the Level, which is a master volume for the OD stage? (please forgive me as I am still learning all of the Dumble history). So we have Drive, Ratio, and Level...
Dave glad it was of some use.. Also keep in mind the 2nd generation amps are already midrange/bright heavy amps to my ears so some might feel that the mid boost in these amps are a bit over the top especially with single coils and a bright sounding speaker..If you are a fan of soaring cut through the mix type mid range you might find this feature useful.. Just thought I would mention.. Good Luck!!Colossal wrote:Tony, this is excellent and thanks for the reply. This is exactly the kind of specificity I was looking for. I'm still trying to wrap my brain around all of the options and what is used for what. I do like a mid-prominent sound, but that comes from my experience playing Marshally amps. That is very interesting to know about the interaction of Mid and Deep negating the mid-boost somewhat; I hadn't thought about that in terms of how the two are working together in the circuit!talbany wrote:ColossalMax, what do you think about having both the Mid-Boost and Deep switches?
I know this was addressed to Max but I'll throw my coin in the pond.. I added both mid boost and Deep to my 2nd Generation 100w hybrid ..IMHO they do serve there purpose used one at a time.. I do find myself using the deep switch more on this amp than any of my Skyliners.. If you activate both together you get a much smaller mid range boost which maybe you find useful so IMHO are a kind of contradiction..
BTW.. I like mid boost option on my 2nd gen hybrid amp especially in OD
Hope This Helps!!
Tony
Best regards,
Dave
Max, I am sure you are right about HAD doing what he did for very specific reasons and not arbitrary addition of "mods" that might have minimal utility. That is very likely the case.Max wrote:I have no personal experience with this combination because AFAIK it does not exist in any original Dumble amp. At least I never played such an amp if one should exist. But I am rather sure that Alexander had his reasons not to combine them. My impression ist, that all he does has a very good reason and I don't think it is that probable that he did never built an amp with this combination because this would have be too complicated for him or too expensive etc.. But this is only guessing of course.
So Max, does Ratio essentially become Drive in later generations? Sorry for being dense on this. I understand what it does however. Thanks!Max wrote:In a functional sense the "ratio" control sets the relationship between the volume of the OD channel and the clean channel. But for my ears the tone is different when you set the ratio very high and the master low or vice versa. Why this is the case I don't know. For high gain "rock" tones I indeed prefer the tone with the ratio more wide open. If I really play high gain lead sounds in a certain musical context I usually don't need footswitchable clean sounds with a certain volume level anyway.
Very useful Tony, thanks. Ah! An excellent point about the greater mids in the 2nd gen amps. I didn't think of that eithertalbany wrote:Dave glad it was of some use.. Also keep in mind the 2nd generation amps are already midrange/bright heavy amps to my ears so some might feel that the mid boost in these amps are a bit over the top especially with single coils and a bright sounding speaker..If you are a fan of soaring cut through the mix type mid range you might find this feature useful.. Just thought I would mention.. Good Luck!!
Tony