Deep switch question

Overdrive Special, Steel String Singer, Dumbleland, Odyssey, Winterland, etc. -
Members Only

Moderators: pompeiisneaks, Colossal

jcsifu
Posts: 272
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 4:29 am
Location: California

Re: Deep switch question

Post by jcsifu »

I dig those beefy switches Charley...
jam-mill
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:37 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Deep switch question

Post by jam-mill »

This layout appears to have the deep switch oriented correctly. Note: layout corrected from original post - sorry for any misinformation :-(
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by jam-mill on Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Charlie Wilson
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: Deep switch question

Post by Charlie Wilson »

Jam-Mill, I don't think so on that layout. If those are toggle switches and the chassis is labeled Deep above the switch, it is upside down. Remember what M Fowler pointed out, with toggles, when the switch bat goes up the two bottom sets of terminals make contact. The deep switch it is ON when the 270k resistors make contact with the cap and resistor network and they are on the top set of terminals in your layout. Aaron, I believe that cap is labeled PS D47 but typically it should be .0047 or .005.
CW
jam-mill
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:37 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Deep switch question

Post by jam-mill »

In the layout with the switch in the 'up' position, the center (common) and bottom terminals are connected together. This connects the two 270K resistors in to the rest of the 'deep' circuit. Seems like this engages the low-pass filter network (1M || .01u) -- 10K to ground. Is that not the case? Wouldn't that be adding the filter into the circuit? If not, then I am really confused.
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14034
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: Deep switch question

Post by M Fowler »

That layout looks correct for a tubes down amp like the Dumble ODS.
jam-mill
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:37 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Deep switch question

Post by jam-mill »

@M Fowler - Thank-You for confirming!
Charlie Wilson
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: Deep switch question

Post by Charlie Wilson »

Jam-mill, the 270k resistors are on the top terminals in your layout. The don't make contact with anything when the switch is toggled up.
CW
Last edited by Charlie Wilson on Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
aflynt
Posts: 411
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:39 pm
Location: North Tonawanda, New York
Contact:

Re: Deep switch question

Post by aflynt »

I'm pretty sure that deep switch layout above is the opposite of how HAD wired them with toggle (not slide) switches. It's the opposite of the photos of unchanged early '80s amps I've seen anyway.

-Aaron
Last edited by aflynt on Sat Jan 10, 2015 10:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jam-mill
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:37 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Deep switch question

Post by jam-mill »

Crap - I uploaded the wrong picture; fixing it now...
Charlie Wilson
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: Deep switch question

Post by Charlie Wilson »

Jam-mill, now that looks correct.(reference corrected layout) :D
CW
User avatar
M Fowler
Posts: 14034
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:19 am
Location: Walcott ND

Re: Deep switch question

Post by M Fowler »

I just went through my photos and schematics, the wiring of this switch is all over the place between TAG layouts and Ceriatone layouts.

So if the toggle bat is up the 270k/270k resistors have to be on the bottom lugs to engage deep function?
User avatar
aflynt
Posts: 411
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:39 pm
Location: North Tonawanda, New York
Contact:

Re: Deep switch question

Post by aflynt »

These are from the #133 (Steve Watson) amp that was reportedly never updated or serviced after purchase.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Charlie Wilson
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: Deep switch question

Post by Charlie Wilson »

M Fowler, that is correct. Also note that the 270k resistor that comes off of the deep switch and goes to the Jazz/Rock switch should go to the middle terminals(on the Jazz/Rock) switch not the bottom ones. Tony's Low Plate Classic Layout in incorrect in that regards. This only matters if you engage the deep and jazz function at the same time.
CW
Last edited by Charlie Wilson on Sat Jan 10, 2015 11:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jam-mill
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:37 pm
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Deep switch question

Post by jam-mill »

M Fowler wrote:I just went through my photos and schematics, the wiring of this switch is all over the place between TAG layouts and Ceriatone layouts.

...
I attempted to start this topic earlier about this very issue : http://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26685
User avatar
Structo
Posts: 15446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:01 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Deep switch question

Post by Structo »

When I built my amp I tried the Deep switch in place of the Mid Boost.

I thought the Deep switch was pretty subtle and not real good for me.

Then I tried the Mid Boost and I liked that much better plus it is easier to mod if necessary.

So I made my footswitch with Mid Boost, OD and PAB.

Also put a switched pot on the Presence so I can turn off NFB.

I wired the bright switch to Bright on Clean only, Bright on for both clean and OD, and Bright Off.
Tom

Don't let that smoke out!
Post Reply