Hi ampcrack,ampcrack wrote:[quote="talbany")
When the 2nd generation was manufactured
- pre production ODS with the 3 step OD switch (1968 - 1972)
- 1st generation (1972 - 1975)
- 2nd generation (1975 - 1978)
- 3rd generation (1978 - 1979)
- transition generation (1979 - 1981)
Great work Tony!
And I also agree with Max and some of you others.
But personally I do not think that we can generally pinpoint HAD's work this specifically.
Like I know of two ODS amps in the 02x's that were ordered in 1979 and delivered in late 1980.
And I know of two ODS amps in the 05x's that were ordered, one in 1979
and the other in 1980. Both delivered in 1981!
So I guess there are a lot of exceptions here, or?
Why do you think that these three transition generation "classic" amps you tell to know from hearsay are exceptions? The production/delivery year dates you report (1980/81) match exactly with those posted by Tony (talbany) for the transition generation "classic" ODS amps (1979 -1981)?
And why do you think that the fact that some of the chassis of these transition generation "classic" ODS amps look rather similar to the 2nd and 3rd generation chassis and some of them even have series numbers from the 2nd and 3rd generation series number range is surprising?
Just this is the reason why I call them transition generation "classic" ODS:
Their circuits and features are already very similar to the 4th generation "classic" ODS amps. But some of their chassis still look rather similar to a 2nd or 3rd generation chassis, or even have a series # from the 2nd or 3rd generation range.
And BTW: Of course there are always exception from all generalisations. And my personal opinion concerning exceptions in regard to the ODS "generations" I have posted here http://ampgarage.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 327#137327 :
Have a great weekend,Max wrote:But of course there will be exceptions - just as you will find some few 50ies Les Paul Customs with only two PAFs or with some kind of Switchmaster wiring etc.
In some kind of metaphor you could perhaps compare this with a Gaussian bell curve: Most amps from the same generation have very similar specs, some will have specs that are a bit different from the more usual ones and very few will have specs that are very different or even more similar to the usual specs of the previous or the next generation.
IMO this is indeed very similar to the usual generalisations which are commonly used in regard to different generations of Les Pauls and Stratocasters as an example. And IMO it makes sense to use generalisations in communication like "Goldtop with PAFs" even though you will find some differences between Les Pauls from this "generation" (black parts, dark backs, etc.). IMO generalisations like "3rd generation 'pre-classic' ODS" are meaningful semantic means of communication - no more, no less.
But if someone should prefer to call what I call the "3rd generation 'pre-classic' ODS amps":
"The ODS amps with a silver chassis and toggle EQ and manual/pedal switches that have been originally built with an accent switch on their front panels and without a presence and a ratio control on their front or back panels"
this would IMO be just an other possibility to make clear what kind of ODS someone is precisely talking about .
But personally I prefer to save some time and breath and to just say and write "3rd generation 'pre-classic' ODS". This is just more to my personal taste than some other obvious possibilities to "name" this kind of ODS amps whose layout and front panel look (3rd generation "export" combo pic) have been posted in the OP of this thread.
Max